Crime

[Print]  [Email]        

Few D.C. officials mourning United move to Pr. George’s

By: Michael Neibauer
Examiner Staff Writer
February 17, 2009

District leaders shed few tears Tuesday over the impending loss of D.C. United to Prince George’s County, and questioned why Maryland would put tens of millions of dollars behind a soccer stadium during a historically bad economic downturn.

“Lots of people would make the argument that we have higher priorities than soccer right now,” said D.C. Council Chairman Vincent Gray. “It isn’t as if we have a big bank account to put on the table.”

United owner Victor MacFarlane on Monday committed to relocate his team to a new, $195 million, 24,000-seat stadium in Prince George’s County. The announcement followed the recent collapse of negotiations between MacFarlane and D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty over a new stadium at Poplar Point.

Fenty never warmed to the United proposal. He bid the team adieu on Tuesday.

“While the District will greatly miss being home to the team, the administration congratulates both D.C. United and Prince George’s County on their successful negotiations,” Fenty said in a statement. “As the team finishes out its time playing at RFK, we will continue to do everything necessary to make their stay successful.”

In D.C. there has been a noticeable absence of indignity or disappointment over the loss of United, which draws more than 20,000 fans per game to RFK Stadium. Ward 8 Councilman Marion Barry is the exception, publicly slamming Fenty for his handling of United’s potential move to Poplar Point.

It is “reckless” and a “dereliction of responsibility” that Prince George’s leaders would throw their weight behind a stadium project but not behind a plan to fix their rotting health system, said at-large Councilman David Catania. Any politician who puts scarce resources into “something as frivolous as a soccer stadium has their priorities completely out of whack,” he said.

“While they’re off on this frolic and detour avoiding the tough choices, we’re suffering here in the District,” Catania said.

Maryland leaders say they will pay down the stadium debt with rent payments from the team and tax revenues generated by the project — the state would be on the hook if the taxes fell short. The project would create a “viable and wonderful entertainment venue that will actually increase the tax base” without requiring a dime from the county’s general fund, said county spokesman James Keary.

“I don’t know what he’s talking about,” Keary said of Catania. “I’m not sure he knows where Prince George’s County is.”

Jack Evans, the Ward 2 D.C. councilman, is resigned to the loss despite what he deemed the “enormously good” benefits of a professional sports franchise.

“Unfortunately,” Evans said, “I think the time will come when people look back at this and ask, ‘Why did this happen?’ ”



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Feb 18, 2009

Why does a 20,000 seat stadium cost almost $200 million?

 

Editor

Feb 18, 2009

I'm assuming Catania said "avoiding the TOUGH choices" and not "touch choices". Then again....he was talking about soccer - perhaps a freudian slip?

 

VA man 4 DCU

Feb 18, 2009

I think Marion Berry was the only person behind United because it was going to help his ward. It is shameful the way Fenty supported United while he was running for office, then turned a blind eye. I would have like to see United stay in DC to support all the fans in Virginia, Maryland and the District. This just shows that the Districts government officials really don’t care. Good for DCU

 

Big-K (DC)

Feb 18, 2009

Good riddance, Barry need to get his taxes in order.There are a lot of other ventures that would benefit Ward 8 without a soccer statdium that only benifit the team owners.Those wealthy owners of the Soccer team need to finamce their own hope to be money maker and besides, I don't like soccer any way.

 

David

Feb 18, 2009

What I don't get is how a person investing a billion dollars in DC is pledged full support by a mayoral candidate, but then once elected the mayor washes his hands of it. People up in Ward Four call him One Term Fenty.

 

JD

Feb 18, 2009

What's next? Pop Warner moving from DC to Maryland? We don't want them. And this notion of job creation? give me a break. No one is impressed about job creation as a result of their move. The move will create political clout. The sorry Redskins already moved to Maryland. DC can keep the Wizards as well.

 

Doug Smith

Feb 18, 2009

When you factor in the total cost of the project: infrastructure improvements--water, electrical, roads--and the stadium itself it comes to about $200M. The nice thing here is, unlike the bad baseball park deal in D.C., the county is not going to pay for this. The team owners are paying 25% of the cost. With 80 events planned at the new stadium annually it will pay for itself with new tax revenue in a few years. Again, totally unlike the bad baseball stadium deal in D.C.

 

BiLL

Feb 18, 2009

I'm sorry to see DC United go. I was hoping the would have built a nice urban stadium along the Anacostia. Stadiums have a way of attracting development around them (Verizon Center, and the growth around Nationals Park) and through that development generating tax revenue. Those condos near the ballpark -- they're paying property taxes and the new residents pay DC income taxes. What was there before didn't offer any benefits.

 

SD in DC

Feb 18, 2009

On the plus side, United's moving will provide one more reason to spend weekends watching the winners we've really missed -- the Washington Freedom.

 

ggh

Feb 18, 2009

Re: On the plus side, United's moving will provide one more reason to spend weekends watching the winners we've really missed -- the Washington Freedom. ----- Sorry, the Washington Freedom will be playing in the new DC United stadium in PG County. DC blew it... the stadium was to be paid for by the club... not DC. PG County will reap the rewards.

 

Javier Solares

Feb 18, 2009

Fenty cost the residents of Ward 8 huge and Catania is a classless jerk.

 

Chris Metzler

Feb 18, 2009

Wow. I hadn't thought David Catania was so classless. Live and learn, I guess.

 

EvWill

Feb 19, 2009

Except for a few doubleheaders (maybe) with DC United over the next few years, the new Washington Freedom won't play in the District of Columbia at all.

 

ragga

Feb 19, 2009

Well Mr. Catania I guess the Baseball Stadium is generating all the money and Jobs with all those empty seats....YOU Politician have too power, Ward 8..first it was DC General now DC United.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Slideshow: Washington area snow photos

Here are some of the best snow photos in the DC area from the Associated Press, the Examiner' s own Andrew Harnik and courtesy photos from Kathleen Dellinger: Full story

Politics

Rep. John Murtha dies at 77

A spokesman says Democratic Rep. John Murtha of... Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story