Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Analysis of the House ACORN vote

By: Michael Barone
Senior Political Analyst
09/17/09 5:01 PM EDT

 

The House’s 345-75 vote to defund ACORN is indeed, as my Examiner colleague Byron York put it, extraordinary. Democrats voted 172-75 to defund ACORN; Republicans voted 173-0 to do so. This would not have occurred but for http://biggovernment.com/ the Big Government videos of ACORN employees encouraging tax evasion and prostitution. "Mainstream media" studiously ignored this big, big story, because it put Obama's political allies in ACORN in a bad light--such an egregious bit of biased coverage that it aroused derision and contempt from Jon Stewart on The Daily Show. But "mainstream media" couldn't cover up this scandal, as much as it wanted to. And once it was out in the open, the House Democratic leadership obviously decided it was riskier to block a vote and to deny many of their members a chance to cast an anti-ACORN vote than it was distasteful to collude in the defunding of an important part of the coalition that did so much to elect Barack Obama and the Democratic majorities in 2008.
 
Which leads to the question: who were the 75 House Democrats who voted not to defund ACORN? They included Majority Whip James Clyburn but not Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as is customary for speakers did not vote, but her Bay Area consiglieri George Miller and Anna Eshoo voted to defund the group. The 75 anti-defunding Democrats included several committee chairmen—Bob Filner, Nick Joe Rahall, Charles Rangel, Louise Slaughter, Bennie Thompson, Edolphus Towns and Henry Waxman—but not others. Chairmen Howard Berman, John Conyers, Bart Gordon, George Miller, James Oberstar, David Obey, Collin Peterson, Ike Skelton and John Spratt all voted to defund ACORN; Chairman Barney Frank was one of 11 members not voting (2 others voted present). Interestingly, Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers indicated earlier this year that his committee might investigate ACORN; then he changed his mind at the behest, he said, of “the powers that be.” Perhaps he will change his mind again, now that “the powers that be” have allowed ACORN to be repudiated.  
 
The 75 districts represented by members who voted against defunding ACORN delivered an average majority of 72%-26% for Barack Obama. Only two of those districts, represented by West Virginia Democrats Alan Mollohan and Nick Joe Rahall, voted for John McCain. By my count, 29 of those districts are represented by members of the Congressional Black Caucus and 7 districts by members of the Hispanic Caucus. The 11 districts of those not voting averaged 54%-45% for Obama and the 2 districts of those voting present averaged 77%-23% for Obama. By my calculation, that means the average vote in the districts of the 345 members who voted to defund ACORN was about 50%-48% for McCain. As indicated by members' votes,  mainstream America was clearly repulsed by the facts that "mainstream media" tried to conceal.

 




beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

David Ensign

Sep 17, 2009

I am deeply disappointed and, quite frankly, disgusted by the vote on the ACORN funding cut.
As I am sure you know, ACORN is one of the few organizations in the United States that works solely to assist the poor and most vulnerable citizens. As with any large organization, including the United State Senate, they have their problems and have made their mistakes.
But how is it possible to cut the tiny federal funds for ACORN and continue massive federal expenditures to contractors such as Blackwater, whose employees have killed people?
This is a craven political vote of the worst kind.
Sincerely,
Rev. Dr. David Ensign

 

LadynChesapeake

Sep 17, 2009

With all due respect, Rev. Ensign calls 8.5 BILLION dollars allocated out to ACORN in the stimulus package as "tiny federal funds" ???
Blackwater is contracted by the government to serve as bodyguards. Yes, they have killed people. They were hired by the government knowing this.
Most reasonable people think ACORN should get NO MORE of our tax dollars until they are investigated. Don't understand why some people have a problem with that.

 

Sep 17, 2009

Blackwater may be evil. But Reverend, don't use them as an excuse to support a group which, as we have learned, uses federal money to systematically aid and abet sex trafficking in vulnerable, underage immigrant girls.

 

Peter

Sep 17, 2009

ACORN would never have seen 8.5 billion dollars, even before any of this controversy. That is how much money they could have qualified for, but if they received any of it, it would have been a fraction of that amount.

Blackwater, KBS, all of the wall street firms who were bailed out, they have looted the government of trillions of dollars, whereas ACORN has received 53 million over 15 years.

 

Peter

Sep 17, 2009

KBR, as in Haliburton subsidiary, not KBS.

 

Roxane Towner

Sep 17, 2009

The Drs comments fail to point out that the millions of dollars of taxpayers dollars already in ACORN has not been accounted for therefore he can not tie our taxpayer dollars to poor and vulnerable citizens. In addition, ACORN IS NOT the sole organization that assist poor people. You would have to expand the standard definition of poor to include those living all over the US not just in downtown Democratically run cities. When will people like the good Dr realize the majority of our nations poor are in cities ran by Democrats for decades and yet they are looking forward to those politicians to 'fix' what they have created. Continuously doing the same thing expecting a different outcome is classically defined as crazy.

 

chicagomatt

Sep 17, 2009

anyone who is 'disgusted' by ACORN's funding being cut off either has not seen the the disturbing videos released almost daily for the last week, or they are just catching up because they limit themselves to network tv news sources.. and this whole thing is ON TOP OF the fact that they are already under investigation in something like 14 states for voter fraud. How can anybody with a conscience or who pays taxes stand behind such a corrupt and disgusting organization?...and save the Haliburton and Blackwater stuff for another day.. you are just a frustrated liberal trying to compare situations that are vastly different.

 

ggordon

Sep 17, 2009

uh David. These funding decisions should stand on their own - who cares about Blackwater. I'm sure that Congress - in their infinite wisdom will do the right thing.
Evidently there was enough evidence to convince even the democrats to defund. Frankly, there should be a RICO investigation - what we know is probably a small percentage of their illegal activity, or very poor advice giving. It is like an ongoing criminal enterprise. I'm not holding my breath though on Holder and the Obama department of very selective justice to do anything meaningful.

 

ggordon

Sep 17, 2009

why do any organizations - democratic or republican - get any money when it is done with very deep deficit spending? Gotta start somewhere. If they are so valuable to the community, they'll get there money privately.
People should go to their churches for assistance - and no, I'm not some religious zealot. Churches are just a good source of support.

 

USAMan

Sep 17, 2009

The Rev. Ensign's pathetic justification of the ACORN organized criminal conspiracy is a pathetic example of the knee-jerk support for those who bilk the American taxpayer and follow Saul Alinsky's dictum that their end justifies ANY means.

 

brett

Sep 17, 2009

Clearly funding for ACORN would be wrong at this point. Perhaps we should back off both parties and let them work. They did get it right in this case.

 

John

Sep 17, 2009

The Rev. Ensign although somewhat educated, is another example of an individual that thinks the three dimensional universe is just unfair and the Big Bang had major errors in creating the present reality. If he could survive a possible future Big Crunch, the Rev. might be a consultant to the Creative Forces during the next reality sequence. What the heck, he's probably a Fabian Socialist from the word, go.

 

Yehudit

Sep 17, 2009

Someone needs to get a screenshot of this before it disappears: ACORN endorsement on my.barackobama.com , also quotes showing how chummy the Prez has been with the group. I mean we know that but here it's in their own words.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/samgrahamfelsen/gGC7zm

 

gregg

Sep 17, 2009

Rev. Dr, you should be ashamed of yourself. To support a organization, which , as you can see, promotes prostitution, especially child is autrocious. Shame on you. May god forgives you of your sin.

 

Mike

Sep 17, 2009

The corruption of this ACORN organization is obvious and it was correct to defund it. The as yet to be answered question is how corrupt is SEIU and why are our politicians so anxious to force legislation through that benefits them? This needs to be thoroughly looked. Not only are we 50 trillion dollars in debt through unfunded liabilities, but our Congress keeps cranking out the money as though there is no tomorrow. The end result will be the total devaluation of currency and we will have our own corruption to blame.

 

ZooWH

Sep 17, 2009

Just wonder is Rev. Dr. David Ensign preaching the same places as Rev. Jeremiah Wright?

 

Bill

Sep 17, 2009

Rev. Ensign I'll say a prayer for you and for the record I am very gald that I do not go to your church.

 

elixelx

Sep 18, 2009

"All Comparisons are Odious", said Cervantes, and the comparison of ACORN to BLACKWATER, mooted by the first correspondent, is especially so.
After all, both organizations are supposed to save and protect lives, one with violence if need be, the other with love, where possible...
So Blackwater has done, is doing, its job...

 

ChemDaddy

Sep 18, 2009

How about reading what ACORN has to say about all this before passing judgement on the whole organization?

http://www.acorn.org/index.php?id=12439&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=22584&tx_ttnews[backPid]=12387&cHash=913db2b19b

Obviously the actions shown in these videos are wrong. Not much debate there. Aiding and abetting sex trafficing of minors is wrong.

But you can't turn around and say the whole organization is corrupt. That's not playing fair.

You can't turn around and say "ACORN promotes child prostitution". That's ridiculous.

When Micheal Vick went out and got involved in dog fighting nobody started shouting "The whole NFL is corrupt and supports the abusive treatment of animals! Stop wathcing football!".

How about an article or two talking about the good that has been done by ACORN?

 

Nolanimrod

Sep 18, 2009

Reverend is generally a description, not a title. Therefore, while I might call Dr. Ensign "the Reverend Dr. Ensign" it isn't part of his name.

I would not sign my own missives "The Glorious and Enlightened Nolanimrod." But then I would not be aghast at cancelling the Gold Card of a notorious criminal enterprise whose acts of "helping people" usually involve fraud, extortion, and protection racketeering.

 

jeanne

Sep 18, 2009

Washington Examiner and most of the Alternative Media completely missed the big story behind yesterday's vote to Defund ACORN -

It was included in the STUDENT LOAN BILL, WHICH THE HOUSE VOTED ON YESTERDAY WHICH LETS THE GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER THE STUDENT LOAN INDUSTRY.

That's the big news of the day which was totally ignored by even the Internet Alternative News and Bloggers -- except for a few enlightened folks -- like Michelle Bachmann wrote a column about it.

 

jeanne

Sep 18, 2009

Student loan market overhaul approved by U.S. House

* * * * * *

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE58G5KF20090917

House Expected to Pass Government Takeover of Student Loans

http://www.gopusa.com/news/2009/september/0917_student_loans.shtml

* * * * * *
Government to take over all student loans (Rep. Michele Bachmann)

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/education/59191-government-to-take-over-all-student-loans-rep-michele-bachmann

* * * * * *

Congratulations. You're about to own $100 billion a year in student loans.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203440104574405154157021052.html




 

Concerned Kev

Sep 18, 2009

Mr. Ensign:

You forgo the title reverend with is reserved for people of reverence. Supporting a group open to trafficking under-aged girls, tax evasion and assisting in the creation of a brothel does not command reverence.

 

JamesJ

Sep 18, 2009

When your only retort to an argument is :yeah, but Bush, Blackwater, Republicans did..." you lost the argument

 

StargazerInSavannah

Sep 18, 2009

Facts are that funding Acorn from the treasury is funding the enemy of this republic. It is much like donating all of your guns and ammunition to an organization working to kill you.

 

fedup

Sep 18, 2009

Obama owes a lot a ACORN, more than the $800,000 his election campaign funneled to them. Watch'em try to sweep this under the rug again and again and again. lieslieslie

 

Marcia

Sep 18, 2009

ACORN is nominally a non-profit, 501(c)3 organization. It cannot engage in partisan politics without being subject to IRS review and loss of its non-profit status. It and its subsidiaries are a get-out-the-vote organization for Democrats. Aside from being like termites eating away at the foundations of electoral democracy, ACORN is in violation of IRS law and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Most corrupt administration, ever, already.

 

wytshus

Sep 18, 2009

Looks like Obama is going to need a bigger bus....

 

Ed in Texas

Sep 18, 2009

ChemDaddy - your comparison to the NFL and Vick is interesting. If there were only a single instance of lawbreaking (or advising on how to break various laws), as in the Vick incident, you would be correct. But since there was only a single instance of NFL players conducting illegal dog fights, nobody would claim the NFL is an illegal organization. OTOH, there are at least 4 instances, in different cities, of ACORN workers openly advising methods to violate child sex abuse statutes, IRS statutes and ways to obtain a home loan fraudulently. And that doesn't take into consideration the multiple indictments in various states for election registration criminal violations. And the incident of the brother of ACORN founder embezzlement of $1 million USD, with no formal complaint made to authorities.

Nope, that dog won't hunt.

 

absolutelycrazy

Sep 18, 2009

The public is tire of being tire of funding programs that do not deliver results.

 

Liz

Sep 18, 2009

The so calledRev.has no business calling himself a man of God. Anybody who condones selling little girls lives for their own selfish gains is not any man the world needs to hear!!! Thank God the Gov. Was forced to do the right thing.

 

Wpbtonzlewis

Sep 18, 2009

This article & vote proves Glenn Beck's point about the problems with gerrymandered districts starting on page 50 of his book Common Sense,

 

Noel Granite

Sep 18, 2009

If the title 'Dr.'(Dr. Lamont Hill) and 'Rev.'(Rev.Jesse Jackson) have not already lost relevant status,they sure took a hit with that opening comment.One last thing my fellow political junkies,let's stop calling the CBC and other assorted black politicians 'liberal'.They are anything but.They just tie their train to the white liberal east/west coast politicians that promise the world as to get the black vote.As far as Waters/Van Jones and other assorted blacks who romanticize with communism, that's laughable.They have never lived under it and would fail miserably if they had to.

 

paulc

Sep 18, 2009

gents,

acorn is exploiting poor people, the guys at the top are stone cold felons and exploiting people. Isnt that obvious that they did not bat an eyelash at sex trafficking underage illegal immagrants? Nothing, repeat, NOthing could be more replusive!!

flush em!

 

mhsn

Sep 18, 2009

We who worked so hard for voter rights are
appalled with Acorn and its fraudulent voter registration programs in so many states. Those of us who worked for human
rights are appalled by so many Acorn offices having no problem with prostituting children. Shame on them and shame on those who defend them and enable them to continue in their immoral actions.

 

workit49

Sep 18, 2009


Thank You ChemDaddy for bringing some reason and sane analysis to this discussion about ACORN. The Far Right which has destroyed the Republican Party and this Nation will not be able to cover up the fact that on this issue as well as 99% of all the other issues, their perspective in unbelievably narrow.

 

Henry A. Mitchell

Sep 18, 2009

Why are we funding political action groups anyway? They even share offices with the Dem. Party in one of their locations.

What the Hell, churches, schools, Red Cross, and all the other thousands of "points of light" aren't good enough? My church doesn't get gov't largesse, why should f'n ACORN scumbags?

And it just begins with this episode; the voting scandals and all the rest--you folks defending this are truly the nutty left--even your Party won't defend it.

 

Insignia

Sep 19, 2009

The shocking issue is: How did ACORN get into the pockets of the American taxpayer in the first instance?

Congress is not staffed with stupid people, they know exactly what's going on. I want Congress to expalin how it is that Congress, as the custodian of the peoples' trust and money, made the decision to fund the corrupt ACORN organizations to the extent of $8.5 billion.

 

RabbitDawg

Sep 19, 2009

There is a certain hubris in the air here that concerns me. We should not be afraid, but let's not forget to watch our backs.
ACORN is more like a syndicate, than a simple band of community groups. They pull the strings of some very powerful people in high places, and these people are not going to melt away into oblivion.
Right now I can imagine that there are quite a few people within the ACORN structure that see this as an opportunity to regroup and attack back, and these people are not stupid. Socialist, but not stupid.
Sure, there has been some venomous whining about recording the few tea party nut cases among us, and even members of various right-wing fringe groups and churches, then publicizing the videos. That is not what worries me.
These folks have had a taste of power, and I do not doubt that, at least a few of them, will resort to any means necessary to regain it. No reason to be paranoid, but we need not be complacent, and we need to watch our backs.

 

jack wills

Dec 23, 2009

Jack Wills
Jack Wills Fashion
jack wills universityhref="http://www.huxhbuy.com/special.html">Cheap North Face
Discount North Face Jacket

 

Nike Dunk SB

Dec 23, 2009

Nike Air Max
Nike Shox Shoes
Nike Dunk SB
Air JordansCheap North Face
Discount North Face Jacket

 

UGG Classic Mini

Dec 23, 2009

UGG Classic Mini
UGG クラシックミニ
UGG Classic TallCheap North Face
Discount North Face Jacket

 

uggs in china

Dec 23, 2009

uggs in china
ugg 5815
uggs from chinaCheap North Face
Discount North Face Jacket

 

Work Boot

Dec 23, 2009

winter boot
Work Boot
caterpillar work boot
Caterpillar bootCheap North Face
Discount North Face Jacket

 

free

Dec 25, 2009

النقد الاجنبى | böcek ilaçlama | ilaçlama | kene | fare | pire | fare ilaçlama | arı ilaçlama | çiyan | seo | seo

 

bob

Dec 28, 2009

This is actually really interesting regarding your fact article here, This article is very informative.
membuat Blog

 

John

Dec 30, 2009

You would have to expand the standard definition of poor to include those living all over the US not just in downtown Democratically run cities.

Trojan Horse Removal

 

Henry B.

Jan 4, 2010

How can anybody with a conscience or who pays taxes stand behind such a corrupt and disgusting organization? goose down duvet

 

Karston

Jan 12, 2010

Perhaps he will change his mind again, now that “the powers that be” have allowed ACORN to be repudiated. High School Diploma | Online GED | Online Homeschooling


 

EddyJhon

Jan 12, 2010

They pull the strings of some very powerful people in high places, and these people are not going to melt away into oblivion.Get Diploma | Nation High School Location

 

aris

Jan 14, 2010

great opinion, nice analisys. Thank you for sharing it



Aku Cuma Seorang Blogger Yang Cinta Seo | Arentin Astalog

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story