Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

It's Time to Resign, Charlie

Examiner Editorial
-
December 4, 2008

Like the Queen who Alice tangled with in Wonderland, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi apparently isn’t interested in weighing the evidence before deciding the verdict on whether Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-NY, should continue as House Ways and Means Committee chairman. Rangel claims Pelosi told him earlier this week that “I am her chairman of the Ways and Means Committee as long as I want to be.” No word now on the status of the official investigation of Rangel announced Sept. 24 by the House Ethics Committee. Pelosi may have committed an ethical no-no by saying anything definitive about Rangel’s status prior to the ethics panel’s official report. She says ethics committee staff have assured her that report will be released by Jan. 3, 2009. Texas Republican John Carter has demanded that Pelosi “address immediately the very real questions this incident raises about whether your office has sought to improperly influence the conduct, scope, timing or any other aspect of an ongoing House ethics investigation.”

Meanwhile, the allegations of improprieties by Rangel continue to mount, with the latest being that the New York congressman helped preserve a tax break for Nabors Industries, an oil company, shortly after Eugene Isenberg, Nabors’ CEO, gave $1 million to the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Affairs. Rangel said - presumably with a straight face - that the timing of his assistance was “coincidental.” Whether coincidental or not, we agree with Bob Edgar of Common Cause, who said in a letter to the ethics panel that Rangel’s actions “could undermine the credibility of Congress’ efforts to deal with our deep economic problems.” But Rangel’s lapses affect matters that go far beyond Congress’ ability to deal with the current economic crisis.

Rangel has reportedly sent solicitations for contributions to the Rangel Center to multiple parties, some with issues being decided by the Ways and Means committee. Those solicitations were on official committee stationary. He has also been the focus of media reports that he failed to pay taxes or report income on a property in the Dominican Republic, that he took improper tax deductions, and that four apartments he owns in a New York building receive public subsidies. Since the Ways and Means Committee routinely deals with the most critical and sensitive issues on taxes and who does or doesn’t pay them, it is ludicrous to think Rangel can continue credibly as chairman. Any corporation is now suspect whose executives contributed to Rangel’s campaigns or his favored causes and that has received favorable treatment from the committee during Rangel’s chairmanship. Rangel should resign the chairmanship promptly and avoid adding to the public’s record-low approval ratings of Congress.



beltway confidential

Lincoln a 'Yes' Senate Democrats will be able to begin debate on an $849 billion health care reform bill now that Sen. Blanche Lincoln has committed to voting to move the...

In his weekly radio and YouTube address, President Obama this week makes the case for his recent trip to Asia, saying one of the main reasons for going was helping the U.S....

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

Where is your stimulus money going? In Baker City, Ore., the Bureau of Land Management is putting $256,000 of it toward "rattlesnake stewardship." It's the latest...


Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Nana

Dec 5, 2008

When Trent Lott made a facetious comment to cheer an old man at his birthday party, The attacks were unrelenting, ending with Lott's resignation. We are now looking at people (Rangle, Jefferson, Frank, Dodd, to name a few) who should be wearing orange jumpsuits. Not only they will not resign their chairmanships, the speaker guarantees they won't have to. The worst of all of this is that the people who elect them see nothing wrong, either. They just keep sending them back, term after term. Until these crooks acknowledge and pay for their crimes, nothing good will ever be accomplished. By the by, someone should inform Ms Pelosi that speaker is not a synonym for queen.

 

mike

Dec 6, 2008

As if there are so many examples that the hardworking and honest republican party have put in front of us as great examples of ethical giants. What a joke and a relic of a party.

 

Bonemaker

Dec 6, 2008

The second comment by MIKE is interesting to me. It seems to imply that it is ok for Rangel and or Jefferson to engage in unethical or even illegal activities. It os ok because some republican have done it in the past. Even though those people were hounded out of office and rightfully so if they were guilty. But since it is a Democrat it is ok. Makes no sense. Actually it sounds hypocritical and stupid. But MIke most likely will not see this as he has used the typical response that all the good KOOLAID drinkers use. Dont look at members of his own party and find fault oh no...justify it by insulting the other party. NOT with reason and with a cuase to fix the problem just insults, and bile.

 

Dorinda

Dec 7, 2008

ISN'T IT TIME A VERY LARGE MARCH ON WASHINGTON IS PLANNED AND EXECUTED????? WHAT THE HELL ARE WE WAITING FOR??? A MARCH TO DEMAND RESIGNATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS. CAN ANYONE GET THIS THING OFF THE GROUND?? I'LL BE OUTSIDE WARMING UP MY CAR AND POLISHING MY SHOVEL.

 

Wee Willie

Dec 7, 2008

Rangel is a skunk of the first order. He stinks up our entire country with his immoral behavior, and the Liberal Democrats LOVE him. Birds of a feather feed together.....

 

Richard L. Collignon, Jr.

Dec 8, 2008

The democrats, or "progressives," which many of the new-left use to refer to themselves, don't see the world in terms of "good and evil." All is relative, and "who are we to judge?" That is, unless you're a white, middle aged, Christian! If you are, then you are considered one bad and ignorant person! So, they cannot nor have not investigated any of the multitudinous and egregious felonies committed during recent history by many of their own, corrupt members. They are such outright scum-bags, that it makes me physically ill! And don't hold one's breath for any meaningful investigations...

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Suspended NASCAR Sprint Cup driver Jeremy Mayfield chats with attendees during a public auction Friday, Nov. 20, 2009, at his Catawba, N.C. property. As NASCAR prepares to crown a champion in its fina...

Long way from the track, suspended Mayfield holds large auction to help pay for court fight

Jeremy Mayfield sat in the back of his large barn Friday morning about 800 miles from where NASCAR's season-ending weekend was kicking off. Several hundred people surrounded him, listening intently as a fast-speaking auctioneer sold dozens of items. Full story

Economy

Venezuela seeks to annul pharmaceutical patents for antibiotic produced by Bayer HealthCare

Venezuela's trade minister says the government plans to annul the pharmaceutical patents for an antibiotic produced by Bayer HealthCare. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story