Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

'Zero to Five:' A scam to help teachers union

Examiner Editorial
-
June 1, 2009

Next to universal health care, President Obama’s top domestic goal is government financed pre-school for all three- and four-year-olds, regardless of family income. Obama promised his supporters at the National Education Association that he will spend billions on his “Zero to Five” early childhood education initiative, while assuring taxpayers of a $10 return for every dollar spent on the program. But there is no evidence that expanding the time American children spend in state-run schools will produce any educational benefits at all. On the contrary, two states – Georgia and Oklahoma - that have been offering state-funded universal pre-school for more than a decade were among the 10 states that made the least progress on the 2006 National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP)– the only standardized exams administered nationwide.

Georgia spends more than $325 million annually on its pre-school program, which serves more than half of all four-year-olds in the state. But a recent study by Georgia State University found that most of the program’s academic gains are lost by the end of first grade. In fact, Georgia pre-kindergarden students were indistinguishable from students who did not attend pre-school at all, leaving nothing to show for the state’s $4,200 per pupil annual expenditure. The same lack of discernible progress was also found in Oklahoma, where more than 70 percent of four-year-olds are enrolled in state-funded preschool at a cost of $7,400 per student. Fourth-grade NAEP reading scores actually declined in Oklahoma since universal pre-kindergarden began in 1998 - a negative bang for $139 million in taxpayer bucks Oklahoma spends each year. Besides this well-documented “fade out” effect, Stanford University researchers reported a higher level of negative socialization among children who spend even short periods of time in highly structured pre-school settings  – just what Obama is advocating for every pre-schooler in the nation.

“The solid evidence for the effectiveness of early intervention is limited to those conducted on disadvantaged populations,” concludes University of Chicago Nobel laureate James Heckman. But the federal government already spends $7 billion annually on its 40-year-old Head Start program for low-income children. There is no evidence that spending billions more on heavily subsidized pre-school for middle- and upper-income youngsters will provide any academic benefits at all. What “Zero to Five” is likely to do is drive small, privately-owned pre-schools out of business in order to create more jobs for NEA members – who will be the real beneficiaries of this latest educational scam.

 


beltway confidential

Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., who represents Northern Virginia, announced he will vote for the health care bill. Connolly had been on the fence, in part because his district is a...

House members voted 242-192 to allow the Democrats' $1.2 trillion health-care bill to proceed to general debate, which will last about four hours. It is still uncertain whether...

As Democrats expand their health insurance reform bill from 1,000 to 2,000 pages, Republicans on the Joint Economic Committee expand their chart outlining how the new health...

President Obama says "we cannot fully know" what led Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan to kill 13 people and wound 38 others at Fort Hood, Texas Thursday. Hasan reportedly...


Most Popular Headlines



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Ralph Gizzip

Jun 1, 2009

If dollars per student was the predictor of how well those students would perform then the D.C. school system should be the best in the country.

What's that you say? They're actually the worst?

Imagine that!

 

Albert M.

Jun 1, 2009

Let me guess, what a shame that our teachers are stealing our money while private schools are fighting to bring us cheap education. Keep up the jokes, bro, and you will big time next time. ..

 

Nick Beddoes

Jun 1, 2009

Pre-K education is vitally important for poor kids and for the large and growing number of kids for whom English is not their first language. The evidence for this is abundant right here in Montgomery County. And private pre-K teachers who qualify can surely find jobs in public schools. The Obama administration is to be commended for going forward with this.

 

Kathryn

Jun 1, 2009

Commenter Nick didn't cite any evidence for his support of this type of pre-K programs. Yet, the article cited TWO examples of why they DON'T work. Liberals disregard facts to all of our detriments.

 

Don L.

Jun 2, 2009

The article misses the real scary part. Forget the unions -they won -they'll take the booty, suck it up. What bothers me is that we are allowing the Godless-socialist government to stuff our most defensless minds full of their poison, taking by force of law, the children away from their parents, before they might contaminate them with God,resonsibility, fairness, and truth, before the state indoctrinates them. How do you think we got where we are? (The masses throwing away constitutional freedom for the free taking of other's well earned money)
The government education system (I confess to having been a dissident teacher in that system) has deliberately comntaminated the minds of the masses. How else could so many fall so easily for the pied piper from Chicago's tried and failed power grab?

Remember, Jocylyn Elders was fired from Clinton's cabinet for saying publically that they intended to do this.

 

bill

Jun 2, 2009

Obviously Albert and Nick are products of public education. No facts, no logic, but they sure have a surfeit of self-esteem

 

David

Jun 2, 2009

My son has been enrolled in a structured educational program for 3 year olds during the past year. He is almost *sounding-out* reading now, and by virtue of little effort of my own.

Not all programs that happen to serve 3 year olds are created equal, folks.

Be careful not to let your disdain of the typical agent-monopoly union, or your disdain of things owned collectively by the public blind you to realities.

Some teachers are talented; some are not.

Some programs are the right medicine for the particular population served; some are not.

 

SEZME66

Jun 2, 2009

when will public school parents wake up? don't they notice when their children are graduated from high school with the reading, and math equivalency of a 4th grader! perhaps, when they start moving back in their old bedrooms with the intention of re-establishing permanent residence parents will figure it out! i only have to pay taxes to build these monoments to the NEA, you parents must feed them too!

 

Tex Expatriate

Jun 3, 2009

When the lefts began talking about a national program I could not find a single study that demonstrated any long term benefits for it. David, above, has a point. My grandchild Nadia began reading between two and three because everyone read to her. Now she's ten, reads at a level higher than today's average high school granduate, and speaks two languages. Yes, she has the genes, but she also received the encourgement. Children do not learn to speak their native language in pre-school or school; they learn to speak it at home. Early educational gains are made the same way, but by sending children to preschool.

 

just joe

Jun 3, 2009

Ok, lets take children from low income, low education families that utilize state-sponsored preschools and compare them to high income children who attend expensive private schools or who can afford a stay-at-home parent. Now lets assume the results of this comparison says something about the value of the preschools. lol

 

Dan the Man

Jun 4, 2009

“The solid evidence for the effectiveness of early intervention is limited to those conducted on disadvantaged populations,” that says it all. That's who these programs are directed at. Obama's plan isn't mandating pre-school, just funding it so that free pre-school isn't available only to the poor. Programs like this are directed at the most needy people. When you give a hand up to people who are losing at life and they still lose, don't blame the hand up.
Regarding "putting teachers of out jobs," qualified pre-k teachers can get those jobs. Unqualified pre-k schools are just day care.

 

Pat McGee

Jun 4, 2009

Why is it that other nations that fund public education get so much better performance from their students? Why do other nations in the industrialized world perform so much better than our students do academically? The issue is not whether education is funded by tax dollars. What is the answer? The dominant culture and parental expectations come to mind.

 

Pat McGee

Jun 4, 2009

I oppose putting students in school at an earlier age. I would advocate having them start a year later, when they are more mature and more able to learn. There is no evidence that starting students at an earlier age produces better-educated people.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Driver Carl Edwards zips his drivers suit in the garage after practice for Sunday's NASCAR Sprint  Cup Dickies 500 auto race at Texas Motor Speedway, on Saturday, Nov. 7, 2009, in Fort Worth, Texas.  (AP Photo/Ralph Lauer)

Edwards' thinking can't hide frustration; 9 Cup wins over 2 years includes 0 in '09

Carl Edwards has found a way to try to mask the frustration of his winless NASCAR Sprint Cup season. Full story

Politics

Demonstrators chant on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009, during a Republican health Care reform rally. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

House Democrats clear impasse over abortion holding up vote on health care legislation

Capping months of months of struggle, House Democrats cleared an abortion-related impasse blocking a vote on sweeping health care legislation late Friday and officials expressed optimism they had finally lined up the support needed to pass President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. Full story

Entertainment

'Golden Girls' star McClanahan has bypass surgery

Rue McClanahan, who played sexy Southern belle Blanche Devereaux on "The Golden Girls," was recovering Thursday from heart bypass surgery at a New York City hospital. Full story