Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

How Republicans can win on Obamacare UPDATED!

Examiner Editorial
November 10, 2009

Rep. Tom Perriello, D-VA, voted for Obamacare but represents a district that voted for Republican John McCain in 2008.

 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's, D-Calif., narrow 220-215 win late Saturday for her version of Obamacare can be reversed if Republicans will play hardball. That means turning up the heat on the 16 pro-Pelosi Obamacare Democrats from moderate and conservative-leaning districts carried by John McCain in 2008. These 16 Democrats will have to vote again when a Senate-House conference report is presented for final consideration, assuming the Senate approves its own version of Obamacare. Republicans must go all out now in helping those 16 Democrats understand that their conference committee report vote will be their last chance to redeem themselves with their constituents, growing majorities of whom passionately oppose Obamacare.

There may only be a few weeks before an Obamacare conference report comes up, so the National Republican Congressional Committee, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, and the Republican National Committee had better get cracking. First, as The Examiner's Hugh Hewitt suggested yesterday, the NRCC should establish a campaign fund designated solely to fund opponents of the 16 pro-Pelosi Obamacare Democrats. As Hewitt wrote, "stapling Saturday's vote to these congressmen will not only give them reason to reverse their positions next time, it will also give the country an opportunity to vote with their wallets." The NRCC told The Examiner that Hewitt's idea is being "actively considered." Let the stapling begin now.

At the same time, the NRSC should establish a similar fund on the Senate side with the promise that all funds contributed to it will go to unseat red and purple states' senators who vote for cloture or otherwise enable Obamacare to pass the Senate. Finally, if Michael Steele wants to make the RNC a genuine player, he will guarantee a dollar-for-dollar match for every donation received by the special NRCC and NRSC funds.

Democrats who ignored the groundswell of opposition to Obamacare and voted for the Pelosi bill face big trouble, says David Keene, president of the American Conservative Union. "They're betting that by the time election rolls around, they'll get away with it," he told The Examiner. Pelosi "staked everything on getting a vote, and it barely got through even with that." Andy Roth of the Club for Growth agrees that the vote has made some Democrats especially good targets. "If there's a Democrat who says he's a conservative but votes with Nancy Pelosi, that'll make it easier to unseat them. Democrats who are vulnerable yet still voted for this have a target on their back." That message must be driven home over and over in coming weeks.

UPDATE: Here are the 16 Democrats.

The number to the right of the representative's name is the percentage of vote received in his district by Republican presidential candidate John McCain in the 2008 election:

WV-01 Mollohan 57
WV-03 Rahall 56
AR-02 Snyder 54
AZ-01 Kirkpatrick 54
PA-10 Carney 54
ND-AL Pomeroy 53
SC-05 Spratt 53
AZ-05 Mitchell 52
AZ-08 Giffords 52
OH-18 Space 52
IN-08 Ellsworth 51
VA-05 Perriello 51
CO-03 Salazar 50
IN-09 Hill 50
OH-06 Wilson 50
PA-12 Murtha 50

UPDATE II:  DNC targets 32 GOPers from districts carried by Obama in 08

Congress Daily reports the Democratic National Committee has already moved to target 32 House Republicans who voted against the Pelosi-Obamacare bill and who represent districts carried by the president in 2008:

 

 

 



beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Dennis Kolb Sr.

Nov 10, 2009

It is a sad day in America when the only leverage over a vote comes down to someones re-election chances..
The Founding Fathers never had this kind of representation in mind!!

 

publius@boo.net

Nov 10, 2009

The founding fathers considered the business of politics as essentially corrupt and debated how to deal with the ambition, greed and self interest of politicians. They considered term limits, rotation systems, restrictions of the popular suffrage to substantial property owners, a Senate dedicated to protecting the aristocracy and to limit House which would be more populist. Hamilton recommended the British system in which the monarch had every reason to always do the right thing since "he had a fee simple on all of England" and everything to gain by doing the right thing and nothing to lose. In the end their new system relied on the voters to turn bad representatives out of office. It does not happen often enough. Too bad they dropped the term limits idea. They were afraid term limits would turn good men out of office, perhaps to be replaced with bad ones.

 

COMMENTMAN

Nov 10, 2009

This makes to much sense. Republicans will never do it.

 

Retired CPO

Nov 10, 2009

As we saw in New York 23, the Republican leadership is more interested in picking the candidates than letting the primary system select them. When the Central party picks a winner and starts funding them before the primary they put the other candidates at a disadvantage. All the good wished in the world will not substitute for a conservative candidate who will articulate the position he/she holds without regard to polls.
until the National party learns to stop picking the candidates for the local areas, we will always have weak, "moderate" leftist candidates and a minority role in government.

 

Mark

Nov 10, 2009

The NRCC, the RNC and all the other insiders are stuck in the politics of the past. They support liberal Republicans...and many hope they will learn from their mistakes and do the right thing. I don't have a lot of hope that they will.

 

C Brown

Nov 10, 2009

AZ-05 Mitchell 52
AZ-08 Giffords 52
Both seats were won from Republicans in 2006(Kolbe and Hayworth) and successfully defended in 2008.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story