Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

When America becomes Obamaland

By: Mark Tapscott
Editorial Page Editor
March 19, 2009

There is one certainty about the shape of things to come if President Barack Obama wins approval of his extraordinarily ambitious proposals to remake America: We won’t recognize our country when he’s finished.

Barack Obama, losing his magic?
Perhaps the most prominent feature of Obamaland will be long lines, starting with the unemployment offices, thanks to coercive new powers to force unions on unwilling workplaces, and the skyrocketing prices for gas and electricity that his anti-global warming energy program will produce.

On the labor front, Andy Stern, head of the Service Employees International Union, optimistically predicts labor will gain “1.5 million members a year, not just for five years but for 10 to 15 straight years,” with many of the gains coming in the 22 right-to-work states located mainly in the South and Southwest.

Stern’s optimism is based on his confidence that the Democratic Congress will pass the horribly misnamed Employee Free Choice Act, aka card check, that abolishes secret ballots in workplace representation elections. Obama has repeatedly promised to sign the bill into law. But those new union members will cost millions of jobs for others, according to multiple data-driven studies. Anne Layne-Farrar, an economist with the nonpartisan LLEG Consulting, projects that unionizing 1.5 million jobs via card check in its first year would result in 600,000 lost jobs the next. That’s like the entire city of Boston becoming unemployed.

And it would get worse in every succeeding year because for every 3 percent gain in union membership, there would be a 1 percent drop in employment nationwide, according to Layne-Farrar.

Millions more people will be forced into unemployment lines by Obama’s embrace of former Vice President Al Gore’s strident predictions of imminent ecological disaster caused by global warming, purportedly caused by man’s excessive burning of carbon-based fossil fuels, chiefly oil.

Gore failed during the Clinton years to gain passage of a carbon tax, but Obama’s cap-and-trade program amounts to the same thing. Obama’s plan aims to reduce carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2030.

In the meantime, companies that exceeded the annual emissions reduction goals would be able to sell “carbon credits” to companies that fail to reach the goals, with the government collecting revenue on each transaction. Estimates of how much revenue will be raised range from $645 billion to as much as $1.8 trillion. The problem is that every penny of cap-and-trade revenues paid by corporations would be passed on to consumers, making the program effectively a back-door tax increase of massive proportion.

That tax increase will cost as many as four million more jobs, according to the American Council on Capital Formation.

Finally, there is Obama’s vision of a nationalized health care system. A Federal Health Board like that envisioned by former Sen. Tom Daschle, Obama’s first choice as secretary of health and human services until unpaid taxes derailed his nomination, would become America’s equivalent to Britain’s National Health Service.

Among much else, Obama’s FHB would ration health care treatment based on Competitive Effectiveness Research that ranks treatments for specific conditions according to a complex array of factors like cost, cure rates, patient age, and drug prescriptions.

As Sally Pipes of the Pacific Research Institute notes in her “Top 10 Myths of American Health Care,” long waiting lines for doctor visits, medical tests, and surgeries are commonplace in Britain and Canada, which have similar nationalized health care systems.

As Sen. Jim DeMint noted Monday in The Examiner, Claire Everett, a 23-year-old British wife and mother of two small children, died last September of lung and lymph node cancer. She died because under Britain’s version of the CER standards, women under 25 were denied the screening tests that would have caught Everett’s cancer early enough to be treated and saved her life.

Good luck to Kathleen Sebelius, Obama’s second choice to head HHS, when she tries to explain to millions of potential Claire Everetts in America why their treatment is being prescribed not by a doctor, but rather by research averages.
mtapscott@dcexaminer.com



beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

Where is your stimulus money going? In Baker City, Ore., the Bureau of Land Management is putting $256,000 of it toward "rattlesnake stewardship." It's the latest...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...


Most Popular Headlines





To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Health Dare

Mar 19, 2009

Health Care? or Health dare? get your words straight.... Socialized medicine works for the rich. hey travel to the USA and pay for it.

 

darter22

Mar 19, 2009

Was this ghost written by Rush Limbaugh?

 

Patriot1776

Mar 19, 2009

Was it un-American to bash bush??? Of course it was OK, because it was not in line with your personal views of politics. But when a president who holds the same belief systems you are endeared to he should be treated with respect. I say to you, no man is perfect but if he is doing the country a disservice via policy and an unattainable agenda, wouldn’t it behoove the press to investigate and question such dubious actions???

 

fiveyear plan

Mar 19, 2009

obama's policies will have stark-crude-results- to even mention them may upset those sleepheads who need teleprompted speak to feel good ... keep those comments coming! good article.

 

Mar 19, 2009

Patriot1776: "Greg, Was it un-American to bash bush??? ********************* Oh I see, tic for tact. You did it so why can't I? During the lead up to the invasion of Iraq, President Bush used the patriotic angle so no responsible journalist question him. If you got to close, you were unpatriotic. Thats why I used that term.

 

Brad

Mar 19, 2009

Greg - I spent 8 years hearing my President belittled and called names by the left, and It continues to this day. So now that it is the President that left wanted, suddenly this is un-American. What a double standard those on the left have. Apparently they must resort to name calling because they have no logical arguments with which they can support their ideas.

 

Steve

Mar 19, 2009

So far, none of the critical comments about the editorial present contrary arguments. Words without substance: Too typical these days from the Obama True Believers.

 

Debra

Mar 19, 2009

I approve of this article. Obama supporters will realize too late what he is doing to the US.

 

boozy

Mar 19, 2009

God I love the Libs...they all must have studied the same manuscript, because they all say the same thing...golly, libs..how does it really feel to have a brain made of Jello...must be a lot of fun making is slosh while listening to your messiah spill his anti american lies to his following...oh, by the way, the "O" is going to release a boat load of the terrorists from Gitmo into the USA..Maybe you guys can get together a lottery to win the chance to live next door to one of these killers....Good Luck...remember, if you don't play, you can't win...

 

Mark Tapscott

Mar 19, 2009

To darter22: Does George Soros or ACORN pay you by the hour or the number troll-posts you do?

 

JR

Mar 19, 2009

With all the talk about changing/reforming our health care system I have yet to hear a single Congressman/woman address the fact that this "reform" would only apply to us serfs and not to our lawmakers. They would remain covered under their current private insurance, with no changes or reform, while the rest of us would be covered under the "reformed" coverage. It would seem logical, if these ideas are of such necessity, why wouldn't the new provisions apply to all americans--including our lawmakers?

 

Howard or Andy

Mar 20, 2009

Andy Stern and his union pay for all these 3rd world country refugees in waiting to attend seminars in DC. He is very active in getting Burmese refugees riled up for the big day. Again this is through this quasi-Soros Open Society gizmo. Look out America many of the membership will be illegals and newly minted somewhat legals, with a bone to pick for trying to have them thrown out as illegals, Stern is a puppet of the democratic wing who wants all illegals

 

owlgore

Mar 20, 2009

I want to thank the liberal media for assisting in getting this guy elected. I don't know how you sleep at night. Anyway, good article Mark.

 

walter66

Mar 21, 2009

from Mark's story....."Stern’s optimism is based on his confidence that the Democratic Congress will pass the horribly misnamed Employee Free Choice Act, aka card check, that abolishes secret ballots in workplace representation elections." Mark, did you miss the memo from the WSJ...."The bill doesn't remove the secret-ballot option from the National Labor Relations Act but in practice makes it a dead letter." "but in practice makes it a dead letter issue" Employees will still have the option of a secrect ballot. It will NOT be the bill that makes this a dead letter issue but rather the employees who will now have a choice. What, you think working men and women are so stupid that they shouldn't be allowed a choice?

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

FAI Chief Executive John Delaney speaks during a press conference at the Football Association of Ireland  headquarters in Abbottstown, Dublin  Thursday Nov. 19, 2009. Ireland failed to qualify  for th...

Ireland gives up hope of getting World Cup replay with France over Thierry Henry's hand ball

Ireland has given up hope of a World Cup playoff replay against France because of Thierry Henry's hand ball. Full story

Politics

Democrats have 60 votes; Lincoln says she'll vote to move ahead on health care bill

Democrats have hit the magic number of 60 to move ahead on historic health care legislation. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story