Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Tell us about your dirty lawyer money, Mr. Clinton

By: EXAMINER EDITORIAL HOT ZONE
-
January 14, 2009

Buried in the lengthy list of donors to the Clinton Foundation is a contribution of between $100,001 and $250,000 from William Lerach. Lerach is serving a federal prison term after his conviction, along with three fellow former senior partners of the disgraced Milberg Weiss class-action trial lawyers firm, for paying an estimated $11.7 million in bribes to plaintiffs in at least 150 cases going back to 1981. The firm received $250 million or more in tainted legal fees from the cases.

Lerach and Clinton are long-time political allies. But when The Washington Examiner asked if the former president would return Lerach’s dirty money, Clinton Foundation spokesman Mark McKenna refused to say. McKenna also refused to provide the specific amount and date of Lerach’s donation. And he declined to say what circumstances would result in a contribution being returned.

That such faux transparency is characteristic of the former president and incoming Secretary of State is seen in Hillary Clinton’s claim during her Senate confirmation hearing yesterday that State Department ethics lawyers found “no inherent conflict of interest” between her job and Clinton Foundation donors. Well, of course there is no inherent conflict, but what about specific conflicts, Mr. and Mrs. Clinton?


  



beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

Where is your stimulus money going? In Baker City, Ore., the Bureau of Land Management is putting $256,000 of it toward "rattlesnake stewardship." It's the latest...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...


Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

EdSwezey

Jan 15, 2009

I fail to see what's wrong with the Clinton Foundation accepting Lerach money, and I further fail to see how that is going to affect US foreign policy under HRC. You are complaining because you see Lerach as a bad guy, which he may very well be; but his contributing to the Clinton Foundation makes him a lot less bad in my view. The Foreign Relations Committee's general view is that the activities of the Foundation in no way interfere with US policy around the world, but that money from foreign contributors may be perceived as an attempt to buy influence with the Secretary of State. This is only a matter of perception in the public's mind, and concerns only foreign contributors. No one is concerned with domestic contributors like Lerach.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Economy

Closed communist-era factories reap windfall profit for Ukraine but problem for climate deal

Vladimir Gapor is a plumber by trade, but now he's a scavenger, prying bits of scrap steel from the ruins of his old factory and selling them for a pittance. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story