Washington Examiner  home delivery | classifieds | autos | jobs | real estate | home listings | advertise
   
Passport to the Podium
View today's E-Dition

Sunday, August 1, 2010 | Last Update 3:52 EDT
click for forecast
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classified Cars Homes Rentals Remodel
Nation World Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays Opinion Zone Capital Land Weather Mobile Site RSS Feeds Contact
Nation World Science Education Video Technology
Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York Chris Stirewalt
Capital Land DC Virginia Maryland Local Opinion Zone Crime Transportation People Education Real Estate
Editorials Beltway Confidential OpinionZone Nate Beeler Columnists Mark Tapscott Dave Freddoso Mark Hemingway
Your Money Real Estate Technology K-Street
Cheers & Jeers Redskins/NFL Wizards/NBA Caps/NHL Nationals/MLB United/MLS Colleges Golf
Yeas & Nays Art Movies Television Health Food Music Scoop Theater Wheels Video Events Calendar
Jobs Buy Stuff Post Free Ad Personals Events
Automotive News New Used Certified Pre-Owned
Real Estate News Rent a Home Buy a Home Home Makeover

Opinion
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

Good grief - now the trial lawyers want a White House lawsuit czar

Examiner Editorial
-
January 25, 2009

 

One thing the Obama White House doesn’t lack is czars. So far, there are or soon will be an energy czar, an economy czar, a health care czar and an urban affairs czar. There may yet be a White House car czar, and, if the class-action trial lawyers have their way – which they almost always do when the Democrats they bought and paid for are in power – there will soon be a lawsuit czar, too. The American Association for Justice (AAJ) nee American Trial Lawyers Association (ATLA) was careful in its statement last week not to call explicitly for a czar. Shorn of AAJ’s rhetorical smoke, however, it’s clear a czar is exactly what AAJ has in mind with its proposed White House office to “coordinate federalism issues” throughout the executive branch.

The immediate focus of AAJ’s White House lawsuit czar would be “pre-emption.” The class-action lawyers want to make sure Obama makes good on a campaign promise to reverse the recent trend among federal regulators to pre-empt – i.e. supersede - state jurisdiction on consumer safety regulation, particularly in the areas of transportation and prescription drugs. The class-action lawyers want to be able to file 50 separate class-action suits against an alleged corporate sinner instead of just one in federal court.

The White House lawsuit czar is needed, AAJ claims, to insure “the right of Americans to hold wrongdoers accountable through the civil justice system.” Translated, AAJ knows more class-action lawsuits mean more settlements mean more fees for the attorneys. The AAJ proposal couldn’t be more ill-timed. As the Institute for Legal Reform’s Lisa Rickard said “America cannot sue its way out of this recession. More lawsuits won't create more jobs, help consumers or rebuild America's infrastructure.”

President Obama will soon have to act on another issue on which his decision could mean another class-action lawsuit bonanza. The Senate last Thursday approved the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which the House passed in early January. If Obama signs Ledbetter, as he promised during the 2008 presidential campaign, the new law will reverse a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision by removing the statute of limitations on pay discrimination suits. Instead of having to file within the 180 days specified by the court, Ledbetter enables class-action trial lawyers to haul employers to court decades after an alleged harm took place. Obama displayed his independence by supporting the Class Action Fairness Act in 2005. Now he should veto Ledbetter and tell AAJ to go find their own czar.


Topics

AAJ , ATLA , Trial Lawyers , Class-action Plaintiffs Lawyers , Lawsuits , President Barack Obama ,

beltway confidential
Eight congressmen now calling for Rangel to give up his seat

The Hill: The tally of House Democrats calling on Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) to resign his seat in Congress stood at eight as members adjourned for the August recess late...

—Mark Hemingway

Growing ‘independent’ nature of electorate is helping GOP

The proportion of Republicans, Democrats, and independents that turnout to vote shape the outcome of every election.  Even small shifts in these percentages can dramatically...

—Gary Andres

It’s not just Rangel — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., to be tried on ethics charges

Here’s your Friday night news dump — move over Charlie Rangel: Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) has chosen to go through an ethics trial, like the one lined up for...

—Mark Hemingway

NYT: ‘No more disputing’ economic recovery has slowed down, jobs outlook ‘discouraging’

With the dismal GDP figures that came in today, The New York Times isn’t mincing words. The outlook for jobs and economic growth is bleak: There is no more disputing it:...

—Mark Hemingway

More Beltway Confidential posts...

Capital Land, the Examiner's local news blog




Today’s Featured Writers
Bill O'Reilly
What about the things Sherrod did wrong?
Diana West
Admitting Turkey to EU means Eurabia
Diane Dimond
Time to close the door on a bad idea -- early prison release
Steve Chapman
Traditional marriage advocates capitalize on criticism
Mona Charen
Washington Post finds waste -- in government!
Michael Barone
Voters want supersized government to crash diet
Meghan Cox Gurdon
To kids, Botticelli's Venus is just a buck-naked woman


Examiner Opinion Zone
How do bureaucracies work?

One respectable answer is that they don't. Many an op-ed has been written to elaborate the point, but this won't be one of them. Such answer is neither useful nor reassuring...

—Jason Kuznicki

Communist Monarchies

Outside of the Arabian Peninsula, where in the world do you think absolute monarchies still exist? A strong clue is given in this Daily Telegraph story about the fate of the...

—P.J. Gladnick

A different path to regime change in Iran

“The republic has no need of science or of chemistry.” With these words, a French tribunal confirmed its 1794 sentence of death on Antoine Lavoisier, the great...

—Neil Hrab

More Examiner Opinion Zone posts...

Most Popular Headlines
  1. Chris Matthews' daughter tackles the deficit
  2. WaPo buries Dem fundraiser’s fraud, highlights GOP fundraising scandal
  3. To historians, Obama pledged to ’speak less often’ in future
  4. It’s not just Rangel — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., to be tried on ethics charges
  5. Hapless SEC can now hide its secrets
  6. Obama unemployment news conference featured Va. woman convicted of drug fraud
  7. NYT: ‘No more disputing’ economic recovery has slowed down, jobs outlook ‘discouraging’
  8. Growing ‘independent’ nature of electorate is helping GOP
  9. Top GOP campaign donors charged with $550 million fraud
  10. Obama’s auto policy: All in the Democratic family





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Criminal Justice Degree Online

 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words. Comments that advocate violence, racism, or libel as well as comments written in ALL CAPS are not permitted.


blog comments powered by Disqus

RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Intern | Video | Maps | Mobile | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Rack Locations | Advertise