Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Is Recovery.gov really as useless as I think it is?

By: David Freddoso
Online Opinion Editor
11/16/09 6:03 PM EST

ABC reports on jobs that Recovery.gov lists as created in non-existent Congressional Districts. There are several such cases. Although ABC claims an exclusive, Townhall had something on this earlier today.

For all we know, these are real jobs and there was just a small mistake when the recipients reported their Congressional District. That's why we haven't added these to our Stimulus Inflation Map. But this is a very clear example of the low-quality job done in creating the Recovery.gov website.

This is a data quality issue, and a much simpler issue than the question of whether the jobs are real. It isn't too hard to limit input fields so that non-existent Congressional Districts don't make their way into a government website. The developers of Recovery.gov didn't bother.

Beyond the data quality issues, I find this site to be nearly useless. Until now, I've been hesitant to write about this, because I might just be revealing myself as a technological incompetent, but I can't help it anymore.

Among the reasons I hate Recovery.gov:
  • Its lousy search engine fails to find things that I know are there.
  • Because the search engine is so bad, your only option is to search for contracts by the awarding agency or by state. Unfortunately, it's not intuitive how to find the page where you can do this. The first few times I used the site, it was trial and error. (The trick is to bring up the big map and then find the small link down in the bottom left hand corner that says "Text View of Data.")
  • Once you find that, you can start looking at a state's grants. But you cannot change the number of results per page, nor can you filter or re-order the search results. You might have 100 pages of results, and you just have to wade through several pages before you find the right one.
  • In the text search, you cannot change the categories that come up with the results. Let's say, for example, you want to look at contracts in a given state ordered by the number of jobs they supposedly created. I can't figure out any way of doing this on the site. When you search by text, the number of jobs isn't even available as a category.
  • Your other option is to use the map and find the precise dot that represents the contract you're looking for. I've resorted to this a couple of times now. Good luck with that.
I may be doing something wrong. Perhaps I should be barred from ever using a computer again. But I've really lost my temper several times so far using Recovery.gov. Considering that the government spent $18 million developing this debacle, you'd expect that even I could figure it out.



beltway confidential

Just a few years after scandal nearly destroyed the Buckeye State's GOP, Rasmussen has the Ohio Republican candidates for governor and Senate leading their Democratic...

I've just been in touch with Sen. Christopher Bond, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Rep. Peter Hoekstra, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence...

The Audi ad mocking overzealous environmentalism "hits home," San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom tweeted during the Super Bowl. The locally conceived advertisement was enough to...

In a brief op-ed in USA Today, White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan charges that critics who question the Obama administration's decision to grant Miranda rights to...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

ladybug

Nov 16, 2009

$18 million could have employed quite a few jobs in our area. We even have techies out here who could have done a bang-up job.

I thought this was supposed to be the first tech-savvy administration.

 

ggordon

Nov 16, 2009

There are lies, and damnable lies. Obama and his people tell both, and present them poorly.

 

Metro Gnome

Nov 16, 2009

$18 million developing a website that doesn't work. What do you expect from the government for something that cost less than $1 billion? I help both government departments (state and federal) and private industry set up their new IT purchases, and believe me, the waste and incompetence in government is breathtaking. Not all the private companies are the best, but they most often err on the side of not spending money they should. Government departments invariably spend lots of money that they shouldn't -- there's just no real accountability for cost. Budgets are pretty much an abstract exercise.

But hey, let's have Washington run health care.

 

depaz

Nov 17, 2009

A web site is only as good as the info put into it. Remember GIGO (garbage in, garbage out)? When you consider the data is being input within an administration that's relied on smoke and mirrors for the past 11 months, well, 'nuff said. . . .

 

StepIntoTheLight

Nov 17, 2009

$18 million taxpayer dollars down the drain of federal government bureaucracy...all for the claim of open government and transparency. No wonder nothing works right on that website!

 

Sue

Nov 17, 2009

This is surely by design, throwing a whole mess of so called info out there,claiming to inform the public, while it is all smoke and mirrors, sucking up gazillions of taxpayers dollars....had enough yet?

 

asder

Jan 2, 2010

Thanks for your useful info, I think it's a good topic
çizgi film
kayu çizgi filmini izle
çizgi film izle

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Slideshow: Washington area snow photos

Here are some of the best snow photos in the DC area from the Associated Press, the Examiner' s own Andrew Harnik and courtesy photos from Kathleen Dellinger: Full story

Politics

Rep. John Murtha dies at 77

A spokesman says Democratic Rep. John Murtha of... Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story