Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Is the Washington Post trying to 'Macaca' Bob McDonnell?

By: Michael Barone
Senior Political Analyst
09/01/09 12:50 PM EDT

 

In the 2006 campaign season the Washington Post ran more than a dozen front-page stories on Senator George Allen’s reference, at an August 11 campaign stop almost 400 miles from Washington, to an opposition campaign staffer as “Macaca.” One of these stories, perhaps, had enough news value to be worthy of the front page; the others were placed there with the obvious intent of defeating Allen and electing his Democratic opponent Jim Webb, who did indeed win by a 50%-49% margin.

Now there’s a campaign on for governor of Virginia, and the news editors of the Post seem to be using their front page once again to defeat the Republican candidate, Bob McDonnell, and elect Democrat Creigh Deeds. To provide a fair perspective, we’ll start a Macaca watch, to list stories which make the front page of the Post not on the basis of news value but solely and obviously to defeat the Republican candidate.
               
Item number one on the Macaca Watch is the Sunday front page story on the thesis Bob McDonnell wrote in 1989 at Regent University where he obtained a masters degree in public policy and a law degree. This is, as the story acknowledged, a publicly available document and its contents would certainly be a legitimate part of an article on McDonnell’s background and the evolution of his political views. But the first paragraph of the story, prominently on the front page, sends the culturally liberal voters of Northern Virginia in the Post’s local circulation area a pretty clear message: you better not vote for this guy. He went to an “evangelical” school (Regent University Law School), described feminists as “detrimental” and “said government policy should favor married couples over ‘cohabitors, homosexuals or fornicators.’”
               
Item number two on the Macaca watch is Tuesday’s front page story headlined “Governor’s Race Erupts Over McDonnell’s Past View.” The “eruption” consists of a bunch of emails sent out by Democrats quoting from McDonnell’s thesis and a McDonnell conference call with reporters answering questions—pretty routine campaign stuff, hardly front page material. Interestingly, on the jump page one finds the following two paragraphs:
 
“Democrats have long attempted to characterize McDonnell as an ultra-conservative who is playing down his views on such issues as abortion, school prayer and gay rights so as not to alienate moderate voters, particularly in Northern Virginia, who increasingly decide statewide elections.
“But McDonnell's public record and his reputation among colleagues paint a more complex portrait. He appears as a man with deeply conservative views that spring from a strong Catholic faith but also as reasonable, open-minded and increasingly focused on such issues as jobs and transportation.”
 
Those are pretty fair-minded descriptions of the arguments the two sides are marking. One wonders how they got in here: did a fair-minded editor insist on including that second paragraph over the objections of a partisan reporter, or vice versa? But of course they’re not as prominent in the story as the lead paragraph’s reference to “what he [McDonnell] wrote about working women, homosexuals and ‘fornicators.’”
               
The obvious agenda here is to raise the specter that if McDonnell is elected, all women in Virginia will be fired from their jobs and forced to stay home knitting or driving car pool. We’ll see how much longer the Post can keep this story on the front page.

Update: The Washington Post published two more stories about McDonnell's thesis on Wednesday. Read the update here.

 




beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...

Clearly it's just a joke, but a bad joke. Washington Post writer Monica Hesse writes of the irresistible nature of the Twilight book series about vampires written primarily for...


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Commentator

Sep 1, 2009

The thesis was pretty intellectually shoddy, regardless of its political leanings. I bet Bill Kristol, if he had been the thesis advisor, would not have approved it.

 

Karen

Sep 1, 2009

The Washington Post is written by deranged feminist -- and that's the men!

Beware the backlash. Odd how the Washington Post wouldn't read Sonia Sotomayor's writings, Michelle Obama's tthesis, or Obama's communist manifestos.

WaPo. Stinks.

 

Clearheaded

Sep 1, 2009

Once again, the "Maximum IQ" test is in place for commenters of the Examiner. If your IQ is over 70, you cannot post. "Obama's Communist Manifestos" Check, that's an idiot.

 

erich

Sep 1, 2009

Even the "fair-minded" second paragraph contrasts "deeply conservative views that spring from a strong Catholic faith" with being "reasonable [and] open-minded."

 

Tsk, tsk.

Sep 1, 2009

"Obama's Communist Manifestos" Check, that's an idiot.

You're missing some punctuation there, Albert Einstein.

 

idiotfinder

Sep 1, 2009

"Obama's Communist Manifestos -- Check, that's an idiot"

I don't think so. From what we're seeing, Obama IS a communist and so are most of his Czars. So those who deny that are truly the idiots. How's those three fingers pointing right back at you when you point your finger at someone else feel?

 

Kenneth Ryan James

Sep 1, 2009

I have to wonder where the Washington Post was when Barack Obama kept his thesis under lock and key.

 

Publius

Sep 1, 2009

I am still waiting on anything that Obama wrote during his college years.

 

Toutatis

Sep 1, 2009

Whoo boy, here goes Michael Baloney off on an idiot tangent. Here's a candidate for governor who openly advocates violating the Constitution and taking anti-American and unChristian positions and that's supposed to be off limits? The Macaca statement was a deeply hurtful and discriminatory statement more reminiscent of pre-Brown V Board VA than today and these hurtful and discriminatory statements are of the same ilk. The WaPo has become a great right-wing amplifying machine and few liberals even read it any more, but if this statement is true about illuminating the idiotic right-wing unAmerican rants of a so-called Republican, hurrah for the WaPo.

 

Sep 1, 2009

I have this crazy idea. Maybe the Post wouldn't have had anything to write about if Allen had not made the racist, bullying remark or had a past that included stuffing a severed deer head in a black family's mailbox and sporting a Confederate flag when he lived in CALIFORNIA.

Maybe, just maybe, the Post wouldn't have had anything to write about if McDonnell had not denigrated all working women when he was 34 years old, i.e. old enough to know better.

Just a crazy thought that maybe people should take responsibility for their actions, as opposed to blaming everything on the media.

 

Evan

Sep 1, 2009

Oh NOES, the WaPo reported the candidate's actual words!

Wingnut welfare outrage!!

 

robotech master

Sep 2, 2009

"or Obama's communist manifestos."

How do you know this? I mean all of obama records are sealed up tighter then fort knox.

Obama could have written a paper saying how he wanted to be elected to president and would throw millions of white ppl in ovens and we would never know...

O course papers like(WaPo) this have lots of interests in colleges records of repubs... but obama nah his records and views completely unimportant... we all know that as a black guy someone probably wrote all his papers and such for him so reviewing his papers are meaningless since they are not his views anyway.

 

Elrod

Sep 2, 2009

That's funny, Barack Obama and Bob McDonnell both wrote significant works at age 34. McDonnell's was a Master's Thesis spelling out his plan for a Christian Taliban takeover of America, stressing the importance of politicians not fessing up to their real agenda. Obama, at 34, wrote "Dreams From My Father."

If one document is to be considered as part of the man's political outlook, so should the other.

 

Martin Knight

Sep 2, 2009

Toutatis: It's already been established that the story that Allen put a "severed deer's head in a black family's mail box" was entirely made up by the so-called "source" Salon hired to front their story.

Elrod: Let's see - apparently, the Left is putting its all into convincing Virginians that McDonnell wants to kill women that get educated and work outside the home. I'm just wondering how that is going to square with the fact that two of his daughters hold Masters' Degrees (including one in Computer Science) and have careers, his wife has long had a career outside the home, and that he has had no problem with hiring and promoting women in both public and private life since he wrote the paper.

Hmm?

 

Greg

Sep 2, 2009

Vote for Taliban Bob McDonnell:

He now thinks it's OK for women to work!

 

corsair

Sep 2, 2009

As a conservative/libertarian Atheist who supports a woman's right to choose an abortion, I think that deep in his heart this McDonnell guy probably wants his god to send me to hell for all eternity. That's fine. I can live with him being a moron. I still might vote for him.

That being said, what I want to know is whether this guy is lying now about his views on women and gays or if he was lying then? Did he just write that tripe because he thought his teacher would give him a better grade? Was he sucking up? Lying? Or did he really believe that Taliban crap back then? And don't pull the "youthful indiscretion" stuff. This guy was 35 when he wrote the paper and had been around. I knew when I was 20 that the crap he was espousing was nonsense.

So which is it? Lying then? Lying now? Changed for the better? Utter nincompoop at the age of 35? Sleazy, suck up, brown noser in grad school? Do we get to judge this guy on character or not?

 

Sep 2, 2009

Boy, it's nice to see liberals running another issues-based campaign; McDonnell is now the American Taliban (that'll drive a good policy debate!) Liberals whine that they get shouted down at town halls by people with opposing views, but when someone like Mackey writes a well constructed contrary opinion they boycott rather than debate. When did thuggery and bullying become the core of modern liberalism?

 

BlogDog

Sep 2, 2009

I remember as far back as the Gilmore-Beyer contest where the WaPo had a piece well in advance of the race which advanced the characterization that "Beyer reads books" while Gilmore "throws the book at people."
Perhaps a more accurate characterization was that prosecutor Gilmore protects the public while car-salesman Beyer tries to sell his vehicles to an victimized public.
Of course I exaggerate but the narrative for the ComPost doesn't change.

 

dcmatthews

Sep 2, 2009

"When did thuggery and bullying become the core of modern liberalism?"

They've been a part of modern "liberalism" as far back as I can remember, from Ted Kennedy's mendacious and slanderous attacks on Robert Bork during Bork's confirmation hearings all the way up to characterizing opponents to health care "reform" as thugs, Nazis, and astroturfers, while busing in actual union thugs to pack town-hall meetings to intimidate opposition (cf. Alan Grayson)

 

ahem

Sep 2, 2009

I wonder too if Webb even really won. Sadly, the last results that came in that night were from Arlington-- an area one might expect that would have the fastest ability to return a quick count. Or, is Arlington an area now, kind of like Chicago in the 1960's, where you wait to submit the number when you know the number that you need.

 

ahem

Sep 2, 2009

I think in addition to Sunday and Tuesday Front Page.

Add Monday and Wednesday Local section story. 4 days in a row.

Important stuff for the Washington Post Tabloid.

 

James

Sep 2, 2009

The tipoff: they assigned three (3!) people to write a 'review' of a student paper.

Look for the Post to revisit this 'story' over and over.


When will these dinosaurs take the hint and die?

 

Trouble

Sep 2, 2009

Just what the hell is a "Master's Degree in Public Policy"?

When are we going to get some candidates with real college degrees, like Finance, Engineering, Medicine, etc.

FWIW, I wrote some goofy stuff in college also, but I was 20 at the time.

$0.02

 

inspectorudy

Sep 2, 2009

Why is it that only Republicans have their past used against them? Why is it that anyone who has ever written a paper in college has to be held to its content for the rest of their lives? Where was Hillary held accountable for her rediculous paper on children suing their parents? Hell, for that matter, where is ANYTHING Obama wrote? (He did not write his two acclaimed books). Are we no longer allowed to change our views as we age? Lying then or lying now. What a cute expression. You could apply that phrase to almost all the things Obama ran on. Can't the mensas at WaPo write an article based on the positions of the two candidates instead of their views twenty years ago. Where is Deeds paper from twenty years ago. Was he smart enough to write a paper twenty years ago? These are journalistic questions that I know will go unanswered by the star reporters at the ComPost.

 

Magic

Sep 2, 2009

The Washington Post has been a DNC sponsor for a very long time. It has been an Obama cheerleader since his speech telling the world what a wonderful person Mr. (I was in Vietnam) Kerry was. The idea that you would hear anything remotely like the truth from the post is just wishful thinking.

 

Ryan

Sep 2, 2009

I don't think you can Macaca someone else you can only do it to yourself. With his bigoted writing McDonnell has Macaca-ed himself. He's toast.

 

Amphipolis

Sep 2, 2009

If you read the word detrimental in context, it is clear that McDonnell is not saying working mothers are detrimental to families, but that day care subsidies and institutional day care are.
http://patterico.com/jury/2009/09/02/bob-mcdonnell-misrepresented/

 

PTnMaryland

Sep 2, 2009

Michael Barone is a prissy old woman and a FOX News hack. I'm not sure why any credible news organization takes him seriously.

 

Mark Turner

Sep 2, 2009

"PTnMaryland

Sep 2, 2009

Michael Barone is a prissy old woman and a FOX News hack. I'm not sure why any credible news organization takes him seriously."

The problem is not Barone, it is your forked-up perception of credible.

 

mturner@sprinet.net

Sep 2, 2009

Ryan

Sep 2, 2009

"I don't think you can Macaca someone else you can only do it to yourself. With his bigoted writing McDonnell has Macaca-ed himself. He's toast."

If by toast, you mean comfotably ensconced in the the gubernatorial mansion next january following a double-digit victroy, then yes, he certainly is toast.

 

will_in_sf

Sep 2, 2009

a thesis from decades ago is a deliberate distraction from the issues of now. its the job of the gop to drive that point home and win what should be a shoo-in election for them.

 

RaiderDan

Sep 2, 2009

The Deeds campaign, and the Washington Post, (but I repeat myself) are clearly looking at the polls and panicking. This is more like the LA Times watching their boy Gray Davis in California lose to the Terminator and dialing up the "groping" hit piece days before the election. I used to think the Washington Post had a little more credibility than the LA Times and the New York Times, but now I realize they're just another dinosaur liberal big city paper that thinks it can manipulate elections. Sad, really. I'm sure the ombudsman (read in-house apologist) at the Washington Post will be explaining away the paper's bias again in another high-handed manner that us simpletons just won't understand.

 

Amy

Sep 2, 2009

Give me a break. Jim Webb certainly had a past history about writing things about the role of women which most feminists would disagree with. Democrats certainly didn't think that he wasn't a strong, viable candidate and didn't rush out to picket him. Reading between the lines, Webb clearly only rephrased his opinion in a more palatable way while McDonnell actually demonstrates through his home and public life his real beliefs.

 

Sep 2, 2009

Barone is simply warning people about the one-sided reporting of the Washington Post.

I also think inspectorrudy in the comments has asked fair and honest questions. By reporting in an exclusively negative way on the Republican's history, and leaving the Democrat's background blank, the Post actively and deliberately misleads. The voter is left to compare an ordinary human being with a Walt Disney cartoon.

We all saw the 2008 election portrayal of Obama as something almost unearthly in his purity. This was not just partisan politics. It was a complete betrayal of the public trust.

Amphipolis also makes a good point: it's very easy to quote out of context.

--Or is that also an exclusively Democratic Party privilege?

The Washington Post should report honestly on both candidates, and let the voters decide, but that is now nostalgic. it won't, we'll just have to get our information somewhere else.

 

Anthony

Sep 2, 2009

Barone is simply warning people about the one-sided reporting of the Washington Post.

I also think inspectorrudy in the comments has asked fair and honest questions. By reporting in an exclusively negative way on the Republican's history, and leaving the Democrat's background blank, the Post actively and deliberately misleads. The voter is left to compare an ordinary human being with a Walt Disney cartoon.

We all saw the 2008 election portrayal of Obama as something almost unearthly in his purity. This was not just partisan politics. It was a complete betrayal of the public trust.

Amphipolis also makes a good point: it's very easy to quote out of context.

--Or is that also an exclusively Democratic Party privilege?

The Washington Post should report honestly on both candidates, and let the voters decide, but that is now nostalgic. it won't, we'll just have to get our information somewhere else.

 

Steve

Sep 2, 2009

Why is the Examiner trying to bail out this clown? He's yet ANOTHER example of how disconnected the Republican Party is from most voters.

Rather than focusing on the Washington Post, the Examiner should concentrate on McDonnell's comments themselves. It's a classic Fox News trick: divert attention from the real issue to the "evil media."

Sorry, folks. McDonnell's freaky views have disqualified him from the governor's race. He could run for Grand Wizard of the Klan instead.

 

eh?

Sep 2, 2009

So, Obama's thesis is public as well?

 

Anthony

Sep 2, 2009

For all I know, McDonnell might have "freaky" views. But how would you know if you got it from the Washington Post?

 

Hahahaha

Sep 2, 2009

Hahahaha, Bob McDonnell thought Regent was a real school. Hahahah. Regent is about as real as the University of Send Me Ten Dollars Over The Internet and I'll Send You a Doctorate Diploma. Hahahahaha.

 

commonlogic

Sep 2, 2009

With the community organizer's disaster going from bad to worse, McDonnell will win easily. Everyone seems to forget that the dems have been in charge since 2006 (2007 in effect). Bush was a lame duck. Even with "macaca" or whatever the nonsense, and the massive disfavor with republicans and a huge generic dem advantage, Webb just barely managed a win. Things are much different now with the community organizer.

 

Martin Knight

Sep 2, 2009

Everyone should read the full passage where the words "detrimental" and "working women" appear. It turns out that the WaPo is being a bit naughty i.e. deliberately misleading about what McDonnell actually wrote;

"Republican concerns for fiscal austerity are easily impaled by an additional $1.3 billion a year in expenses. Surely the leadership recognizes that existing federal child-care programs already cost more that $6.9 billion in 1988. Further expenditures would be used to subsidize a dynamic new trend of working women and feminists that is ultimately detrimental to the family by entrenching a status-quo of non-parental primary nurture of children."

 

Bill Sanford

Sep 2, 2009

What's this? A candidate that favors families?

Macaca! Can't have that!

The MSM will pull out it's hate writers and put them on overtime. Little bit late, tho, MSM liberal folks... Your number is up... your identities are know... you lies, slander, bias un-professionalism is well documented.

So, go ahead, WaPo - we will just go elsewhere for our news. Lots, and lots, and lots of places now on the Internet...

 

Paisistratus

Sep 2, 2009

Sonia Sotomayor made one statement about a 'wise Latina' and it was front and center with the right for weeks.

McDonnell writes a full thesis full of this stuff (and when you write something you go back and proofread, edit, etc. so it's a lot more profound than something that is spoken) and somehow it is wrong to keep looking into it?

McDonnell says he's changed.

That's what Nixon said too.

 

Martin Knight

Sep 2, 2009

What is obvious is that the WaPo is counting on the bulk of its readers (particularly liberals e.g. Paisistratus, Elrod, Toutatis, etc.) to simply take their word for it, rather than check the thesis out themselves.

This is the so-called controversial statement the WaPo is hyping; "Republican concerns for fiscal austerity are easily impaled by an additional $1.3 billion a year in expenses. Surely the leadership recognizes that existing federal child-care programs already cost more that $6.9 billion in 1988. Further expenditures would be used to subsidize a dynamic new trend of working women and feminists that is ultimately detrimental to the family by entrenching a status-quo of non-parental primary nurture of children."

How can anyone say that the above translates to "working women are detrimental to families"?

 

Greg

Sep 3, 2009

So, your goal here is to point out how unfair the Post is being to Mcdonnell, by repeating every charge they make and giving them even more ink?

I understand your goal here may be to expose the Post's lack of journalistic integrity, rather than to promote or help McDonnell, but while exposing their hypocrisy, you're also helping them achieve their goal of spreading disinformation about McDonnell.

 

Mary

Sep 3, 2009

Re Barone's query of how the "fair-minded" paragraphs got into the article, I noticed years ago that DNCpapers always put a truthful statement on the topic in the penultimate paragraph. When reading the Baltimore SUN, for example, I got in the habit of going to that paragraph, usually hidden on a jump page, immediately after reading the first paragraph. The pattern was obvious: a front page hit job, ending with a 'full disclosure' CYA paragraph.

 

No Mo' bama Please

Sep 3, 2009

Toutatis
I'm wondering, does this mean WaPo should aggressively report on Obama's past endorsement of the socialist New Party or does this investigative guideline only apply to conservative candidates?

 

bobezza

Sep 3, 2009

Any ONE, any THING that is insulted or pleased by a person saying 'macaca' automatically negates not only their criticism but also their intellect.

 

rdstgrl

Sep 3, 2009

Macaca? What about all weeweed up? Whatever that means.

 

RKA

Sep 3, 2009

Hope I closed to bold type.

 

Earlobe

Sep 3, 2009

What a bunch of liberal whiners in WaPo--starting with the Graham family and the Buffett hypocritical capitalist pig.

 

thestalkinghorse

Sep 3, 2009

If Obama wrote "Dreams of My Father", then I wrote "Paradise Lost".

 

publicservant

Sep 3, 2009

I'm grateful we have a gubernatorial candidate in VA whose records and writings we can review- Obama became President while keeping under seal ALL records from college- his passport file, and his "vault" or "long form" birth certificate (if he has one) since all we've seen is an online document sans hospital name or doctor's signature. From his books we know Obama was nurtured by Communist Party- USA member, Frank Marshall Davis- so why is anyone surprised by his conduct in office- nationalization of banks, auto companies, a proposed government takeover of healthcare- and now that his agenda is exposed, his poll#s are plummeting.

 

Finn_McCool

Sep 3, 2009

20 years ago the WPOST was a popular and relevant newspaper...that was a LONG time ago. McConnell will win by double digits. Cheers

 

MarkF

Sep 4, 2009

Is it wrong to put kids in front of self? I mean really, is that so bad? Don't kids who are just born and spent nine months developing in the womb have the right to have their own mother hold them and take care of them? Is that a radical idea? Isn't it wrong to hand a kid over to hirelings? The real problem is that something is so wrong with the economy, and with our priorities too, that women are forced to work. But yeah, the Post is toast. I swore off reading it when it ran a story on Easter that Jesus was not the Messiah. "Happy Easter from your friends at the Post, and by the way, we think you're and idiot!" The Post has some great reporters and it's so much more professional than the Examiner. But, I'll cheer that day when the Post goes out of business, which will be within ten years, tops.

 

chris c

Sep 4, 2009

Give it up WAPO you can't change the election it is a referendum on Obama. Good luck.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Graphic surveys NFL players concerning concussions

NFL union pans commissioner's call for players to report on teammates' possible concussions

The NFL Players Association opposes commissioner Roger Goodell's call for players to tell their teams' medical staffs if they think a teammate shows symptoms of a concussion, saying that is not an adequate solution. Full story

Economy

NC state treasurer issues gift ban for employees, limits on soliciting for charity

State Treasurer Janet Cowell unveiled new rules Friday banning employees from taking gifts from companies that do substantial business with the agency and setting a limit on charitable solicitations. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story