Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Auditor: Tax office failed to do backgrounds checks

By: Bill Myers
Examiner Staff Writer
October 26, 2008

Finance officials under city Chief Financial Officer Natwar Gandhi failed to screen applicants and never checked employees’ backgrounds after they were hired, a new report shows. — Examiner File Photo
D.C.’s finance office did not check the backgrounds of job applicants who later stole from taxpayers, a new report by the D.C. auditor has concluded.

Finance officials under city Chief Financial Officer Natwar Gandhi failed to screen applicants and never checked employees’ backgrounds after they were hired, Deborah Nichols wrote in a report dated Friday.

Without “pre-employment background checks, an employee with significant financial problems may be placed in a position of trust where temptation is rigorously tested, the internal control environment is weak and internal controls are nonexistent, inadequate, or function poorly,” Nichols wrote.

Friday’s report followed up on a May audit that found that finance employees were helping themselves to thousands of dollars in cash from city coffers. That report came out as the finance office was still reeling from revelations that a low-level bureaucrat pilfered nearly $50 million through a phony property tax refund scam. 

Finance office spokesman David Umansky hotly disputed Nichols’ findings. He said that Gandhi’s staff has been thoroughly screened for years and that Gandhi has taken the further step of re-checking employees who were hired before background checks were required.
 
“What I’m telling you is, when I was hired, I had to provide a raft of information — including past tax returns,” Umansky said. “Anytime someone is hired, a complete investigation is done.”

D.C. Councilwoman Mary Cheh, D-Ward 3, wasn’t swayed by Umansky’s pleadings. She called Nichols’ finding “jaw-dropping.”

“It really calls into question the good judgment and oversight of the managers,” she said.

Asked whether that includes Gandhi himself, Cheh said: “He was in charge there, too, right?”


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines



 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Oct 26, 2008

Doesn't seem to matter, he's still employed.

 

DC Resident

Oct 26, 2008

So I say again, Fenty when are you going to fire Gandi. He grossly failed in the performance of his duty more than the low level employess in Child and Family Services whom you fired without any evidence they were at fault and while you are in your firing mode, you also need to fire the Director of Youth Services oh I forgot, you Mayor don't fire your friends.

 

rmp

Oct 27, 2008

There has been much made of this, and cathing all of those involved has become the #1 priority. However this mr. Gandi has yet to be haled accoutable for his lack of control for his enteir office. He is ultimatly responsible for whatever happens on his watch. Instead he has been rewarded with a huge raise, I am a firm believer that he should have been fired also!!! Adrian Fenty has missed the mark with this one in a big way!!!

 

Oct 27, 2008

Mayor Fenty and his Administration are out to KILL, STEAL and Destroy the District Government. City Council need to step up and take notice that this Administration had damage the Government in 2 yrs. It seems to me that City Council is waiting for a total collapse before they do anything to stop this madness.

 

Voice of Reason

Oct 27, 2008

For those of you that don't know, the Mayor cannot fire the CFO the same way he can an ordinary department head. The process is difficult, convoluted, and probably would require the consent of Congress. The CFO position was established by Congress to be independent of the Mayor, and allowing the Mayor to simply fire him would defeat the purpose of having a politically independent CFO.

 

mitzy

Oct 27, 2008

you need to get rid of fenty

 

ed

Oct 28, 2008

What about all the vacant properties that are not being taxed at the higher rate? It is costing the taxpayers $50 million per year since 2002. That's $300 million! Perhaps some of those unvetted employees are taking bribes. Where is the oversight, Jack Evans?

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Auburn running back Mario Fannin (27) fights his way into the end zone for a touchdown past Furma's  Ryan Steed (1) during an NCAA college football game on Saturday, Nov. 7, 2009, in Auburn, Ala. (AP Photo/ Butch Dill)

Chris Todd throws 4 touchdowns, completing his first 14 passes, as Auburn routs Furman 63-31

Chris Todd threw for 256 yards and four touchdowns, completing his first 14 passes, as Auburn cruised to an easy 63-31 win over Furman on Saturday. Full story

Politics

Demonstrators chant on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009, during a Republican health Care reform rally. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

House Democrats clear impasse over abortion holding up vote on health care legislation

Capping months of months of struggle, House Democrats cleared an abortion-related impasse blocking a vote on sweeping health care legislation late Friday and officials expressed optimism they had finally lined up the support needed to pass President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. Full story

Entertainment

'Golden Girls' star McClanahan has bypass surgery

Rue McClanahan, who played sexy Southern belle Blanche Devereaux on "The Golden Girls," was recovering Thursday from heart bypass surgery at a New York City hospital. Full story