Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Obama's 'Card Check' is anti-democratic

Examiner Editorial
-
October 9, 2008

Right after Tuesday night’s presidential debate ended, a new ad was aired featuring 1972 Democratic standard bearer George McGovern, who, until Barack Obama came along, was easily the most liberal presidential nominee ever. McGovern was a reliable Big Labor ally throughout his Senate career, but not now. In the TV ad, he blasted Obama’s “Card Check” proposal to abolish secret ballots in union representation elections in the workplace. Secret ballots must be preserved, he said, “because democracy is something that should never be sacrificed.”

Card check – aka the “Employee Free Choice Act” - would require all employees to pay union dues as soon as 50 percent of employees sign a petition (a “card”) demanding a union. Without secret ballots, everybody will know who didn’t sign the petition, which will likely subject them to union retaliation and intimidation. As McGovern wrote in a recent column in The Wall Street Journal, “There are many documented cases where workers have been pressured, harassed, tricked and intimidated into signing cards that have led to mandatory payment of dues.”

Yet union bosses hold so much sway within Obama’s party that every Democrat in the U.S. Senate voted for the card check bill in 2007. It was defeated only by a Republican filibuster. The measure passed overwhelmingly in the House. Virginia’s U.S. Rep. James Moran and Maryland’s U.S. Rep. Chris Van Hollen separately met recently with The Washington Examiner editorial board, and offered sheepish explanations of their votes for card check. “I’ll vote with my party,” Moran said. “There are only so many things I can take on. As a Democrat, you choose your battles. My battle with organized labor is on trade.”  Van Hollen offered little better. “Workers who were trying to organize were not getting a fair shake,” he said. “But I want to stress that there is an opportunity here after this election to look at this whole situation… and figure out the best way forward.” Pressed to explain why card check is the answer, Van Hollen demurred.

Obama isn’t demurring. He clearly doesn’t care about protecting workers from intimidation by union goons because he recently vowed that Democrats "will pass the Employee Free Choice Act. It's not a matter of if – it’s a matter of when.” When a right as essential to democracy as the secret ballot is at stake, Democrats should recall what JFK said – “sometimes the party asks too much” – and follow McGovern’s courageous example instead of Obama’s slavish devotion to Big Labor’s agenda.



beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

andrew padula

Oct 11, 2008

This policy goes against every democratic, constitutional, and moral principal that exists. The American political system,heritage,and our common values are all designed to protect our individual liberties and to give each man an equal voice. The opportunity for abuse and intimidation that this policy will provide is staggering. Winning without honor, and power without the consent of the governed is not the way we do things in a free society. The absence of moral fortitude on Mr. VanHollens' part speaks volumes about his lack of character. This thirst for power at any cost is dangerous. This highlights more than ever how voters need to carefully examine candidates and not just vote out of party loyalty.

 

Bud Greene

Oct 23, 2008

Card Check is worse than undemocratic, it is a typical bully process to promote socialism

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story