Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

EXAMINER EDITORIAL HOT ZONE: How many more jobs will Obama kill?

By: EXAMINER EDITORIAL HOT ZONE
-
November 6, 2009

Unemployment has hit 10.2 percent, the highest level since the 1983 recession. Obama administration officials will no doubt try to spin this latest bad economic news by noting that unemployment is typically a "lagging indicator." That was true in the old days, but it won't cut it in the age of the global economy and Internet-driven 24/7 news cycle. Unemployment may now be something of a leading indicator because business executives make decisions about whether to invest in new jobs much more quickly and based on vastly more data.

As Examiner columnist and practicing economist Irwin M. Stelzer notes in today's edition, some of the traditional signs of recovery look positive. But businesses aren't investing in new jobs, they are instead hoarding cash, waiting for the next shoe to drop in Washington on such issues as health care reform, cap-and-trade, and federal taxes, spending and deficits.  "There is a nagging fear among those who closely watch not only the economy but govenment policy that these nascent economic forces might be murdered in their crib by the current administration," Stelzer notes.

It's time for Obama and Democratic congressional leaders Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to step back from their radical plans to vastly expand federal power, spending, deficits and taxes, and instead reach out to conservatives in both parties who understand how to make the economy grow with tax cuts, reduced bureaucracy, and lower government spending. They also understand the urgency of achieving U.S. energy independence by quickly adopting the "all-of-the-above" policy of freeing America's abundant conventional energy resources while encouraging alternative sources. In other words, stop playing ideological games and get serious about restoring economic growth before millions more jobs are lost.    



beltway confidential

The Delegate: Is she on your friends list? As the House Homeland Security Committee today split the difference between the utter absurdity of investigating a party and the...

An amendment to a bill currently being considered by the Senate would deny ordinary citizens doing vital investigations in the public interest the same legal protections as...

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs seems to have a real problem with Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Either that or Gibbs is so dim that he doesn't realize that when he...

Tomorrow morning at 7:30 am, Hillsdale College President Dr. Larry P. Arnn will be giving a lecture on “Self-Government or Czarist Bureaucracy?” at the Heritage...




Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Mad_as_H

Nov 6, 2009

Obama, Pelosi and Reid are hell bent on ruining our country to jam their agendas (and I don't think Obama's is the same as theirs, it's much worse) on the American public.

Our only hope is the ballot box and sooner rather than later or our country is in for bigger problems then unemployment.

 

markit8dude

Nov 6, 2009

'Get serious about restoring economic growth'?

Pelosi (D - California) is pushing, without the 72 hour window available online before voting for a $1.2 trillion health INSURANCE bill to provide insurance for ~12% of the population, or 36,000,000 people. The cost over a decade is $3.3 million PER PERSON!

Boxer (D California) is attempting to give legs to the Crap and Trade bill with NO bipartisan support. Costing jobs, trillions as well in the long run.

The key is to try these people in a court of law or vote them out, from both sides of the aisle.. whatever comes first.

 

depaz

Nov 6, 2009

So much for "expect unemployment to hit 8%. . . . .) Guess he should have said ". . .EXCEED 8%". That would have been at least 1 campaign promise he kept.

 

my

Nov 6, 2009

The Obama administration and Congress are bunch and incompetent corrupt officials. All they do spend our money we haven't earn yet, eat kobi beef, all night dancing at the WH and fly on their jumbo jets. Time to VOTE OUT all these corrupt officials.

 

gbandy california

Nov 6, 2009

BOXER'S CAP AND TRADE WILL DESTROY THE US AND PUT THE FINAL NAIL IN THE COFFIN OF CALIFORNIA. THE CARBON TAX IN CALIFORNIA HAS COST US 750000 JOBS ALREADY AND NOW LOOK AT THE FINANCIAL CLIMATE IN CALIFORNIA. 10,2 IS ONLY THE START WE MUST REPLACE ALL SPEND POLITICIANS IN 2010

 

jake

Nov 6, 2009

The party in power wants to keep its power. It can only do that by changing America as we know it. All these bills are about democrat power.
The end is near.

 

BMF

Nov 6, 2009

Anyone care to guess how much the lavish Halloween bash at the White House costs the taxpayers?

Extravagant Kobe beef dinners, $250,000 date nights to New York, excessive travel costing millions per trip for no apparent purpose or tangible return, and the list goes on and on and on and...

Do you think Obama will get around to creating that job for the little people he keeps talking about--you know the shovel ready one to fill pot holes for a week?

Obama reminds me of the French aristocracy living large while the people suffered. That would be just before the people revolted and beheaded them all during the French revolution.

There is a revolution brewing at the ballot box in this country because the socialist agenda of the Democrats are obviously more important than jobs and prosperity for the people.

 

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

Nov 6, 2009

Unemployment is a _leading_ indicator of:
* mortgage defaults (household destruction)
* credit card defaults (deflation)
* sales drops (xmas bloodbath)
* illness (stress - health insurance)
* crime

But then, those things don't matter to the economy, yes?

 

Mo

Nov 6, 2009

3 or 4 or more MILLION people need to march (peacefully) on Washington DC NOW. We need massive turnouts, whatever it takes, to get this bunch of corrupt Marxists (I don't care which party) to pay attention. Wait until 2010? I keep reading that, but by then, if they pass health care, or cap-and-trade, the damage is done and maybe permanently.

It's time for Americans to realize we are being threatened from within, and just like Rome, which fell apart long before the Goths and Huns invaded, we're on the path of inner destruction, brought to us by the political class and the sick illiberal "liberal" totalitarian communists.

 

Renfield

Nov 6, 2009

Most top Dems wouldn't care if the unemployment rate hit 20%. They love crises, their most useful tool for ratcheting the nation to the left. Nancy Pelosi is quite willing to give up seats in next year's election to serve the glorious cause today.

Sometimes I think the Dems actually WANT economic chaos, racial strife, terrorist attacks, etc.

 

Charles R. Anderson

Nov 6, 2009

This editorial is dead-on correct. The economic wrongheadedness of Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and company boggles the rational mind. They are so wrongheaded, it is reasonable to believe that they actually wish to destroy the private sector and transfer all activity to the public sector. If they succeed, we will all be slaves, literally. Soon, they will use Mao's final method of suppressing our individuality and we will be known only by numbers. We will pass from thinking Atlas Shrugged deals with our decline to describing it as in Anthem.

 

lglegli

Nov 6, 2009

The Dems love a crisis. they love it when they have to move fast, there's lots of media and attention..and worst of all they lovwe it at the expense of the American peopel and its economy. They get a thrill from controversy and love upheaval...they do not care about the ills of this nation so long as they can win the initiativews that they put forth...even if it doen't work, they could care less...that Nobel Peace Prize was such a political ploy fed to us by the Dems and no one bought it...A true Nobel Peace Prize winner was Elie Wissel...the two are not in the same league...and he will never come close to that level.

 

publius

Nov 7, 2009

Obama's penchant for Eurosocialism is scaring the hell out of employers. In Euroland real unemployment has been 17% for 25 years and our fate is the same for four reasons:
o The implementation of Eurosocialism here.
o Bogus economic theories that have wrecked our economy - supply side, irresponsible deregulation, ending Glass Steagall, unregulated foreign trade
o Collaps of our K-12 education system - 50% of our students leave school functionally illiterate and with no job skills. Many are too fat and stupid to serve in the military.
o Exhaustion of our individual, corporate and governmental debt capacity - the great tail wind of adding more and more debt is over - although Obama's triumvirate of economically illiterate economic advisors have not yet grasped that fact.

 

Client-9

Nov 7, 2009

What's with that title? As if the economic debalce this administration inherited is the President's fault! What is this paper's contempt for the President?

I swore off The Washington Post for its pro-open-borders position it continually rammed down readers throats. I welcomed Examiner as a viable alternative. But that enthusiasm is quickly waning with every front-page "editorial" blasting the President's management abilities.

Where were you when his predecessor was leading the country into wars under false pretenses, lining Halliburton's pockets, and allowing "irrational exhuberance" and Bernie Madoff to wreck the economy? Probably listening to Rush Limbaugh on one of his OxyContin-fuelled tirades? Or in church swallowing the hypocrisy Ted Haggard was dishing out?

Pathetic!

 

ggordon

Nov 7, 2009


To Client 9 - when does it become Obama's economy? Typically economic decisions take 6 months to a year to filter in their effects. And it is an economic fact that raising taxes in a slow economy is horrible - and the Dems are planning or have already raised A LOT of taxes - and just wait for the Bush cuts to expire - a trillion dollar hit to the economy alone -

 

Jen

Nov 7, 2009

Highest figure since 1983... hmmm, who was the President then? St. Reagan? Of course, the recession then wasn't HIS fault, it was Carter's right? 10 months into this administration and people are castigating Obama for the economy. 2 years into Reagan's, same result, but he's still a God. Neo-Conservatives really do live in their own world.

 

St. Gadsden

Nov 7, 2009

The Marxists have the momentum now, don't expect them to give it up.

Things ARE going to get MUCH MUCH WORSE.

I believe the only way to change things now is by refreshing the tree.

 

Malvenue

Nov 7, 2009

The real question should be "How many more american soldiers will have to lose their lives before Obama makes a decision on conducting a WAR?"

 

coffee4closers

Nov 7, 2009

Jen,
The biggest Dif between Reagan and Obama is the hypocrisy of promises. Reagan promised the US citizens that America was STILL a great country to work and live in. Obama and his gang of liberal "children" are in charge of the candy store and have no idea WHAT TO DO. Carter exposed this country to diminished world status, bye bye Panama Canal, and Commies so close Reagan had to call the Marines into Granada. Oh, and maybe you were too young to remember, the 444 day Iranian hostage crisis ended on Reagan's first day on the job. Things that make you go HMMMM...

 

markit8dude

Nov 7, 2009

Jen -

President Ford lowered the misery index (unemployment plus inflation) from 16.36 when taking office to 12.68 when leaving. Carter said that was much too high. The misery index during the 1980 election? 20.15..!

UNemployment was 12.61% and the peanut farmer had no idea how to tackle inflation, amongst other things.

Reagan tackled INFLATION FIRST, thus people began spending more (i.e. creating jobs later).

By December 1983 inflation plummeted to 3.83% and unemployment fell below 8%.

Misery index when Reagan left office? 9.72, down from over 20! Inflation was 4.67%, whereas anything under 5% is considered healthy.

 

markit8dude

Nov 7, 2009

Jen -

Also, Reagan's tax cuts DOUBLED revenue before leaving office.

**The deficit had gone up due to a DEMOCRATICALLY LED HOUSE, which controls spending btw, saw more money coming in and figured/ invented new ways to spend it. When you get a chance, look into baseline budgeting..

 

buster

Nov 8, 2009

Libs are really scary when they talk economics. Most of them do not understand capitalism whatsoever and have no interest in understanding it. Everything they believe and love in their world exists at the behest of government.

The reality is that capitlaism has allowed them to enjoy a cushy lifestyle while they profess their loathing of it.

As for the "health care bill", look ahead at what it means people, it makes us literal SLAVES to the government. You can be be imprisoned for not producing for them (by means of buying their APPROVED insurance).

These are sick sick people in power and we need to weed them out very soon.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Matt Cassel fires a pass while on the run during the first quarter of an NFL football game against the San Diego Chargers, Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009, in San Diego. (AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi)

Broncos coach Josh McDaniels and Chiefs QB Matt Cassel reunite Sunday in AFC West rivalry

Josh McDaniels and Matt Cassel will catch up with each other this weekend, nine months after the idea of a reunion was first raised, changing the course of both men's careers. Full story

Economy

Economy

Stephanopoulos offered ABC morning job, no decision on whether he'll take it

An executive with knowledge of the negotiations says ABC News has offered George Stephanopoulos (STEFF'-uh-nop-oh-luss) the job of "Good Morning America" co-anchor, although ABC's political expert hasn't said he will take it. Full story