Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Keep the government from snooping in our e-mail

Examiner Editorial
-
April 9, 2009

Civilian libertarians were apoplectic over former President George W. Bush’s “warrantless wiretap” program, which sought to monitor communications from terrorist networks overseas. So why are they not screaming bloody murder now that President Barack Obama appears slated to receive unprecedented power to monitor all Internet traffic without a warrant and to even shut the system down completely on the pretext of national security? The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 - introduced by Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-WV, and cosponsor Olympia Snowe, R-ME - bypasses all existing privacy laws and allows White House political operatives to tap into any online communication without a warrant, including banking, medical, and business records and personal e-mail conversations. This amounts to warrantless wiretaps on steroids, directed at U.S. citizens instead of foreign terrorists.

The bill gives the Secretary of Commerce and a new national cybersecurity czar power to shut down all Internet transmissions in the event of a yet-to-be defined “cyber emergency.” This is a dangerous power, even for a president who in a 2008 campaign appearance at Dartmouth College harshly criticized Bush for anti-terrorist “wiretaps without warrants,” and promised that if elected he would leave such policies behind.
There’s no doubt that serious deficiencies in cyber security remain a major threat to national security. Just this week, The Wall Street Journal reported that our electric grid has already been penetrated by Russian and Chinese hackers. But centralized eavesdropping in Washington and government licensing of cyber- security specialists is exactly the wrong approach. Jennifer Granick, director of civil liberties at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says such an approach would actually make the Internet even more vulnerable by “basically establish[ing] a path for the bad guys to skip down.” The best response to increasing cyber threats, then, is less centralization - not more. This bill, which is a full frontal assault on our First Amendment rights, should be deleted from the congressional agenda immediately. Americans should tell President Obama and members of Congress in no uncertain terms that their cyber-security agents will get inside our e-mail only after they pry our cold, dead hands away from our keypads.


beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...

Clearly it's just a joke, but a bad joke. Washington Post writer Monica Hesse writes of the irresistible nature of the Twilight book series about vampires written primarily for...


Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Broadsword

Apr 10, 2009

"..why are they not screaming bloody murder now"? Because the guiding principle then was not any right to privacy but 'If Bush does it, it must be wrong'. And this, "...promised that if elected he would leave such policies behind." His 'click to erase' promises are not worth the teleprompter they are displayed upon. Remember the "I couldn't disown my pastor any more than I could disown my own mother" screen shot? Or the "I will end the Iraq war responsibly and bring the troops home is 16 months"? Or, "When I'm President, no one will ever have to believe anything force fed to them by someone holding a spoon too small for the oatmeal bowl..." well, maybe not that one.

 

MJN1957

Apr 10, 2009

To those who voted to the Messiah; You wanted Him, you got Him, you are owned by Him... What tools-n-fools you are...

 

geekamongus

Apr 10, 2009

If I'm not mistaken, the president has nothing to do with this bill until it is sitting on his desk waiting to be signed. So why is everyone rushing to conclude that he agrees with it? Until it is a law, it is just a bill, and means nothing. Get over yourselves.

 

TomT

Apr 10, 2009

Why is anybody surprised by this? For years I was told how the left was for free speech, but look at College campuses. The most liberal and most speech oppressed places in the US. The left only wants power. Their thinking goes something like this; when everything is perfect and we are in control, then we will do the right thing. This is why they are so tolerant of the corruption with in their public officials. The problem is that things are never perfect and their lust for power is never satisified.

 

MattinChicago

Apr 10, 2009

Geekamongus: Are you honestly that naive? "The president has nothing to do with this bill"? As the top ranking Democrat in the country as well as the President, you honestly believe that he had no input in this bill? He's just innocent and those mean Democrats in Congress are going to make him sign it? Or better yet, it is the fault of the Republican minority? Face it cool-aid lover, you've been had. Obama could care a less about civil liberties... it was only a problem before because Bush did it... and now you know it is true. Hypocrisy... America's greatest export in the 21st century.

 

Chris_In_Toronto

Apr 10, 2009

Obama is a snake.

 

Sagan

Apr 10, 2009

MJN1957: Oh, I guess McCain and Palin would be better then?

 

Stevie Nichts

Apr 10, 2009

Sagan: Why don't you leave the strawman at home and address the issue?

 

Ratonis

Apr 10, 2009

All of the warnings about Obama's totalitarian impulses are in fact coming to fruition. And this from a guy who is so protected from scrutiny that we can't even access his academic records. What is he hiding? He's a fraud, and a dangerous one.

 

Greg

Apr 10, 2009

Say hello to the new boss, same as the old boss.

 

Libertarian

Apr 10, 2009

I'm one of those civil libertarians, and I am screaming about what Obama is doing now just as when Bush was doing it.

 

Bart

Apr 10, 2009

First, they pass a law allowing them to take it away. Next, they intrude to see if it should be taken away or monitored. Next, they monitor, identify dissidents, then take you away. Eventually in any socialist/communist country, you have no personal freedoms. We are headed toward the cliffs of socialism with the panic of lemmings and there are too many who welcome the jump.

 

Tweedledum_or_Tweedledee

Apr 10, 2009

Let's face it, neither the Republocrats or Demopublicans are committed to upholding the Bill of Rights. Selected members of the duopoly may be, but certainly not the duopoly's presidents. Stop voting for Tweedledum or Tweedledee. Start voting for third party alternatives. Boycott the duopoly!

 

snoop Doggy

Apr 11, 2009

Don't matter they already have the snoop technology. On your PC and phones

 

High-church libertarian curmudgeon

Apr 12, 2009

New boss, same as the old. Don't blame me; I listened to the man so I stayed home. http://aconservativesiteforpeace.info

 

Sigivald

Apr 13, 2009

WHat section of S.773 authorizes "email snooping"? I've read the bill and I see nothing of the sort.

 

keithjonesblog

Apr 14, 2009

Spying is only wrong to a modern liberal if a non-liberal is the one doing it. Civil liberties are only important when they are in harmony with liberal motives, or can be used against conservative ideas.

 

sam

Aug 28, 2009

This is what you get when you vote a socialist into office.

 

Geekamongus

Nov 18, 2009

The bill has gone nowhere. This is another example of people getting upset about "socialist takeovers" and other such rubbish, and the media running with it. Stop listning to the lies, people, and think for yourselves.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Houston Rockets coach Rick Adelman, center, reacts with his staff Jack Sikma, left, and Elston Turner, right, to a called foul against his team as they play the Atlanta Hawks during the third quarter ...

Tracy McGrady says he's ready to play, Rockets believe it's still too soon after knee surgery

Tracy McGrady is eager to play. The Houston Rockets say he'll have to wait. Full story

Economy

NC state treasurer issues gift ban for employees, limits on soliciting for charity

State Treasurer Janet Cowell unveiled new rules Friday banning employees from taking gifts from companies that do substantial business with the agency and setting a limit on charitable solicitations. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story