Washington Examiner  home delivery | classifieds | autos | jobs | real estate | home listings | advertise
   
Dining stimulus plan
Welcome,   My Account |  Log out
Welcome, Guest  Sign In |  Register
Sunday, March 21, 2010 | Last Update 4:19 EDT
View today's E-Dition

click for forecast
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classifieds Jobs Autos Home Listings
Nation World Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays Opinion Zone Weather Mobile Site RSS Feeds Contact
Nation World Science Education RSS Feeds
Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York Chris Stirewalt
Local Front DC Virginia Maryland Blogs Crime Transportation People Education Real Estate Events Calendar
Editorials Beltway Confidential OpinionZone Nate Beeler Columnists Mark Tapscott Dave Freddoso Mark Hemingway
Your Money Real Estate Technology K-Street
Blogs Redskins/NFL Wizards/NBA Caps/NHL Nationals/MLB United/MLS Colleges Golf
Yeas & Nays Movies Television Music Health Events Calendar

Opinion
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

On energy, U.S. should not emulate Spain

Examiner Editorial
September 27, 2009


In his campaign to increase renewable energy use in the United States by government fiat, President Obama often points to Spain as a "green jobs success story." Here's the part of the story Obama doesn't mention: If the United States follows Spain's decade-long lead, we'll need massive government subsidies to keep renewable energy companies afloat. Worse yet, each new "green" job will come at the expense of at least two old jobs in the private sector, according to a blockbuster study led by Gabriel Calzada, economics professor at King Juan Carlos University in Madrid.

When Calzada and his team published the study, they were publicly denounced as unpatriotic for questioning their country's "solar revolution." But the Spanish government itself quietly admitted on April 20 that the growing deficit created by solar subsidies jeopardized the financial stability of Spain's entire power industry. When the government was forced to reduce the subsidies by 30 percent and put a cap on new solar plant construction, "the whole sector collapsed," Calzada said in an editorial board meeting with The Examiner. Without ever-increasing subsidies, he explained, Spain's renewable energy industry simply is not economically feasible.

The Calzada study drew unusual criticism from the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory, which objected to the methodology of the Spanish researchers. But Robert Murphy, research economist at the Institute for Energy Research, called NREL's objections "contradictory and often downright silly," pointing out that two different techniques used by Calzada's team yielded identical results. "Where does NREL think the government's money comes from, the Tooth Fairy?" Murphy asked.

Even after receiving the equivalent of $43 billion in subsidies, solar energy still accounts for less than 1 percent of Spain's total electric output. But now residential electric bills are going up, and energy-intensive industries have begun moving their plants to Malaysia and Brazil to escape rising electricity costs and an increasingly unreliable power supply. Spain has the worst-performing economy in the European Union and, despite its massive support of renewable energy, remains the biggest violator of the Kyoto Protocol. Unemployment -- including thousands of former "green" workers -- hit 18.5 percent in July and is expected to be even higher next year.

This is the nation Obama wants the United States to emulate?

Spain's failed experiment with renewable energy is a cautionary tale for American politicians who prefer to ignore the real-world costs of "green energy" subsidies. As millions of unemployed Spaniards can attest, diverting billions of tax dollars to alternative energy production methods that the market has already dismissed as inefficient is not the way to economic recovery or energy independence.


Topics

Washington Examiner

beltway confidential
Pro-life Democrat Stupak agrees to vote for health care bill

Rep. Bart Stupak and his gang of pro-life Democrats have signed onto a deal with the White House over abortion funding language in the bill. Stupak will announce his intention...

—Susan Ferrechio

Could Democrats vote "present?"

Some Republicans are suggesting that in light of the fact that the administration's Medicare and Medicaid actuary was not able to estimate the cost and impact of the health...

—Chris Stirewalt

Two Tennessee Democrats announce "no" votes

Two southern Democrats, Rep. Lincoln Davis and Rep. John Tanner, both of Tennessee, are voting against the health-care bill. I talked to Davis this afternoon about his decision....

—Susan Ferrechio

Stupak is still a firm "no"

Despite reports on MSNBC that pro-life Democrat Bart Stupak, D-Mich., will vote for the bill, he remains a "no" vote. I just talked to Stupak in the basement of the Capitol as...

—Susan Ferrechio

More Beltway Confidential posts...





Featured Writers
Bill O'Reilly
Paging Doctor Kildare
Diana West
U.S. confusion fogs relationship with Israel
Diane Dimond
Time to close the door on a bad idea -- early prison release
Steve Chapman
Time to change the faces on our dollars
Mona Charen
This is a non-arrogant foreign policy?
Michael Barone
$29 billion more deception in the health care legislation
Most Popular Headlines
  1. Rules Committee meeting descends into chaos
  2. Tea Party protesters refused entry into congressional buildings
  3. Stupak is still a firm "no"
  4. Sen. Hatch, R-Utah, says Dems are "nuts" to think tomorrow's vote ends health care debate
  5. $29 billion more deception in the health care legislation
  6. Health plan means bigger deficits and higher taxes
  7. As Dems struggle, GOP candidates line up to run
  8. David Limbaugh: Thank you, Bret Baier
  9. 'Deem and pass' dead; Now it's the 'Supermax' rule with few amendments, little debate
  10. Dems waste time in House as vote search goes on





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words. Warning: If you comment, the Disqus platform default is set to email you when other reply to it. If you do not want to receive these replies to your comment, please uncheck the box.


blog comments powered by Disqus


Local

Deadly accidents involving iPods alarm officials

At least three people in the Washington region have died in accidents in the last year, while wearing headphones. Full story

Sports

NCAA Tournament: Games to watch, March 19, 2010

No. 5 Temple vs. No. 12 Cornell Where »... Full story

Scoop

Scoop: Bullock’s marriage called a total sham

More revelations are emerging about the... Full story

Internships | Maps | RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Mobile | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Rack Locations | Advertise