Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Do voters really want government health insurance?

By: Michael Barone
Senior Political Analyst
10/20/09 12:49 PM EDT

The headline on this morning’s Washington Post lead story, “Public Option Gains Support,” and the subhead, “CLEAR MAJORITY NOW BACKS PLAN,” would lead you to think that the answer to the above question is yes—and that the public has been moving in that direction. Like my Examiner colleagues Byron York and Chris Stirewalt, I think that’s misleading.

When you look at the actual question wording and numbers in the ABC/Post poll, you find that the percentage supporting and opposing “the proposed changes in the health care system by (Congress) and (the Obama administration)—no, I don’t know what the parentheses mean either—was 48%-48% in the ABC/Post’s mid-October poll, 46%-48% in its mid-September poll and 45%-50% in its mid-August poll.

In other words, there’s been no statistically significant change over the last two months.  Similarly, Barack Obama’s job approval and disapprorval on health care was 48%-48% in mid-October and exactly the same in mid-September.

So what’s the headline referring to? Two questions, I think. One is whether respondents favor or oppose having “the government create a new health insurance plan to compete with private health insurance plans?” The numbers were 57%-40% in October, 55%-42% in September and 52%-46% in August. That looks like a mild upward trend. But it’s significantly lower than the response in June, when voters had had much less time to ponder the issue: 62%-33%.

The other question is one that ABC and the Post have not asked before, whether respondents favor a bill providing government-sponsored health insurance for people who can’t get affordable private health insurance which doesn’t have Republican support or a bill without such a provision which does have Republican support. The responses: 51% favor the first option, 37% the second.
 
But note that the poll shows only 19% having a great deal or a good amount of confidence in Republicans in Congress making good decisions. Putting a Republican label on any proposal would tend to reduce support for it, particularly when you haven’t put a Democratic label on the alternative.

he surprise here is that about twice as many respondents who have confidence in Republicans in Congress would still prefer a Republican-supported bill to one with a private option. Since the question wasn’t asked before, we can’t get any sense of the trend of opinion.
 
I think the most meaningful question in any of these polls is the first one I discussed, whether people favor or oppose the legislation being considered in Congress. We can’t expect ordinary citizens to have detailed knowledge of particular provisions, nor should we expect meaningful results when we ask them to pretend they’re Harry Reid and decide whether to go for a public option or for an alternative acceptable to Republicans.

The overall trend of opinion on the Democratic health care proposals is clear from this graph in pollster.com. If anything, support is falling; it certainly isn’t growing.
 

 




beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...

Clearly it's just a joke, but a bad joke. Washington Post writer Monica Hesse writes of the irresistible nature of the Twilight book series about vampires written primarily for...


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

StopSocialism

Oct 20, 2009

The two worst excuses for "news"papers, the washington post and new york times, continue to spew forth their endless loony-left socialist lies, distortions, half-truths, propaganda and baseless slime attacks against anyone who disagrees with their perverse views. They are the lowest of the low, the slime beneath the slime, the bottom of the barrel when it comes to journalism.

To illustrate the perversity of the WaPo bias, look at their explanation of how they get "poll" results. By their own admission (these admissions suggest they feel guilty from their outrageous crimes against responsible journalism), they intentionally distort the pool of respondents to increase the number of those expected to support their loony-left agenda. Most people call this "fixing the result".

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Houston Rockets coach Rick Adelman, center, reacts with his staff Jack Sikma, left, and Elston Turner, right, to a called foul against his team as they play the Atlanta Hawks during the third quarter ...

Tracy McGrady says he's ready to play, Rockets believe it's still too soon after knee surgery

Tracy McGrady is eager to play. The Houston Rockets say he'll have to wait. Full story

World

42 dead, 66 trapped underground in state-run coal mine explosion in northern China

A gas explosion tore through a state-run coal mine in northern China on Saturday, killing 42 people and leaving 66 others trapped underground as rescuers worked hastily to save them. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story