Washington Examiner  home delivery | classifieds | autos | jobs | real estate | home listings | advertise
   
Arts on Foot
View today's E-Dition

Monday, September 6, 2010 | Last Update 12:11 EDT
click for forecast
Untitled Document
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classified Cars Homes Rentals Remodel
Nation World Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays Opinion Zone Capital Land Mobile Site Contact
Nation World Science Education Video Technology
Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York Timothy P. Carney
Capital Land DC Virginia Maryland Local Opinion Zone Crime Transportation People Education Real Estate
Editorials Beltway Confidential OpinionZone Nate Beeler Columnists Mark Tapscott Dave Freddoso Mark Hemingway
Your Money Real Estate Technology K-Street
Cheers & Jeers Redskins/NFL Wizards/NBA Caps/NHL Nationals/MLB United/MLS Colleges Golf
Yeas & Nays Art Movies Television Health Food Music Scoop Theater Wheels Video Events Calendar
Jobs Buy Stuff Post Free Ad Personals Events
Automotive News New Used Certified Pre-Owned
Real Estate News Rent a Home Buy a Home Home Makeover

Opinion
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

Hair poll reality check: Not offensive

By: Julie Mason
Examiner White House Correspondent
07/29/10 3:49 PM EDT

Thanks, Gavin. I like your hair, too.    (ap photo)

Certain feminist elements of the Internet -- and also those for whom the hairier aspects of politics seem a continual surprise -- are presently bunched up over Tuesday's Public Policy Poll that asks Californians whether Barbara Boxer or Carly Fiorina has the better hair. Cueing outrage:

Not the hair! So sexist! Can't we move beyond judging women for their looks?!

We can and do. The poll also asks about job performance, voter preference and Barack Obama (but not his hair). When concerns like hair and wardrobe cease to be stealth issues for voters (and yes, the news media), then candidates and consultants will quit polling on them.

See: Hillary Clinton's pantsuit, an enduring sartorial icon of the 2008 campaign. It was a dowdy symbol of the "everywoman," now jettisoned by the secretary of state for a much more sophisticated, expensive, subtle wardrobe that would not have worked at all for a presidential candidate.

This stuff matters -- signals, cultural cues, symbolism. We do believe Gavin Newsom needs to rethink his hair care products.

And look at you right now! Itching to know whether Boxer's tousled, highlighted big hair trumps Fiorina's severe, sleek/chic pixie cut! Nineteen percent had a higher opinion of Boxer's hair, to 14 percent who prefer Fiorina. And bless the 67 percent who were not sure.

The PPP pollster Tom Jensen told TPMDC that yeah, the hair thing was a silly question, but it had become an issue in the campaign when Fiorina was caught on an open mic insulting Boxer's hair. Per TPMDC:

Jensen also pointed out that in January 2008 they asked South Carolina voters who was the sexiest presidential candidate, and also asked New Jersey voters last October whether then-Gov. Jon Corzine (D) was making an issue of his (eventually victorious) Republican opponent Chris Christie's weight, and whether Christie's weight was a legitimate issue.

And, historical note: In the 1980s, a wealthy supporter of Tom DeLay commissioned a poll that showed Republicans with facial hair were not electable. It was the only thing that persuaded DeLay to lose the cheesy moustache. It was also demonstrably true.



More from Julie Mason

  • Obama hopes for movement in Middle East peace process
  • Obama urges nation to "turn the page" on Iraq, work to heal economy
  • Oval gets makeover; cue Beltway screaming
  • Obama blames GOP for economic "blockade"
  • A really good point about the whole, "Obama: Muslim" thing


Follow The Examiner

beltway confidential
Tony Blair

Dipping into  Tony Blair’s just published A Journey leads me toward the conclusion that Matthew D’Ancona articulates with great clarity in the Sunday Telegraph. Blair is really...

—Michael Barone

Barney Frank’s response to my column

In my August 23 Examiner column I wrote, “The 2009 stimulus package is so unpopular that Democrats have banned the word from their campaign vocabulary. ‘I’m not supposed to call...

—Michael Barone

With unemployment at 9.6 percent, why is the White House obsessed with sex?

Christina Romer has left as Chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), and the White House is looking to fill the position. Can somebody please wake me when...

—Mark Hemingway

Weekend Examiner: Six ways to lose your election

Looking for a way to lose your election? Try lying to the voters. Or hire this guy as your spokesman. Or lie about your law enforcement background. Or get arrested for...

—David Freddoso

More Beltway Confidential posts...




Today’s Featured Writers
James Carafano
James Jay Carafano: Catching immigration 'criminals' is not enough
Gregory Kane
No surprise that Miss Mexico won Miss Universe
Hugh Hewitt
Seventy percent of Americans know they've been conned
Mark Hemingway
With unemployment at 9.6 percent, why is the White House obsessed with sex?
Jonetta Rose Barras
A Ward 3 feeling in Ward 7


Examiner Opinion Zone
Regulating and intimidating free speech out of existence

Bill Clinton once told an audience in Philadelphia, "You know one of the things that's wrong with this country? Everybody gets a chance to have their fair say." It was...

—Rob Port

Notes on the race to replace Charlie Melancon in the La. 3rd congressional district

It’s unclear whether Jeff Landry’s win in the Republican primary for Louisiana’s 3rd Congressional District which Charlie Melancon (D-La) is now resigning...

—Laura Curtis

Could Democrats lose it all in November?

Indications from many sources continue to suggest that November could be a sledge-hammer-to-the-forehead election for Democrats. Political pundits have watched as poll...

—Lynn R. Mitchell

More Examiner Opinion Zone posts...

To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines
  1. Glenn Harlan Reynolds: Who is responsible for Warmabomber's violent agenda?
  2. With unemployment at 9.6 percent, why is the White House obsessed with sex?
  3. Fearing for image, First Lady's aides warned against Spain vacation
  4. Higher education bubble poised to burst
  5. Weekend Examiner: Six ways to lose your election
  6. New evidence undermines feds' case against Arizona
  7. Barney Frank’s response to my column
  8. Interior Designer-in-Chief
  9. Michelle Malkin: Obama spending Labor Day with real thugs
  10. Examiner Editorial: If Obama won't investigate ACORN, new Congress should





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words. Comments that advocate violence, racism, or libel as well as comments written in ALL CAPS are not permitted.


blog comments powered by Disqus

RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Intern | Video | Maps | Mobile | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Rack Locations | Advertise