You won’t see MSNBC promoting this, but buried deep within their most recent poll are some results indicating that Americans are not only not afraid of the sequester, but want even deeper spending cuts.
First, MSNBC asks this question:
Now, as you may know, because Congress could not agree on how to reduce the federal deficit, starting next month there will be automatic cuts from the federal budget of six hundred billion dollars from the military budget and an equal total of six hundred billion dollars in cuts from non-military government programs and services. Several programs and services are exempt, such as Social Security, but for all other non-exempt programs the cuts are across-the-board so that agencies are not able to choose how much to cut from specific programs. Do you think this set of automatic spending cuts in the military and non-military programs are a good idea, a bad idea, or do you not know enough about this issue to have an opinion at this time?
Note how they use an inflated $600 billion figure that a) includes interest savings that aren’t even real cuts, and b) is spread out over ten years which MSNBC fails to mention. Not surprisingly, with this blatant liberal spin, only 21 percent describe the cuts as a good idea while 52 percent said it was a bad idea. But then MSNBC asked, “To deal with the deficit, which of the following three options would you favor Congress moving ahead with – the current set of automatic spending cuts, a plan that has more spending cuts, or a plan that has fewer spending cuts?”
While only 14 percent chose the current level of automatic cuts, a whopping 39 percent said the would prefer a plan with MORE cuts. Just 37 percent said they wanted fewer cuts. That is a 53 percent majority in favor of the current level of cuts or more.
Finally, MSNBC asked the following much more fair statement about the sequester:
Which of the following two statements about the automatic spending cuts that are set to go into place next month comes closest to your point of view? (ROTATE STATEMENTS.)
Statement A: These spending cuts are too severe and will hurt our economy. The President and Congress need to find a way to reduce our deficit by working together to avoid this from happening.
Statement B: Washington has become too partisan and the President and Congress cannot reach an agreement on reducing our deficit. Allowing these spending cuts to go into place may not be perfect, but it is time for dramatic measures to reduce the deficit.
While 50 percent of Americans did choose “working together to avoid this from happening” a very respectable 46 percent said “Allowing these spending cuts to go into place may not be perfect, but it is time for dramatic measures to reduce the deficit.”
These are not the poll results Obama needs to get House Republicans to cave on tax hikes.
From The Washington Examiner
Examiner Editorial: Government Accountability Office says Obamacare may add 62 trillion dimes to deficit
Conn Carroll: California’s expensive education failure
Joel Gehrke: Treasury has created incentive for companies to seek bailouts
Tim Carney: The prairie populist who added an ‘oversized chandelier’ to his four-and-a-half-bath home in McLean
Michael Barone: Discord and disarray won’t help Obama’s legacy
Byron York: With cuts looming, what has Obama done to reduce cost of presidential travel?
Phil Klein: If cost-containment fails, Obamacare will be a budget buster
In Other News
The Wall Street Journal, California Girds for Electricity Woes: California is weighing how to avoid a looming electricity crisis that could be brought on by the peculiar stresses placed on its network as it relies increasingly on wind and solar power.
The Wall Street Journal, Builders Fuel Home Sale Rise: Sales of new homes are surging in the U.S as nation’s home builders have mastered the art of selling, even to cash-poor buyers or those with spotty credit histories.
The Wall Street Journal, Bernanke Affirms Bond Buying: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke came down firmly in favor of continuing the central bank’s bond-buying programs, even as he acknowledged concerns that the efforts might encourage risk-taking that could someday destabilize markets or the economy.
Forbes, Chris Christie Says Yes To Obamacare Medicaid Expansion: New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has concluded that accepting the expanded Medicaid portion of the Affordable Care Act for New Jersey is, in the Governor’s words, “the smart thing to do for our fiscal and public health.”
The New York Times, Justices Turn Back Challenge to Broader U.S. Eavesdropping: The Supreme Court on Tuesday turned back a challenge to a federal law that broadened the government’s power to eavesdrop on international phone calls and e-mails.
The New York Times, Austerity Kills Government Jobs as Cuts to Budgets Loom: The federal government, the nation’s largest consumer and investor, is cutting back at a pace exceeded in the last half-century only by the military demobilizations after the Vietnam War and the cold war.
The Washington Post, Sequester will sock a vulnerable economy: The sequester is coming at a particularly inopportune time in the still-fragile U.S. recovery, it promises to bite consumers and business activity quickly, and the Washington area will feel its pain acutely.
The Washington Post, U.S. moves toward providing direct aid to Syrian rebels: The Obama administration is moving toward a major policy shift on Syria that could provide rebels there with equipment such as body armor and armored vehicles, and possibly military training, and could send humanitarian assistance directly to Syria’s opposition political coalition, according to U.S. and European officials.
A multimillion-dollar ad blitz by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg helped elect Robin Kelly to replace former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.
Think Progress on Why Everything Republicans Are Saying About The Sequester Is Wrong
Greg Sargent on Why White House is content to wait Republicans out
Jay Cost on how Republicans can win in 2014
The Heritage Foundation: Obama 2013 Tax Increase Twice as Large as Looming Sequestration
Steven Camarota notes that poor immigrants use welfare more