Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Fuel efficient cars can kill you

Examiner Editorial
-
May 19, 2009

Forgive us for being the skunk at the White House party, but nobody there said anything about the most important consequence of President Obama’s widely lauded decision to increase the national Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) standard. Namely, that thousands more Americans will die or be grievously injured in auto accidents, thanks to the mandate that new vehicles average no less than 35.5 mpg by 2016. It’s a simple law of physics – weight is the enemy of fuel economy, so designing more fuel-efficient vehicles requires making them lighter. And people die or are injured more seriously when those lighter vehicles collide with the millions of heavier vehicles that will remain on the road for years to come.

Don’t simply take our word for it. Here are the facts, as reported by the Competitive Enterprise Institute in a study published in 2007: “A 2002 National Academy of Sciences study concluded that CAFE’s downsizing effect contributed to between 1,300 and 2,600 deaths in a single representative year, and to 10 times that many serious injuries. A 1989 Brookings-Harvard study estimated that CAFE caused a 14 to 27 percent increase in occupant fatalities, for an annual toll of 2,200 to 3,900 deaths. A 1999 USA Today analysis concluded that, over its lifetime, CAFE had resulted in 46,000 additional fatalities.” The grisly toll that will inevitably follow this latest CAFÉ increase will be a bloody testament to the maxim that government regulation always has unintended consequences.
 
Environmental extremists who have been pushing for higher CAFÉ standards for decades typically reject worries about increased deaths and injuries by claiming new technologies will make possible improved fuel efficiency without making vehicles less safe. Aside from the intrinsically speculative nature of that claim, however, no technology can repeal the laws of gravity, which dictate that smaller, lighter, less powerful vehicles always get better gas mileage. As long as government mandates higher fuel economy standards by a date certain, automakers will have to make smaller, lighter vehicles.
 
At least the president acknowledged one added cost of his decision, saying the price of a new vehicle will go up by an estimated $1,300. But he also claimed we will use $1.8 billion fewer barrels of oil, thanks to the higher standard. Those estimates ignore the reality that more lower and middle income families won’t be able to afford cars that meet the higher CAFÉ standard. So they will keep driving older, heavier, less fuel efficient and dirtier vehicles longer. Next: Subsidies for people who can’t afford cars designed by bureaucrats and environmentalists?
         
 
  


beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

keep it real

May 20, 2009

The title of your article screams propaganda. and basically it was all propaganda.

 

Edd Doerr

May 20, 2009

The reverse of "small cars are more dangerous" is "large cars inflict more damage". As cars are downsized and made more efficient there were be fewer "intimidator" cars and SUVs to cause damage. Vehicle safety could be further enhanced by strictly prohibiting cell phone use by drivers (save in the direst emergencies), using more speed cameras, making driver licensing more difficult, and more serverely punishing intoxicated drivers (as they do in the Scandinavian countries).

 

vcspinner

May 20, 2009

The title of this article should have been: Fuel inefficient cars can kill you. A big car hits a little car, and the little car gets the blame for the injuries?

 

Ralph Gizzip

May 20, 2009

The upside to all of this is that as more people are killed on the roadways there will be fewer people lining up to be a drain on Obamacare.

In Big Car v Little Car, you're right. Big Car wins. However, in Little Car v Little Car, everybody loses. Little cars don't have as much mass to absorb crash energy which in turn gets transmitted to the passengers. Therefore, the headline is correct as stated.

 

Bobby James McGruder

May 20, 2009

Oh God. These are the Right's arguments? No wonder they're irrelevant now.

 

Bob

May 20, 2009

This is part of Obama's plan to save Social Security. If you get killed in a small car you won't be around to collect it.

 

Mossy

May 20, 2009

Duh! Non-fuel-efficient cars can kill you too.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story