Crime

[Print]  [Email]        

Former NPR editor gets no prison time in child porn case

By: Scott McCabe
Examiner Staff Writer
July 17, 2009

The former NPR science editor who pleaded guilty to downloading videos of young children being raped will not have to spend any time in prison, a federal D.C. judge ruled Thursday.

Cheers, tears and claps erupted in the packed courtroom when U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Huvelle announced she was going to spare David Malakoff from the six to eight years in prison that he was facing based on federal guidelines.

"I say, 'What further pound of flesh is needed to achieve the goal of punishment?'" asked Huvelle.

In explaining the exceptional step of sentencing below the guidelines, the judge said Malakoff had already thrown away a successful career and has to live with the stigma of being a sex offender for most of the rest of his life. But the strongest argument for the lesser sentence, Huvelle said, was that Malakoff had been raped as a 9-year-old boy and he had looked at the child pornography over five hours last year to relive his own rape.

Malakoff admitted to downloading eight videos on his National Public Radio laptop while in Pittsburgh. The images, which contained violent sexual acts against children younger than 12 years old, were viewed over about five hours. Technical workers at NPR discovered them last summer after Malakoff took the laptop to them for repair.

Huvelle ordered Malakoff to five years probation, a fine of $5,000, 600 hours of community service, and he will have to register as a sex offender for 25 years.

Before the judge's decision, Malakoff, 46, apologized to the court for watching the videos.

"I am ashamed. I am horrified. Most of all because I know their story. I have made their lives worse. I am so sorry," Malakoff said. He said he will be haunted forever by the images of the children being raped, "their distant eyes, their blank faces."

Assistant U.S. Attorney Bridgette Crafton read a statement by a girl who was raped by her father as a 10- and 11- year-old and whose videos Malakoff downloaded on his NPR laptop computer. The girl, who is now 19, described the horrors of her childhood. She said the pain she suffers will be with her forever.

"Each person who has found enjoyment in these sick images needs to be brought to justice," she wrote. "They are dangerous and even though I don't know them, they are hurting me still. They have exploited me in the most horrible way. Please bring them to some real justice."

Huvelle ordered Malakoff to write a letter about his own experience to the young girl.

"You have more in common than you think or she thinks," Huvelle told Malakoff.

smccabe@washingtonexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Ken Maize

Jul 16, 2009

This was a just and magnanimous sentence. I was one of the 100s of people who wrote in David's behalf. I've worked with him and known him for over 20 years.
He is a good man, a fine father, and (I didn't know until this episode) a tortured soul. Jail time would have accomplished nothing in this case and would have been, indeed, an injustice.

 

ChildDefense

Jul 16, 2009

So the desecration for enjoyment on tape of children has no jail penalty? That's criminal.

 

jwp

Jul 17, 2009

A jail sentence clearly would have served no purpose here. Thank goodness for an enlightened and courageous judgment

 

JK

Jul 17, 2009

There are those who desecrate children by making and/or regularly watching porn for money or pleasure.
And there are those who some rainy day want to know what child porn looks like, download a few movies and delete them after being horrified.
Not letting a judge distinguish between these two wildly different categories would be absurd, quite frankly. So hurray for the judge in this case. It's about time people got to their senses.

 

Daddy-man

Jul 17, 2009

Are you people friggin nuts. This man should be serving jail time. Anything that remotely harms a child in any way should be punished. I was severely beaten as a child many times and would never hurt a child because I still remember what it felt like crying in the dark.

 

Daddy-man

Jul 17, 2009

As a child I was severly beaten on many occasions and would never harm a child in any way. I still remember what it feels like to cry in the dark and hold your hand over your mouth so as not to get more of a beating. This man should go to jail.

 

Unbelievable

Jul 17, 2009

Yes, JK, there are those who "some rainy day want to know what child porn looks like," and they are called criminals. The former group you describe are criminals, too, plying their trade for the latter. I find it disgusting that Malakoff has been painted (effectively, it now seems) as the victim in this case. Wonder how emphatic his supporters' clapping and tears of joy would have been if the children victimized for his "rainy day" pleasure were present in the courtroom, too.

 

jpatt

Jul 20, 2009

Five-hours worth. Poor child of God, tortured, blank stare. I bet he is sorry, sorry he was caught, that's about all.

 

HSG

Jul 20, 2009

Wow, this guy played this judge like a fiddle, and got off.

No person who has been a victim of ANY molestation/rape as a child would "Malakoff admitted to downloading eight videos on his National Public Radio laptop while in Pittsburgh. The images, which contained violent sexual acts against children younger than 12 years old, were viewed over about five hours."

If you believe that then you need to rethink your values.

 

cath

Jul 22, 2009

Five hours?! Are yall idiots or what! The man is sick! So he hid it well, so he experienced something similar and WANTED TO RE-LIVE IT!!!!! Are you nuts? He belongs in jail, I don't care want liberal organization he worked for! We are entitiled to be safe from this sick, sick person!

 

crazy

Jul 23, 2009

ok so just because he was raped when he was little makes it ok for him to not get jail time? Does that mean a kid who's father was killed by a gunman can kill someone else and not get any jail time?

FREAKIN RIDICULOUS.

 

Sep 1, 2009

You don't have to enjoy everything you see. Who enjoys watching acts of terrorism on the news? If looking at a monitor is crime, everybody on the net is guilty. If you saw the faces of the Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs, you must be a murderer. Looks like the Chinese are right. Maybe we should cover up all crime. If he told a psychiatrist about his ordeal would he be guilty as well? Or somebody could show me the line where it says he molested a child.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story