Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Obama's automotive policies subsidize failure

Examiner Editorial
-
June 3, 2009

General Motors, which only a few short months ago President Obama considered too big to fail,  has failed anyway. It took $20 billion in taxpayer money down with it before finally being forced into the second largest industrial bankruptcy on record. And there will be at least another $30 billion in government aid to come. If this is the way the company will be managed from now on, politically correct Edsels will soon be rolling off Obama Motor’s newly reorganized assembly lines.

The White House’s initial insistence that GM not be allowed to go bankrupt, followed by its unprecedented takeover of the Detroit automaker, sends confusing and contradictory signals. GM’s bailout was supposed to protect jobs, but 120,000 factory and dealership positions will be eliminated under the bankruptcy. Obama insisted he had “no interest” in running the struggling automaker, but under the terms his auto industry task force imposed on GM, the federal government now has a 60 percent stake. Repeated White House declarations to the contrary notwithstanding, it’s been clear who was in charge since the day Obama fired former GM CEO Rick Wagoner.

The market has already figured out that union-friendly federal bureaucrats won’t rein-in the excessive labor costs that crippled GM for decades. GM stock is down to 75 cents a share from $90 less than a decade ago, and the firm once known as the world’s largest corporation has been removed from the 30 blue-chip stocks used in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Stockholders have been wiped out, with bondholders faring only slightly better after being forced to write off $27 billion.

Only Washington politicos and United Auto Workers (UAW) union officials in Detroit think new investors are going to step up to help Obama Motors, especially given that the company’s new Chevrolet Volt electric vehicle will cost about $15,000 more than the popular Toyota Prius. A major reason the Volt will cost so much more is the government-mandated labor agreement that leaves the UAW’s excessively generous compensation package mostly in place. That and a $13 billion gap in GM’s underfunded pension fund will keep the company’s head under water for years to come.

Allowing GM – and Chrysler - to go bankrupt back in December before billions of tax dollars were thrown at the two firms as they were effectively nationalized would have saved taxpayers billions. It also would have sent a much more positive message than the current one coming from Washington: “We Subsidize Failure.”



beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

Where is your stimulus money going? In Baker City, Ore., the Bureau of Land Management is putting $256,000 of it toward "rattlesnake stewardship." It's the latest...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...


Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Margaret

Jun 3, 2009

I think EVERYONE is missing the real point: the UAW will funnel even more money into the President's campaign slush fund until the United States become a one-party nation. Obama has deliberately committed the entire nation to trillions in debt, nationalized the banking system, taken over a substantial portion of the manufacturing sector and handed it over to unions who will use revenue to keep the Democrat party in control of Legislatures and Congress, and he's going to attempt to silence dissent and establish an activist Supreme Court. Gone are the checks and balances. Gone are our freedoms. Gone is the entrepreneurial spirit and the capitalist system. When the population is defacto disarmed by restrictions on purchases of ammunition, the re-education camps and purges will begin.

 

M Santini

Jun 6, 2009

Subsidized failure?? Oh you mean like Bush subsidized the failure of the whole financial system in the US as he sat back and watched and let the whole system run into the ditch for the last 8 years? Get over it you republican lackeys. This who republican rag you call a paper offers no news, its just negative critical political commentary with no viable solutions. Pretty much all the republican party has had to offer and thats why it is also in the ditch. Obama won the presidency so get over it clowns! You all are so pathetic its now just funny to read your commentary. Almost as funny as reading the Onion satire newspaper on the Metro.

 

JohnsSideKick

Jun 8, 2009

Obama has NO idea about Labor and Physically Working, How can he run a car company. The most progressive automobile people in the world FAILED at GM and this Brainless idiot thinks he can be re-elected by trying to save a busted company, Get a life Obama!

 

KB

Jun 11, 2009

Hey M,

I think you really need to take a look at which president embraced the idea of home ownership etc. no matter the income. you also need to take a look at who barney frank was in bed with, and the company that his boy toy worked for.

can you really be that ignorant?

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Economy

Investors seeking Stanford assets urge Antiguan court to remove British firm as liquidator

A group of investors is urging an Antiguan court to remove a British accounting firm appointed to collect assets of a Caribbean offshore bank at the center of an alleged Ponzi scheme by Texas financier R. Allen Stanford. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story