Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Jonetta Rose Barras: The pot and the skillet

By: Jonetta Rose Barras
Examiner Columnist
November 1, 2009

Do you love a farce? If your answer is yes, then you would have loved the roundtable convened Friday by D.C. Council members Harry Thomas, Kwame Brown, Mary Cheh and Marion Barry to probe how the D.C. Housing Authority awarded contracts to friends of Mayor Adrian M. Fenty.

Some background: Earlier this year, the Department of Parks and Recreation transferred capital funds totaling $86 million to the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development. The deputy mayor sent that money to the housing authority. The DCHA selected through competitive bid Banneker Ventures and Regan Associates as project managers to oversee renovation or construction of select recreation facilities. The management team doesn’t do the work; it hires general contractors. City Administrator Neil Albert reported the only contract signed thus far by DCHA was with Banneker Ventures/Regan Associates. The agency has paid out $6.2 million.

The drama surrounding the probe is heightened by the fact that Thomas and Cheh are up for re-election. Brown’s daddy and friends are trying to draft him for mayor, pitting him against Fenty. Barry still thinks he’s mayor.

Not surprisingly, the roundtable was filled with nauseating levels of political posturing. Legislators displayed varying degrees of indignation; accused the administration of circumventing procurement laws; and declared the contracts illegal.

But the council knows this isn’t the first time Fenty has used the housing agency as a conduit. In fact, Mayor Anthony A. Williams’ administration did the same. So what’s the difference? In the past, officials said, contracts of $1 million or more were forwarded to the council as required by law. But this time, DCHA did not send the parks and recreation agreements to the legislature. And, the contractors the agency engaged have personal connections to the mayor.

Truth be told, the council should never have permitted past use of the housing authority. The practice allows taxpayers’ money to be wasted.

DCHA gets a fee for its service. The project manager gets a fee. These payments come off the top before any construction begins. What’s worse, there are employees on the government’s payroll charged with similar duties. At the parks department, the original source for the money in question, there are 11 positions dedicated to capital projects. Despite such waste and duplication, the council didn’t rebuke the practice until the mayor’s friends rolled in.

Another roundtable is scheduled for later this week. No doubt legislators will use this controversy to demonstrate they are standing up to an executive who knows the power of his office, and uses it unapologetically.

Though council members huffed and puffed, there wasn’t any mention of their own contracting scandal — the one involving Barry. The Ward 8 legislator paid his girlfriend through a sole-source contract to present a plan for attacking poverty. Famed lawyer Robert

Bennett is investigating what Barry did and the legislature’s overall use of its procurement authority. A report was to have been issued by now.

That means we have a case of the pot calling the skillet black. It’s hard not to be amused by the entire spectacle.

Jonetta Rose Barras, hosts of WPFW’s “D.C. Politics With Jonetta,” can be reached at Rosebook1@aol.com.



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

*******

Nov 1, 2009

What comes to mind is the article about the mass firings at Park and Recreation when Fenty fired 10 people after already firing Ray and replacing him with Hartsock. Now could it be that he just wanted to get those 10 people out of the way because they knew too much?

 

Ward 5

Nov 2, 2009

Sooo because Tony Williams did it - it makes it acceptable? Also, (though I dont condone) if I remember correctly, the contract that Marion Barry gave to his "girlfriend" was no where near 1 million dollars.
I just LOVE how certain outlets make excuses for this type of behavior. It's not acceptable for ANYONE to circumvent the process to give money to their friends. You should be ashamed of yourself for being such a cheerleader for this type of foolishness.

 

Nov 2, 2009

Right on, Ward Five. How many people are being paid to endorse this deceitful thievery?

And for the love of all that is true, does EVERYTHING in DC have to go back to a discussion of Marion Barry? To former mayor Anthony Williams? The problem at hand is FENTY. What did you possible learn over California omlettes and tea that could justify the coddling in this 'article?'

The matter of 120 million dollars is serious business. GET A CLUE!

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story