Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Metro expected to trim growing payroll

By: Kytja Weir
Examiner Staff Writer
January 2, 2009

The payroll budget for Metro staff, which includes most union positions, increased 5 percent from fiscal 2008 to 2009. (Examiner File)
Metro’s huge payroll means that in tight budget times, such as those the transit agency is currently facing, cuts could affect the system’s workers.

Having already instituted a hiring freeze, Metro officials say they may need to lay off workers as they grapple with next year’s budget.

Almost three-quarters of Metro’s expenses are tied up in personnel costs, representing $1 billion of its $1.36 billion operating budget for the current fiscal year.

Those costs have been growing. From fiscal 2006 to 2009, the overall payroll on the budget grew 16 percent, not including other benefits that employees receive such as pensions, health insurance and workers’ compensation.

Some of those payroll costs are relatively fixed because they are determined by the agency’s five union contracts, which cover about 75 percent of the agency’s staffers, Metro spokeswoman Candace Smith said.

The payroll budget for Metro’s wage earners, which includes most of the unionized positions, increased 5 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009, which started July 1, after similar increases each year since the 2006 budget, according to an Examiner analysis.

But the payroll for salaried employees increased even more, growing 12 percent between the fiscal 2008 and 2009 budgets.

Smith said a portion of that budgeted increase was set aside for 92 new employees, including 28 transit police officers, 25 bus street supervisors and 11 operations control center members.

Some of that 12 percent rise also came from union contracts for transit police officers, who are paid salaries instead of hourly wages, she said.

The remainder of the increased salary costs came from a 5 percent raise for administrative employees approved by the board. That came just months after Metro levied higher fares on riders.

“That’s not unreasonable, compared to federal employees and when you consider the cost of living is going up,” said Metro board member Peter Benjamin, who was formerly the agency’s chief financial officer. “If we don’t keep up the salaries, we don’t end up with the quality people we need.”

But as the economic forecast has soured, Smith said, Metro officials decided to scale back those raises to 2 percent and plan to use the extra money in the next year’s budget.

Benjamin added that the approved budget also may not reflect what actually gets spent.

Metro has since instituted a hiring freeze to accommodate the worsening financial picture. And already the agency said its salaries and wages came in $2 million under budget and overtime costs are $1 million under budget for the fiscal year so far. There are still six months remaining before the 2009 budget ends June 30.

Yet Metro officials are preparing the 2010 budget and plan to present an initial proposal in the coming weeks.

Other transit agencies are facing similar financial pressures. Locally, Maryland’s MARC commuter trains are scaling back service next month, while New York’s subway system is considering major service cuts and a fare increase.


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines



 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

anonymous

Jan 4, 2009

does this gentleman wish to be shown in your newspaper, did you all have his permission, did metro know you were going to expose him to the public eye. I think this employee should find someway to expose you all. there should be some type of reprimand. Someone needs to look into the child support services and find out why the parents the\at are paying do not get any type of tax benifits, where as though the parents that recieve get to not claim the monies on there taxes. Dont get me wrong, ther are a lot of people that do not take proper care of their kids and barely have to pay anything, and ther are some who have been ther since day one that get slammed to the wall. Now tell me do you think that is fair?

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

California's Jahvid Best (4) leaps over Oregon State's Cameron Collins to score during the first half of an NCAA college football game Saturday, Nov. 7, 2009, in Berkeley, Calif. Best was removed from the game on a gurney. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)

Cal star Jahvid Best gets concussion on second-quarter touchdown

California tailback Jahvid Best sustained a concussion and was taken to the emergency room after he leapt high into the air, flipped over a defender and landed on the back of his head in the end zone. Full story

Politics

Demonstrators chant on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009, during a Republican health Care reform rally. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

House Democrats clear impasse over abortion holding up vote on health care legislation

Capping months of months of struggle, House Democrats cleared an abortion-related impasse blocking a vote on sweeping health care legislation late Friday and officials expressed optimism they had finally lined up the support needed to pass President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. Full story

Entertainment

'Golden Girls' star McClanahan has bypass surgery

Rue McClanahan, who played sexy Southern belle Blanche Devereaux on "The Golden Girls," was recovering Thursday from heart bypass surgery at a New York City hospital. Full story