People

[Print]  [Email]        

D.C. Council hardens line on handouts to nonprofits

By: Michael Neibauer
Examiner Staff Writer
January 6, 2009

Nonprofits like the D.C. Central Kitchen, above, could be hit hard by new rules restricting city funds for nonprofits. (Examiner File)
The D.C. Council will cap earmark amounts and bar nonprofits from collecting grants in consecutive years under recently adopted budget rules that some organizations fear could devastate their capacities to do good in the community.

“This is a way for us to wean ourselves off this work around [of the contracting and procurement process],” said at-large Councilman David Catania, chairman of the health committee. “And it might be tough medicine, to be honest.”

Approved Friday during the council’s organizational meeting, the rules limit all future earmarks to $250,000, or $1 million for capital projects. They prohibit nonprofits, starting in fiscal 2011, from garnering grants in consecutive years. And they require recipients to undergo audits and submit documentation to prove they have paid their taxes and are spending the money as advertised.

The rules will spur competition for meager taxpayer dollars, open the door for nonprofits that have been locked out in past years, and protect the grant system from fraud, said Council Chairman Vincent Gray.

“We leave ourselves highly vulnerable, it seems to me, as an institution without beginning to place some guideposts around it,” Gray said.

But critics said the new rules could devastate some nonprofits that have come to rely on earmarks for their annual operations. Ward 3 Councilwoman Mary Cheh warned the council should not limit its authority to keep certain organizations, ones that do critical work, afloat. Several groups “would be in dire trouble if they did not receive a grant the following year,” said Ward 2 Councilman Jack Evans.

The council distributed $56 million to 125 grantees as part of the fiscal 2009 budget, including a controversial $10 million handout to Ford’s Theatre, a federally owned facility.

The $250,000 received by the D.C. Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy in 2009 was one-third of the group’s operating budget, said Brenda Rhodes Miller, the campaign’s executive director. The Capital Breast Care Center collected $500,000 this year, which “goes directly into providing a safety net for women who are at a high risk for breast cancer in the city,” said Beth Beck, the center’s executive director.

Losing that money, both women said, would drastically affect their capacities to provide service.

Michael Curtin Jr., chief executive officer of the D.C. Central Kitchen, said the nonprofit tries “never to rely on any funding that we get from any source.” But the council, he said, should be wary of making rules that might harm those groups that do the best work.


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Jan 6, 2009

I can appreciate the need to make sure that the nonprofits are running a clean efficient operation. (Oh, and they don't pay taxes, fyi...) But this might be going too far. I've worked for a nonprofit that received a small amt from the City - it was a small nonprofit. And without that money 2 years in a row, we would have had to go out of business. End of story. There's got to be a better way.

 

Robinson

Jan 6, 2009

The stated goals of the new rule appear reasonable: taxes paid, clean audit, money properly spent. Some non-profits are in competition with government offices providing the identical services, and divert their energies toward replacing the government office. Why? To secure funding, to get jobs, to promote particular philosophies of their liking, and to subjectively sway services toward particular groups. They come to Council Hearings and say how they can perform cheaper. However, they have never been under the same or similiar reporting requirements as govt agencies and govt employees. This rule is timely and may stop unnecessary competition among non-profits and make better use of the city's resources.

 

Patrice

Jan 6, 2009

This is very short sited of the DC Council. The loss of funding from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to DC non-profits has been very hard on the non-profit community. As a District resident, home owner and tax payer, I would rather fund the non-profit community than give breaks to developers and others who aren't making a difference in the lives of our most vunerable citizens. We are going to be judged on how we treat our poorest residents, and right now we aren't treating them very well. A banker once told me tha money is like manure and it was only good when you spread it around. The City Council needs to do just that spread it around. Patrice

 

Ramon

Jan 6, 2009

Interesting article

 

Tom

Jan 6, 2009

The timing seems interesting. Nonprofits are scrambling at a time when demands on their services are rising and donations are down because of the mess on Wall Street. So who should suffer, the Wall Street guys, no but those nonprofits serving the poor. I work with a nonprofit that got a 2009 grant but hasn't seen a penny yet. They are totally above board but now they have no money and a warning in the form of this new rules. Couldn't they have at least sent the money first?

 

Tom Smith

Jan 6, 2009

This makes no sense. Rather than doing the hard work of making choices about how city funds are used to meet unmet public needs, the Council adopts a blanket policy that enables them to avoid decision-making and avoid political heat. Sometimes, I think this Council does not operate in the real world.

 

Jan 6, 2009

The district has undermanaged its direct community services for decades, and in essence has outsourced to non-profits, expecting them to step in and pick up its slack. Now they are cutting back the funding that is allotted to these organizations, most of which operate on a very limited budget. I fully support setting performance standards for non-profits, but elimination of city funding from 1 year to the next, regardless of societal benefit, is reckless. It will cause many worthy organizations to have to stop (or significantly cut back on) services. How will the city fill in the void left for all those organizations that provide thousands of meals for the hungry, and a safe environment for our most vulnerable citizens (our veterans, mentally ill, etc.)? A "one size fits all" cut to non-profits is unrealistic and detrimental to the health of our community.

 

Maureen Holla

Jan 7, 2009

The article continues to call these "grants." I see them more as payment for non-profits doing the difficult work that government doesn't or can't do. What will happen, is there will be less quality services. Should the government then run the programs or isn't it preferably that thrifty, able and passionate non-profits get supported with government dollars to get it done. I see it as payment for services rendered, not a hand out.

 

Mike Licht

Jan 7, 2009

The Council should not just cap earmarks -- it should eliminate them completely. DC has only had earmarks for about six years, but they have metastasized. The Council needs to fund the regranting agencies adequately then get out of the way, and redirect fund seekers through the competitive grants process. Earmarks do not just waste public money; they waste Council time and energy.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Slideshow: Washington area snow photos

Here are some of the best snow photos in the DC area from the Associated Press, the Examiner' s own Andrew Harnik and courtesy photos from Kathleen Dellinger: Full story

Politics

Rep. John Murtha dies at 77

A spokesman says Democratic Rep. John Murtha of... Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story