Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Health care by coercive government

Examiner Editorial
November 6, 2009

If the Founding Fathers knew what Speaker Pelosi was up to, they'd be rolling in their graves.

America's Founding Fathers established a government based on the consent of the governed. They never envisioned a government that ran the lives of its citizens with or without their consent. Suffice it to say they would turn in their graves if they read the 1,900-plus-page health care reform bill the House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on Saturday. (Proponents of the bill have promoted it for months using multiple fairy tales that are ably exposed on page 21 by The Examiner's David Freddoso and Mark Hemingway.)

That American citizens should be fined or even put in federal prison for refusing to purchase government-approved health insurance is as un-American as any idea we can imagine. But such a mandate is the very heart of the bill written behind closed doors by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her privileged pals. If their bill is approved by the House tomorrow, we will be a big step closer to the day when everybody gets their health care insurance through the government or from an approved insurer offering policies that meet meticulously detailed specifications contained in thousands of pages of federal regulations.

Welcome to America, land of the formerly free, and home of citizens covered by a nationalized health care system crafted by the same government that can't care for American Indians on their reservations or deliver swine flu shots on time.

It would be one thing if Democrats were simply trying to insure the uninsured, but their bill goes far beyond this modest goal. Democrats believe they must first tighten their regulatory grip on what's left of the private health care industry, then squeeze with all their bureaucratic might to force costs down by effectively rationing health care.

Besides rationing care, the bill adds expensive new mandates on people (compulsory insurance for all), as well as costly new regulatory burdens on insurance companies (thus increasing premiums) and on your employer (which will reduce your wages). The Democrats' bill also creates multiple new layers of federal bureaucracy to look over your doctor's shoulder.

This plan is doomed to fail, but in failing it will likely inflict severe collateral damage on the quality of your health coverage and your health care. As Medicare staggers toward bankruptcy, Democrats in Congress -- led by Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and, of course, President Obama -- want another massive, unsustainable new federal program to save the massive, unsustainable old federal program. When do we stop the vicious, self-defeating cycle of heaping government fiats upon government fiats to fix problems government creates?



beltway confidential

Republicans and business interests were already deeply suspect of Craig Becker, Obama's nominee to the National Labor Relations Board. Becker was formerly counsel to the AFL-CIO...

Just a few years after scandal nearly destroyed the Buckeye State's GOP, Rasmussen has the Ohio Republican candidates for governor and Senate leading their Democratic...

I've just been in touch with Sen. Christopher Bond, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Rep. Peter Hoekstra, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence...

The Audi ad mocking overzealous environmentalism "hits home," San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom tweeted during the Super Bowl. The locally conceived advertisement was enough to...






Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

publius

Nov 6, 2009

Wrong. The founding fathers created a government based on consent of the people's representatives in Congress. Go read Madison's notes on the Constitutional Convention readily available on the Internet. As to compulsory participation, it is no different from compulsory taxation or compulsory military service in times of the draft. No consent form is involved. If we choose not to require compulsary participation in health insurance we must agree to that the uninsureds will not be treated when sick or injured. It might not be a bad idea - letting them die off would strengthen the intellectual gene pool.

 

Dennis Kolb Sr.

Nov 6, 2009

The Nation's Capitol Has become a sanctuary for "Law Exempt Politicians"!!
Any other business or corporation would not be allowed,By Law,to do the things that go on inside the halls of congress????
Besides,they think Americans are too stuped to make Any choices on our own, except when they tell us how We should vote at election time..
PS;Pelosi should not limit haunting the halls of congress,but should do public service in haunting the homes of her supporters..Didn't we see her Oct.31st.??????

 

Ron

Nov 6, 2009

The collection of taxes and the provision of national security are inherently governmental functions and are specifically spelled out in the Constitution. There is no precedent nor is there any authority granted to the federal government to mandate the purchase of goods or services. The Congressional Budget Office stated, "“The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States...An individual mandate would have two features that, in combination, would make it unique. First, it would impose a duty on individuals as members of society. Second, it would require people to purchase a specific service that would be heavily regulated by the federal government.”

 

depaz

Nov 6, 2009

By the time they get done w/the compulsory mandates and the regulatory burdens on insurance companies and businesses, that pool of "the rich" will be shrinking drastically. Who are they gonna tax then?? Watch out middle class. . . . .

 

Chris

Nov 6, 2009

Do the democrats have enough prison space to put all the people who refuse to pay their fines? If enough people refused, it would put a crimp in their plans. I, for one, would be pleased to serve the time.

 

tucanofulano

Nov 6, 2009

Well, the Democrats always go for multiple objectives in every sneak attack against the American people. In this case 1 2) ABORTIONS for ILLEGAL ALIENS, 3) Increased CONTROL OVER actual AMERICANS, 4) higher TAXES, 5) PAYBACK to SPECIAL INTERESTS 6) an endless list of PORK

 

Diane

Nov 6, 2009

Is anyone else out there that sees this administration doing only what is wrecking our country? How long can we allow it to go on?

 

Sleepytime gal

Nov 6, 2009

Diane sounds like crazed Boehner and his cohorts at the Capitol yesterday.

tucanofulano - ..."2)ABORTIONS for ILLEGAL ALIENS". - Wouldn't that be dreamy. Like getting more anchor babies?

"PAYBACK to SPECIAL INTERESTS" Something that has never happened while the Reps were in power, right?

 

jcandme85

Nov 11, 2009

I REFUSE their healthcare program, and won't be any part of it. How many people can they arrest, when nobody wants it. What's the rush anyway? They have pushed and shoved and amended until they have shoved it donw our throats..LITERALLY. How many "we the people" of the USA have to object, before they can see WE don't want it! More Communism.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Slideshow: Washington area snow photos

Here are some of the best snow photos in the DC area from the Associated Press, the Examiner' s own Andrew Harnik and courtesy photos from Kathleen Dellinger: Full story

Politics

Rep. John Murtha dies at 77

A spokesman says Democratic Rep. John Murtha of... Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story