On Wednesday, House Republicans will meet behind closed doors to discuss how the conference should address immigration reform. The editors of the two most influential conservative opinion publications in the nation, National Review‘s Rich Lowry and The Weekly Standard‘s William Kristol, have a simple message for those meeting Wednesday: Kill the Bill. Under a joint by-line in both publications, Kristol and Lowry write:

There is no case for the bill, and certainly no urgency to pass it. … The case against the bill has been as responsible as it has been damning.

The bill’s first fatal deficiency is that it doesn’t solve the illegal-immigration problem. The enforcement provisions are riddled with exceptions, loopholes, and waivers. Every indication is that they are for show and will be disregarded, just as prior notional requirements to build a fence or an entry/exit visa system have been—and just as President Obama has recently announced he’s ignoring aspects of Obamacare that are inconvenient to enforce on schedule. … Marco Rubio says he doesn’t want to have to come back ten years from now and deal with the same illegal-immigration problem. But that’s exactly what the CBO says will happen under his own bill. According to the CBO analysis of the bill, it will reduce illegal immigration by as little as a third or by half at most. By one estimate, this means there will be about 7.5 million illegal immigrants here in ten years. And this is under the implausible assumption that the Obama administration would administer the law as written.

The bill’s changes in legal immigration are just as ill considered. Everyone professes to agree that our system should be tilted toward high-skilled immigration, but the Gang of Eight bill unleashes a flood of additional low-skilled immigration. The last thing low-skilled native and immigrant workers already here should have to deal with is wage-depressing competition from newly arriving workers.

Finally, there is the sheer size of the bill and the hasty manner in which it was amended and passed. Conservatives have eloquently and convincingly made the case against bills like this during the Obama years. Such bills reflect a mistaken belief in central planning and in practice become a stew of deals, payoffs, waivers, and special-interest breaks. Why would House Republicans now sign off on this kind of lawmaking? If you think Obamacare and Dodd-Frank are going swimmingly, you’ll love the Gang of Eight bill. It’s the opposite of conservative reform, which simplifies and limits government, strengthens the rule of law, and empowers citizens.

The left’s game plan
As united as conservatives look on the issue right now, Democrats are still not giving up on Obama’s top second-term agenda item. They are circulating a list of 99 House Republicans that they believe they can flip to their side. The memo does not envision getting any of these Republicans to sign a discharge petition that would force a floor vote on the Senate bill. Instead, the hope seems to be that House Speaker Boehner, R-Ohio, can be pressured into defying his conference and calling up the Senate bill for an up or down vote.

For his part, Boehner insisted again Monday that that option is off the table. “I’ve made it clear and I’ll make it clear again, the House does not intend to take up the Senate bill. The House is going to do its own job in developing an immigration bill.”

Unless something happens tomorrow to change Boehner’s mind, it still appears the Senate bill is dead in the House.

From The Washington Examiner
Editorial: Abolish the IRS, don’t ‘reform’ it
Phil Klein: A huge opening for GOP on Obamacare
Conn Carroll: Republicans ask CBO for new Obamacare score after mandate delay
David Drucker: Ted Cruz says GOP did ‘weepingly terrible job’ defining itself to Hispanics, minorities
Sean Higgins: SEIU targets 10 House Republicans with immigration ad buy
Joel Gehrke: Obama team ‘will take the time necessary’ to decide if military coup took place in Egypt
Sean Lengell: Capitol Hill conflicted over whether to withdraw aid to Egypt
Susan Crabtree: In quandary, Edward Snowden weighs asylum options
Joseph Lawler:
 There are few signs that the feared sequester has hurt job growth
Ashe Schow: America’s second-largest employer is a temp agency
Tim Mak: GOP tries to drive wedge between Democrats on student loans
Susan Ferrechio: Perry won’t run for fourth term as Texas governor — Is presidential bid next? 

In Other News
The Wall Street Journal, Dozens Killed in Egypt Clashes: Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood accused the country’s military of massacring dozens of its supporters during dawntime prayers, as Egypt’s deadliest clashes in years between the army and Islamists pushed the country toward armed conflict.
The New York Times, U.S. Considers Faster Pullout in Afghanistan: President Obama, frustrated in his dealings with President Karzai, is considering speeding up troop withdrawals from Afghanistan and even leaving no American troops after 2014.
McClathchy Newspapers, Military furloughs begin, aim to reduce $1.8 billion in spending: Eleven-day furloughs for military civilian employees began Monday; the Defense Department estimates the furloughs will save $1.8 billion, part of the automatic spending cuts — referred to as the “sequester” — imposed across the federal government.
National Journal, The IRS Mistakenly Exposed Thousands of Social Security Numbers: The Internal Revenue Service exposed “tens of thousands” of Social Security numbers, according to a recent audit by the independent transparency and public-domain group Public.Resource.org.

Lefty Playbook
Think Progress says Koch Brothers To Pour Millions Into Obamacare Misinformation Campaign
Ezra Klein points out that Obama’s decision to ignore the law makes it very easy to implement Obamacare.
Greg Sarget reports on which Republicans Democrats are targeting to vote for amnesty.

Righty Playbook
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., on How the House Can Get Immigration Reform Right
Michael Cannon explains why Obama’s decision to delay the employer mandate is illegal.
Michael McConnell explains why Obama’s decision to delay the employer mandate is illegal.