Washington Examiner  home delivery | classifieds | autos | jobs | real estate | home listings | advertise
   
Passport to the Podium
View today's E-Dition

Sunday, August 1, 2010 | Last Update 3:54 EDT
click for forecast
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classified Cars Homes Rentals Remodel
Nation World Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays Opinion Zone Capital Land Weather Mobile Site RSS Feeds Contact
Nation World Science Education Video Technology
Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York Chris Stirewalt
Capital Land DC Virginia Maryland Local Opinion Zone Crime Transportation People Education Real Estate
Editorials Beltway Confidential OpinionZone Nate Beeler Columnists Mark Tapscott Dave Freddoso Mark Hemingway
Your Money Real Estate Technology K-Street
Cheers & Jeers Redskins/NFL Wizards/NBA Caps/NHL Nationals/MLB United/MLS Colleges Golf
Yeas & Nays Art Movies Television Health Food Music Scoop Theater Wheels Video Events Calendar
Jobs Buy Stuff Post Free Ad Personals Events
Automotive News New Used Certified Pre-Owned
Real Estate News Rent a Home Buy a Home Home Makeover

Opinion
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

How price regulation can benefit the big retailers

By: Timothy P. Carney
Examiner Columnist
03/09/10 7:15 PM EST

Big business lobbying for and profiting from big government -- to the detriment of small business -- is my beat, and The American Spectator today tells the tale of another incidence of Regulatory Robbery.

On the table is a bill to prohibit manufacturers from placing certain conditions on the retailers who want to sell their goods. In a practice called "Resale Price Maintanence," manufacturers sometimes tells stores, in effect: if you want to sell our goods, you can't sell them below the minimum price we dictate.

Competitive Enterprise Institute researcher Jonathan Moore explains why big retailers are lobbying to outlaw this practice by manufacturers:

Consider a consumer shopping for a brand new plasma TV or DVD player. A consumer could ask a salesperson at a small high-end electronics store to show him exactly how it works. He would then receive a tutorial explaining all of the device's features. The retailer provides these services in order to increase the number of consumers spending money in their store.

This service costs money and time for the store. They must pay an employee who has to devote his time to educating customers rather than other tasks needed to keep the store running efficiently. Further, educating the employee on new product features costs the store time and money.

Now what happens if the customer walks out of the store, with the knowledge he has just received for free, turns on his laptop and purchases the item from an online discount store? The customer and the discount store are free riders, both benefitting from the high end store's service without have to pay for it, while the high end store loses out on the money and time they could have saved by not providing the service.

RPM, however, can thwart this free rider problem. If the manufacturer sets a minimum price for a good, competition between retailers continues, it simply takes a different form; that of a race to the top of the quality of service the retailers provide.

If the practice becomes illegal, the result will be that huge discount retailers such as Wal-Mart, eBay, and Amazon will benefit greatly from the free rider problem discussed above. Outlawing alternative pricing measures intended to ensure that people do not take advantage of the free services offered by specialty stores will ensure that discount retailers will be able to grab a larger market share than perhaps would be possible in a free market.

The battle over RPM is just another anecdote which calls into question the conventional wisdom that big business always opposes new regulations, preferring the anarchic free market.



More from Timothy P. Carney

  • When your lobbying is so clearly self-interested, maybe you should be more subtle
  • How GOP can trump Dems on special interests
  • Calling bull on Biden's pretend war against 'corporate interests'
  • Are big hotels using the tax code to hurt Priceline, Expedia
  • Another way in which government creates housing bubbles


Follow The Examiner

beltway confidential
Eight congressmen now calling for Rangel to give up his seat

The Hill: The tally of House Democrats calling on Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) to resign his seat in Congress stood at eight as members adjourned for the August recess late...

—Mark Hemingway

Growing ‘independent’ nature of electorate is helping GOP

The proportion of Republicans, Democrats, and independents that turnout to vote shape the outcome of every election.  Even small shifts in these percentages can dramatically...

—Gary Andres

It’s not just Rangel — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., to be tried on ethics charges

Here’s your Friday night news dump — move over Charlie Rangel: Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) has chosen to go through an ethics trial, like the one lined up for...

—Mark Hemingway

NYT: ‘No more disputing’ economic recovery has slowed down, jobs outlook ‘discouraging’

With the dismal GDP figures that came in today, The New York Times isn’t mincing words. The outlook for jobs and economic growth is bleak: There is no more disputing it:...

—Mark Hemingway

More Beltway Confidential posts...

Capital Land, the Examiner's local news blog




Today’s Featured Writers
Bill O'Reilly
What about the things Sherrod did wrong?
Diana West
Admitting Turkey to EU means Eurabia
Diane Dimond
Time to close the door on a bad idea -- early prison release
Steve Chapman
Traditional marriage advocates capitalize on criticism
Mona Charen
Washington Post finds waste -- in government!
Michael Barone
Voters want supersized government to crash diet
Meghan Cox Gurdon
To kids, Botticelli's Venus is just a buck-naked woman


Examiner Opinion Zone
How do bureaucracies work?

One respectable answer is that they don't. Many an op-ed has been written to elaborate the point, but this won't be one of them. Such answer is neither useful nor reassuring...

—Jason Kuznicki

Communist Monarchies

Outside of the Arabian Peninsula, where in the world do you think absolute monarchies still exist? A strong clue is given in this Daily Telegraph story about the fate of the...

—P.J. Gladnick

A different path to regime change in Iran

“The republic has no need of science or of chemistry.” With these words, a French tribunal confirmed its 1794 sentence of death on Antoine Lavoisier, the great...

—Neil Hrab

More Examiner Opinion Zone posts...

To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines
  1. Chris Matthews' daughter tackles the deficit
  2. WaPo buries Dem fundraiser’s fraud, highlights GOP fundraising scandal
  3. To historians, Obama pledged to ’speak less often’ in future
  4. It’s not just Rangel — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., to be tried on ethics charges
  5. Hapless SEC can now hide its secrets
  6. Obama unemployment news conference featured Va. woman convicted of drug fraud
  7. NYT: ‘No more disputing’ economic recovery has slowed down, jobs outlook ‘discouraging’
  8. Growing ‘independent’ nature of electorate is helping GOP
  9. Top GOP campaign donors charged with $550 million fraud
  10. Obama’s auto policy: All in the Democratic family





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words. Comments that advocate violence, racism, or libel as well as comments written in ALL CAPS are not permitted.


blog comments powered by Disqus

RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Intern | Video | Maps | Mobile | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Rack Locations | Advertise