Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Reid rushes to pass $1,000,000,000,000 stimulus

Examiner Editorial
-
February 5, 2009

There was more than a trace of desperation in Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s decision to hurry up voting on the Senate’s $900 billion economic stimulus package. Chalk that up to the growing realization beyond the Beltway that the Washington politicians are pulling another fast one – telling taxpayers economic catastrophe is right around the corner if Congress doesn’t quickly approve the largest single federal spending bill in American history. Officially, the Senate version would spend $900 billion, but the actual total is in excess of $1 trillion – that is, $1,000,000,000,000 – when interest costs are included. More than 300 amendments have been offered, but only 20 were debated. No hearings were held, no expert testimony heard. Reid is like the white rabbit, pitifully moaning, “I’m late, I’m late,” as public opposition grows.

The pensive Reid is not alone. Just as President George W. Bush predicted economic collapse if Congress failed to approve the $700 billion Wall Street bailout last fall, President Barack Obama now warns that failure to pass the bill “will turn a crisis into a catastrophe,” with a deep recession stretching for years into the future. But plummeting public support suggests that people are beginning to see such “sky is falling” rhetoric for what it is – cover for an explosion of pork barrel spending, monumental expenditures to expand government’s reach into daily American life, and a flood of new bureaucracies. This is not change, this is a con job on behalf of fattening up Leviathan. Unfortunately, Reid will probably get his way, thanks in part to liberal Republicans. Maine’s Susan Collins said yesterday she will vote for the stimulus bill, and Reid claimed to have another GOP vote in his pocket.

As usual, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-OK, put it best during an impassioned Senate floor speech Tuesday evening, saying: “When the American people learn what this bill contains they will reject it. This bill is about spending money we don’t have on things we don’t need. We got into this mess by spending and investing money that didn’t exist. We won’t get out of this mess by doing more of the same.” In a mere two weeks, public approval for the stimulus has dropped from 45 percent to 37 percent, according to the latest Rasmussen survey. Support is even dropping among Democrats, from 72 percent a week ago to 64 percent this week. And at least half of those surveyed say the final result of the economic stimulus spending will be to make things worse.



beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...

Clearly it's just a joke, but a bad joke. Washington Post writer Monica Hesse writes of the irresistible nature of the Twilight book series about vampires written primarily for...


Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

jack

Feb 6, 2009

It seems that the "change" that the new administration has promised is actually more of the same corrupt spending habits of the professional politicians with more zeros at the end. You can believe it is just hope over experience to think that this "stimulus" is anything but pork as usual.

 

Bush Rushed US into $3 Trillion War

Feb 6, 2009

Why don't we just find another $3 trillion war? That would be a better use of money than rebuilding the U.S.

 

House of Lords

Feb 6, 2009

What did you expect foll me once shame on you , fool me twice, shame on me. Bush & Paulson beat them to the punch. Let them all choke. Notice they said to Wall St no extravagant parties? Then they go to Kingsmill VA?

 

Jack

Feb 6, 2009

The $3 trillion dollar war is actually short a zero or two. It was started when Carter and Brzezinski decided to start the war in Afghanistan in 1979 by funding the jihadists. Just do a google search for "stirred up muslims" and Brzezinski to find out the truth about how they decided to use Afghans as cannon fodder to liberate Ziggy's Poland and open the ultimate pandora's box of death and destruction that meant millions of Afghans were maimed or murdered by the end of Carter's presidency. Bush's liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq was a bargain compared to the death and destruction that Carter wrought at ten times the price with nothing to show except his peace prize from the anti-semites on the Nobel committee.

 

Don't Rewrite History if You Don't Know Jack

Feb 6, 2009

Jack, you're right. Maybe we only wasted one trillion (so far) destroying then rebuilding Iraq. That makes it all better. Pinning the war on Iraq on Jimmy Carter is just idiotic. Even the morons in the Bush White House wouldn't attempt a leap of logic that dumb.

 

Jack

Feb 6, 2009

Having quit the CIA in 1979, along with a couple of other people who thought that starting a holy war was the way to getting us into the quagmire we are in is history that I do know. you might educate yourself about the truth before throwing around the usual words that liberals use instead of facts. Carter funded the Islamists, and the Islamists he funded are the beginiing of today's terrorists in Afghanistan, the training ground of the 9/11 murderers. Iraq seems to be a bigger success than Jimmy's war in Afghanistan, but history will tell. http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Graphic surveys NFL players concerning concussions

NFL union pans commissioner's call for players to report on teammates' possible concussions

The NFL Players Association opposes commissioner Roger Goodell's call for players to tell their teams' medical staffs if they think a teammate shows symptoms of a concussion, saying that is not an adequate solution. Full story

Economy

NC state treasurer issues gift ban for employees, limits on soliciting for charity

State Treasurer Janet Cowell unveiled new rules Friday banning employees from taking gifts from companies that do substantial business with the agency and setting a limit on charitable solicitations. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story