Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

FTC has no business in media business

Examiner Editorial
October 6, 2009

It all sounds so innocent and good-governmenty: The Federal Trade Commission will hold a workshop Dec. 1 and 2 concerning "How will journalism survive the Internet age?" An assembly of editors, owners, government officials, consumer advocates, advertisers and others is scheduled to discuss a dozen topics. Three ought to make the hair stand up on the necks of every journalist and anybody else who cares about the survival of freedom of the press:

»  Are new or changed government policies needed to support optimal amounts and types of journalism, including public affairs coverage?

»  Should the tax code be modified to provide special status or tax breaks to all or certain types of news organizations?

»  Should the federal government provide additional funding for news organizations?

The short answer to all three of these seemingly innocuous questions posed by federal regulators is: No and Hell No! The longer answer is no less simple: There is nothing in the Constitution -- zero, nada -- that authorizes government to fund private news organizations, to choose "certain types of news organizations" for special tax favors, or to define what are "optimal amounts and types of journalism," most especially not including "public affairs coverage."

People in journalism had better wake up now before this funeral train for press freedom leaves the station: There is no such thing as government support without government control. Period. Thus, the First Amendment's proscription of any law by Congress "respecting the freedom of the press" renders unconstitutional the very idea of the FTC even considering such a topic.

No self-respecting journalists should lend their endorsement to this workshop, and neither should any professional journalism organization. But it won't be enough just to boycott it; they must also condemn this event as loudly as possible and publish the facts about who proposed it and why. Journalists are kidding only themselves if they think the government will merely provide an innocent helping hand without becoming the controlling hand.

The issues to be discussed at the FTC workshop weren't chosen at random; somebody there has been thinking about this topic for some time. It probably took him about three seconds to realize the government will first have to define what kind of journalism "deserves" federal support.

Beyond that threshold question, there is nothing good for independent journalism. You cannot live by bribing the alligator to eat you last.



beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...

Clearly it's just a joke, but a bad joke. Washington Post writer Monica Hesse writes of the irresistible nature of the Twilight book series about vampires written primarily for...


Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Retired CPO

Oct 6, 2009

This is all a part and parcel of the fairness doctrine. The only thing fair to a Pregressive's mind(?) is fawning obeisance and unwavering loyalty to the fuhrer. This country was fomented and instigated by an unfettered press. It has foundered when the press fawned (FDR and WJC and BHO). You cannot have a controlled press any more than you should have a University without all sides of a question being discussed. Even where the "science" is settled, both sides need to be presented so that the individuals can legitimately believe. My question for the government press supporters is "WHY"?

 

Winston

Oct 6, 2009

What was it that ousted czar said about what a good job Hugo Chavez did with the press in Venezuela? Will NPR do a report on this conference? Maybe Ken Burns can film Bill Moyers doing a stand-up wrap around for his new documentary, "The Freeing of the Free Press". Maybe the Federal government can use eminent domain to take a Florida coastal island not yet donated to the Nature Coservancy as HQ for the new non-profit (but not non-political) tax exempt press corps.

 

depaz

Oct 7, 2009

The MSM should take a page out of Fox News book. Fox News, after all, is head and shoulders above the CNN, MSNBC, etc., in their ratings. Maybe it has something to do w/Fox's tag line - fair and balanced. Something MSM definitely isn't.

 

bob

Oct 8, 2009

Join the campaign to STOP the so-called “Fairness Doctrine”.
Tell Congress to defend free-market, free speech!

http://www.conservativeoutpost.com/campaign/cta/tell_congress_no_fairness_doctrine

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Graphic surveys NFL players concerning concussions

NFL Players Association opposes Goodell's call for players to report on teammates

The NFL Players Association opposes commissioner Roger Goodell's call for players to tell their teams' medical staffs if they think a teammate shows symptoms of a concussion, saying that is not an adequate solution. Full story

Economy

Barclays' investment banking unit forms joint venture for real estate acquisition

The investment banking division of Barclays Bank PLC said Friday it has formed a joint venture with Goff Capital Inc. to acquire Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership, a Texas-based office building owner. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story