Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Council tweaks gun law, gives tentative approval

By: Michael Neibauer
Examiner Staff Writer
December 3, 2008

The D.C. Council on Tuesday tentatively approved the permanent framework for registering and storing handguns in the District, requiring several hours of gun safety training prior to registration, an annual recertification of every firearm and occasional criminal background checks for gun owners.

The legislation, adopted unanimously on first reading, also restricts access to guns for convicted felons, drunken drivers and domestic abusers. It allows registration of a one gun per month and requires ballistic identification of every firearm.

The bill is “pretty strict” but “not so burdensome,” said at-large Councilman Phil Mendelson, and it addresses the demands of the U.S. Supreme Court, which struck down the District’s 30-year-old handgun ban in June.

“What I hope is we are coming up with a bill that other cities will emulate,” said Mendelson, chairman of the public safety and judiciary committee. “I don’t think that we can go much further without getting into trouble.”

The measure, which the council will take up for a second and final time on Dec. 16, allows D.C. residents to keep a loaded and unlocked handgun in their homes or businesses for self-defense, provided it is safely stored out of the reach of children.

It permits registration, through the Metropolitan Police Department, of one gun every 30 days and requires reregistration of the weapon every three years. The measure also requires annual recertification — a letter to the MPD affirming that the gun remains in its owner’s possession. And it mandates that gun owners undergo criminal background checks be repeated every six years.

“A gun is a dangerous [instrument],” said Ward 3 Councilwoman Mary Cheh. “It’s not like possessing a car.”

The bill also requires that gun owners spend at least one hour at the firing range and four hours in the classroom with a certified gun safety instructor prior to registration.

“Weapons are tools and you need to know how to use them if we’re going to have them in people’s hands,” said Ward 5 Councilman Harry Thomas Jr.

A spokesman for the National Rifle Association could not be reached for comment Tuesday. The NRA in September took D.C. to task for passing “unduly burdensome” requirements in the wake of the Supreme Court decision that serve “as a vehicle for even more onerous restrictions.” The bill approved Tuesday is less restrictive than earlier versions.

The District has allowed handgun and rifle registration since shortly after the Supreme Court’s June 26 decision. As of Friday, according to the MPD, 192 handguns had been registered and 11 handgun applications had been denied.


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines



 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Yikes

Dec 3, 2008

Cars aren't dangerous?!? Really?!?

 

swepi

Dec 3, 2008

The Supreme Court decision means nothing to these tin pot dictators. Why are Democrats so bound and determined to create more victims of violent crime. The Police can't and won't protect you. Now if you dare to protect yourself and you have not followed every little dictate you will be the criminal and the person attacking you will be the victim. Why on earth does anybody in their right mind vote for these people?

 

swepi

Dec 3, 2008

The Supreme Court decision means nothing to these tin pot dictators. Why are Democrats so bound and determined to create more victims of violent crime. The Police can't and won't protect you. Now if you dare to protect yourself and you have not followed every little dictate you will be the criminal and the person attacking you will be the victim. Why on earth does anybody in their right mind vote for these people?

 

Erv

Dec 3, 2008

Council woman Mary Cheh states, guns are dangerous,unlike cars. Death and injury statistics would indicate just the opposite. Cars are far more dangerous,and not limited to those over 21 years of age,and may be used in any state. Other cities have concealed carry of hand guns and no problems with those allowed carry. How come the residents of D.C. aren't seen as responsible enough to have weapons. Are they different from other U.S citizens? It seems the city council believes so.

 

w.p. Coon

Dec 3, 2008

Do you people realy think this foolish proposal will ever be adopted, not worth the paper they are written on. What is needed are rep og government that understand law and firearms.

 

James

Dec 3, 2008

The story doesn't say anything about cost. Is there a fee to register your gun? There shouldn't be. Also, there shouldn't be a requirement for safety training. You are not required to pay, or undergo any training to exercise any of your other rights so why should you have to for this one? I like the idea of the training, except for the frequency, but until you require people to "qualify" to vote or speak, this is a non-starter.

 

JIM

Dec 3, 2008

Nothing is more dangerous than DC council. How mant members have guns in their possession???

 

Ron

Dec 3, 2008

The right to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed. End of discussion!

 

gbcps12

Dec 3, 2008

It's not like possesing a car? Let me see? How many people die each year from accidental shootings? How many people are killed every year from car acidents? Besides the right to own and bear a car isn't in the Constitution. Also the 2nd Amendment says "The right of the People to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed". This new law for "The People's Republic of Washington D C" sounds like a definite infringment.

 

The Answer

Dec 3, 2008

Mary Cheh must not know that more people die in car accidents, than by firearm

 

smitchNRA

Dec 3, 2008

Wake-up people!!!!! Do you really think law following people use thier tools of protection (GUNS)to break laws! It is comming the (DEMOCRATS) and they want your money your GUNs and FREEDOM! Are you going to stand there and take this, stand-up fight, buy more guns join and send money to the NRA!

 

smitchNRA

Dec 3, 2008

Wake-up people!!!!! Do you really think law following people use thier tools of protection (GUNS)to break laws! It is comming the (DEMOCRATS) and they want your money your GUNs and FREEDOM! Are you going to stand there and take this, stand-up fight, buy more guns join and send money to the NRA!

 

JW

Dec 3, 2008

Were these idiots voted in or appointed by another idiot?

 

JW

Dec 3, 2008

Were these idiots voted in or appointed by another idiot?

 

Dec 3, 2008

goverment again breaking the constution goverment against the people

 

Dec 3, 2008

goverment again breaking the constution goverment against the people

 

shark60

Dec 3, 2008

A citizen has the right and duty to resist any unlawful intrusion of his or her rights as an American Citizen. Quit knuckling under and stand up for your rights! Our greatest enemy is the intrusion of the Federal government on the rights of the states to handle their own interests. Follow the Constitution and not the legislative usurping of your rights!

 

the same

Dec 3, 2008

Washington DC is a shineing example of why I hate socialists. They are no different then the bully on your block or in your school, or Joseph Stalin

 

Sarah Brady

Dec 4, 2008

When governmental officials sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution pass (unlawful) laws to abrogate it, then they themselves become lawless tyrants. Clearly the D.C. City Council's assault on the supreme law of the land, soon to be followed by the Federal Government led by Barack Obama, signals the beginning of the end of America's democracy.

 

dlp2155

Dec 4, 2008

Let me tell you something, if they every get our guns from us, they will take away the rest of our freedoms. Read the Constitution, it spells out what the government CAN'T do!!!

 

Frank Parsons

Dec 4, 2008

So now anyone convicted or caught up in a DUI, cannot protect their lives? Heck I think "reformed" felons can bear arms, as long as their history is non violent! Gun laws only incriminate law abiding citizens! Criminals don't follow the laws! If the government cannot guarantee our safety, what right do they have to take away self protection?

 

abrad

Dec 4, 2008

I thought the DC Council wanted citizen gun owners to register their guns. I think that with this new legislation citizens that own guns probably won't register. Why will they? I can see new guns being registered every 30 days but why should citizens that already own more than one gun have to wait 30 days between registering each one. After all they still have the guns. Some one moving into the district with more than one gun will have to wait 30 days between registering each one. I have this problem and have been having to return to the gun control unit repeatedly to register each gun. Go figure this one out.

 

BOB CAYTON

Dec 4, 2008

MICHAEL, A COMMENT TO PHIL MENDELSON IF YOU WILL BE SO KIND. MR. MENDELSON WHY SHOULD "ANY" CITY EMULATE YOUR DRACONIAN GUN LAWS? YOU HAVE THE HIGHEST MURDER RATE IN THE USA. "THEY DID NOT;THEY WILL NOT WORK."

 

ed

Dec 4, 2008

Mendelson is an liberial idiot. He continues to go against the intent of the Supreme Court. It is still the strictest gun law in the US. Hopefully, Congress will not pass it. Does DC goverment require ballistic tests on every handgun recovered from criminals/crime scenes? Current enforcement of guns laws against criminals in DC is almost nonexistant. Most cases are dropped. Mendelson and the rest are against guns for purely political reasons since whatever weakens the NRA also weakens Republicans.

 

Dec 4, 2008

If the N.R.A. had 50 million members instead of what we have you would see a big difference in these stupid laws

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

President of the Italian Tennis Federation Francesco Ricci Bitti and U.S. Fed Cup player Melanie Oudin meet the media  ahead of the Fed Cup tennis final between Italy and the United States, in Reggio ...

ITF president says hefty fine — not ban — likely for Serena Williams over US Open tirade

Top-ranked Serena Williams will most likely receive a "significant" fine but no suspension for her U.S. Open tirade, the president of the International Tennis Federation said. Full story

Entertainment

Carrey's 'Christmas Carol' wraps up $31M weekend

Jim Carrey's Scrooge collected holiday donations from movie fans with his new take on "A Christmas Carol," which took in $31 million to open as the weekend's top movie. Full story

Entertainment

Carrey's 'Christmas Carol' wraps up $31M weekend

Jim Carrey's Scrooge collected holiday donations from movie fans with his new take on "A Christmas Carol," which took in $31 million to open as the weekend's top movie. Full story