Local

[Print]  [Email]        

House subcommittee OKs pot on D.C. ballot

By: Michael Neibauer
Examiner Staff Writer
June 28, 2009

A House appropriations subcommittee has lifted a long-standing budget rider banning the District government from spending any money to decriminalize marijuana.

The Financial Services panel, which has oversight of D.C., has removed from the 2010 budget 11-year-old language outlawing the District’s use of federal or local funds to legalize marijuana or reduce penalties for its possession or distribution.

“This is definitely something we’ve been working with Congress on for a few years now and communicated with the committee about,” said Bruce Mirken, spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project. “It’s taken a while to get it done, but it looks like maybe this will be the year that it happens.”

The financial services budget, marked up Thursday, “takes further steps towards reducing undue congressional interference in local affairs,” Rep. Jose Serrano, the subcommittee chairman, said in a statement.

Serrano, D-N.Y., said the budget bill “allows the District to conduct and implement a referendum on use of marijuana for medical purposes as has been done in various states.”

The District voted on medical marijuana once before, in 1998, but the votes were declared invalid. Former Rep. Bob Barr raced to have his anti-legalization language added to the budget two weeks before the initiative vote was held. When the ballots were unofficially tallied nearly a year after they were cast, it was learned that 69 percent of voters backed legalization.

If added to the ballot now, it will pass again, said Chuck Thies, a political strategist who worked on the 1998 pro-initiative campaign.

“I look forward to it being on the ballot next year,” he said. “I expect there would be a well-funded, well-organized citywide effort for 2010.”

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administrative is firmly against the legalization of medical marijuana, arguing proponents “are spending huge amounts of money to encourage a greater tolerance for drug use.” Smoked marijuana “has not withstood the rigors of science — it is not medicine and it is not safe,” the DEA argues.

The financial services budget bill also eliminates a longtime ban on the use of local funds for abortion, and it discontinues the ban on the use of funds for domestic partnership registration.

mneibauer@washingtonexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Ed

Jun 29, 2009

"The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administrative is firmly against the legalization of medical marijuana, arguing proponents “are spending huge amounts of money to encourage a greater tolerance for drug use.” Smoked marijuana “has not withstood the rigors of science — it is not medicine and it is not safe,” the DEA argues."

Hmmm...over 7000 studies have been done showing the benefits....thousands and thousands of years of use.I would like the DEA to post a response citing studies done to show its not safe, not personal opinion, but studies. Show me a death. Show me one single instance of a marijuana induced traffic fatality where cannabis was the sole reason for that fatality. Show me a single instance of marijuana causing cancer.

 

Juan

Jun 29, 2009

This is a common sense issue. And that's why we're seeing more and more state and local govs moving towards sensible policies.

We're definitely starting to reach critical mass - it's going to be an interesting next couple of years on the Marijuana policy front... long overdue...

 

Sensible

Jun 29, 2009

Could it be?
Are we starting to see the enablers of prohibition losing the war?
Is Washington waking up to the will of the people?
This at least looks like common sense is showing through.
Can you imagine if the prohibitionists were vanquished and the country started moving back toward freedom?

 

TYC

Jun 29, 2009

Americans are tired of being thrown in a cage for smoking a joint instead of drinking a beer. Americans are tired of being shot for being in the wrong address when DEA and SWAT teams hit the wrong house. Americans are tired of having the cops dress up a postal workers and deliver a box of cannabis in the mail then kicking the door down and shooting anything that moves.

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Just words without meaning to the people running the security apparatus of this country and other repressive nations worldwide.

 

Q

Jun 29, 2009

It's common sense. Marijuana has been illegal for less than 100 years, yet it has been in our lives for thousands. Alcohol does 100 times the physical harm that MJ does, plus, people are idiots when they're drunk. I say reverse the legal roles. 21 to buy joints and you get locked up for weeks for having a beer.

 

InsanityRules

Jun 29, 2009

If our government is going to get serious about protecting us from dried plants, let's send the DEA into tobacco company boardrooms with stun grenades and zip ties. Then we can incarcerate the people behind the tobacco menace, which kills 430,000 Americans every year.

Is there anyone who still believes that the drug warriors haven't completely sold out to their corporate masters?

 

Jason in VA

Jun 29, 2009

DC will finally get what the voters approved over 10 years ago. We are in the midst of a sea change in the politics of marijuana. Not surprising when you consider that a November 2005 nationwide Gallup poll showed 78% of Americans "support making marijuana legally available for doctors to prescribe in order to reduce pain and suffering"

 

Doobius40504

Jun 29, 2009

They can have a drink or 5 and go drive into someone ending their lives and then they want to lock someone up who chooses to smoke a joint instead...get real! Agree with "swapping places" and getting 5 years for an open container/illegal breath test!

 

Brad the Inhaler

Jun 30, 2009

Wasn't Bob Barr the Libertarian candidate for president recently? How does he square that with what he did here? I guess he's just a political opportunist.

Bruce Mirken is fighting the good fight. Everyone who values freedom owes him their thanks.

 

the valiant green ghost

Jul 1, 2009

Is what I'm hearing correct? Could this idiocracy be fading away to make way for an understanding and respect that is long overdue? A better nation, should we dare think even, a better way of life. No more families, jobs, lifes, reputations, and more crushed in the name of a level of stupidity that is far from comprehension. Hopefully this is the start of a progressive change for everyone, the sick, the dying, the everyday man. For everyone.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story