Here's a chilling warning from a global warming alarmist who calls himself a “science communicator”: he (or she) would like to see a catastrophe that could be blamed on global warming wipe out a city of 150,000 people. His advice for those who agree: don't say so, but be ready to “return to the real issue: the danger of the denialist agenda.”
This reads like a parody, and I hope it is. Can there really be people who would like to see 150,000 people die “for their own good?" Are some people so dedicated to “the environment” that they would relish seeing 150,000 people killed?