Washington Examiner  home delivery | classifieds | autos | jobs | real estate | home listings | advertise
   
Dining stimulus plan
Welcome,   My Account |  Log out
Welcome, Guest  Sign In |  Register
Monday, March 22, 2010 | Last Update 11:59 EDT
View today's E-Dition

click for forecast
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classifieds Jobs Autos Home Listings
Nation World Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays Opinion Zone Weather Mobile Site RSS Feeds Contact
Nation World Science Education RSS Feeds
Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York Chris Stirewalt
Local Front DC Virginia Maryland Blogs Crime Transportation People Education Real Estate Events Calendar
Editorials Beltway Confidential OpinionZone Nate Beeler Columnists Mark Tapscott Dave Freddoso Mark Hemingway
Your Money Real Estate Technology K-Street
Blogs Redskins/NFL Wizards/NBA Caps/NHL Nationals/MLB United/MLS Colleges Golf
Yeas & Nays Movies Television Music Health Events Calendar

Local
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

Legal Sea Foods to leave Reagan, files lawsuit

By: Freeman Klopott
Examiner Staff Writer
July 2, 2009


National Airport's most popular restaurant, Legal Sea Foods, is scheduled to leave the airport in August after lease negotiations with the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority failed, according to a lawsuit filed by the restaurant chain claiming the airport authority did not conduct an open bidding process for the new lease.

Legal Sea Foods has asked a judge in Alexandria's federal court to prevent another concession from taking the space. The space is expected to be taken over by Sam & Harry's steakhouse, the airport authority said in June.

"It's unfortunate that a lawsuit is being pursued and [Legal Sea Foods] was not able to reach a business agreement," said airport authority spokesman Rob Yingling. "The specific issues of the lawsuit will be addressed in a courtroom."

The Boston-based chain has been in Reagan since 1997 and has won seven awards during that time. According to the lawsuit, it's one of the top revenue-producing concessions at the airport and is a flagship restaurant for the chain.

The dispute over its lease started in spring 2008, when Legal began negotiations for a new lease with Concession Management, the company hired by the airport authority to handle concession leases, court documents said. The original lease ended in December, but Legal obtained an extension to August.

Legal claims that throughout the negotiations, it was operating "in the dark" because neither the airport authority nor Westfield had made public the requirements for signing a lease for the space. The restaurant also claims the authority and Westfield did not provide information regarding other proposals. Legal's attorneys assert the authority violated the law by conducting "a completely closed and secret selection process."

At the center of the lease negotiations was a demand by the airport authority that Legal expand the airport restaurant, court documents said. The negotiations broke down when the restaurant and airport authority could not agree on a timeline for construction, Legal Sea Food spokesman Michael Meehan told The Examiner. The airport authority wanted Legal to shut down from August through November for the renovations. Legal wanted to make the changes in two phases and keep its doors open.

The airport authority refused, Meehan said.

Legal Sea Foods filed the lawsuit because "it wants to get to the bottom of what happened," Meehan said.

fkopott@washingtonexaminer.com


Topics

Washington Examiner



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines
  1. Rules Committee meeting descends into chaos
  2. Democrats to America: Drop dead
  3. Support surges for Stupak's re-election opponent after abortion funding deal with White House
  4. Questions about the Stupak deal
  5. William Saunders: Democrats' EO offer shows Obamacare does fund abortion
  6. Stupak is still a firm "no"
  7. Pro-Life group withdraws award scheduled for Stupak UPDATE: Was Stupak bought with $726,409 for airports?
  8. 16,500 more IRS agents needed to enforce Obamacare
  9. Either learn to love Obamacare, or sue to stop it
  10. Health care reform means more power for the IRS





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words. Warning: If you comment, the Disqus platform default is set to email you when other reply to it. If you do not want to receive these replies to your comment, please uncheck the box.


blog comments powered by Disqus


Local

Deadly accidents involving iPods alarm officials

At least three people in the Washington region have died in accidents in the last year, while wearing headphones. Full story

Sports

NCAA Tournament: Games to watch, March 19, 2010

No. 5 Temple vs. No. 12 Cornell Where »... Full story

Scoop

Scoop: Bullock’s marriage called a total sham

More revelations are emerging about the... Full story

Internships | Maps | RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Mobile | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Rack Locations | Advertise