Washington Examiner  home delivery | classifieds | autos | jobs | real estate | home listings | advertise
   
Passport to the Podium
View today's E-Dition

Sunday, August 1, 2010 | Last Update 3:44 EDT
click for forecast
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classified Cars Homes Rentals Remodel
Nation World Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays Opinion Zone Capital Land Weather Mobile Site RSS Feeds Contact
Nation World Science Education Video Technology
Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York Chris Stirewalt
Capital Land DC Virginia Maryland Local Opinion Zone Crime Transportation People Education Real Estate
Editorials Beltway Confidential OpinionZone Nate Beeler Columnists Mark Tapscott Dave Freddoso Mark Hemingway
Your Money Real Estate Technology K-Street
Cheers & Jeers Redskins/NFL Wizards/NBA Caps/NHL Nationals/MLB United/MLS Colleges Golf
Yeas & Nays Art Movies Television Health Food Music Scoop Theater Wheels Video Events Calendar
Jobs Buy Stuff Post Free Ad Personals Events
Automotive News New Used Certified Pre-Owned
Real Estate News Rent a Home Buy a Home Home Makeover

Opinion
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

Number-two Senate Democrat 'in the dark' about health care bill

By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
12/12/09 8:15 AM EST

In this photograph provided by "Meet the Press," Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., left, appear on "Meet the Press'" Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, at the NBC studios in Washington.

Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin admitted Friday that he is "in the dark" about the national health care bill currently under construction by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. In an exchange on the Senate floor, Republican Sen. John McCain asked Durbin, "Should we not at least be informed as to what the proposal is that the Senate Majority Leader is going to propose to the entire Senate?" Durbin's answer: "I would say to the senator from Arizona that I am in the dark almost as much as he is, and I am in the leadership." Durbin explained that during a Democratic caucus, Reid and the small group of senators involved in crafting the bill turned to their fellow Democrats and "basically stood and said, 'We are sorry, we can't tell you in detail what was involved.'"

"Isn't that a very unusual process?" asked McCain, noting that "we are discussing one-sixth of the gross national product; the bill before us has been a product of almost a year of sausage-making. Yet here we are at a position on December 12, with a proposal that none of us, except, I understand, one person, the Majority Leader, knows what the final parameters are, much less informing the American people. I don't get it."

"I think the senator is correct," Durbin answered, "saying most of us know the fundamentals, but we do not know the important details behind this." Durbin went on to claim that Reid is not to blame for the situation; rather, the blame lies with the Congressional Budget Office, which Reid has asked to do a cost estimate on the bill. "We may find that something that was sent over there doesn't work at all, doesn't fly," Durbin said. "They may say this is not going to work, start over." Therefore, Durbin said, Democrats are keeping it all a secret. "It is frustrating on your side," Durbin told McCain. "It is frustrating here." But, Durbin added, he hoped to have the Congressional Budget Office report soon.

Here is the entire exchange between the two senators:

Mr. McCAIN. Could I ask my friend about the situation as it exists right now? Right now, no Member on this side has any idea as to the specifics of the proposal the majority leader, I understand, has sent to OMB for some kind of scoring. Is that the way we want to do business, that a proposal that will be presented to the Senate sometime next week and voted on immediately--that is what we are told--is that the way to do business in a bipartisan fashion? Should we not at least be informed as to what the proposal is the Senate majority leader is going to propose to the entire Senate within a couple days? Shouldn't we even know what it is?

Mr. DURBIN. I would say to the Senator from Arizona, I am in the dark almost as much as he is, and I am in the leadership. The reason is, because the Congressional Budget Office, which scores the managers' amendment, the so-called compromise, has told us, once you publicly start debating it, we will publicly release it. We want to basically see whether it works, whether it works to continue to reduce the deficit, whether it works to continue to reduce the growth in health care costs.

We had a caucus after this was submitted to the Congressional Budget Office, where Senator Reid and other Senators who were involved in it basically stood and said: We are sorry, we can't tell you in detail what was involved. But you will learn, everyone will learn, it will be as public information as this bill currently is on the Internet. But the Congressional Budget Office has tied our hands at this point putting it forward. Basically, what I know is what you know, having read press accounts of what may be included.

Mr. McCAIN. Could I ask my friend from Illinois--and by the way, I would like to do this again. Perhaps when he can get more substance into many of the issues.

Mr. DURBIN. Same time, same place tomorrow?

Mr. McCAIN. I admit these are unusual times. But isn't that a very unusual process, that here we are discussing one-sixth of the gross national product; the bill before us has been a product of almost a year of sausage-making. Yet here we are at a position on December 12, with a proposal that none of us, except, I understand, one person, the majority leader, knows what the final parameters are, much less informing the American people. I don't get it.

Mr. DURBIN. I think the Senator is correct, saying most of us know the fundamentals, but we do not know the important details behind this. What I am saying is, this is not the choice of the majority leader. It is the choice of the Congressional Budget Office. We may find that something that was sent over there doesn't work at all, doesn't fly. They may say this is not going to work, start over. So we have to reserve the right to do that, and I think that is why we are waiting for the Congressional Budget Office scoring, as they call it, to make sure it hits the levels we want, in terms of deficit reduction and reducing the cost of health care.

It is frustrating on your side. It is frustrating here. But I am hoping, in a matter of hours, maybe days, we will receive the CBO report.

 



More from Byron York

  • To historians, Obama pledged to ’speak less often’ in future
  • A battle between Left and Right -- inside the GOP
  • Obama support falls among blacks, Hispanics
  • What does it take to be a ‘hero’ of JournoList?
  • Dems fear GOP oversight of Obama administration

Topics

health care reform , richard durbin , harry reid , john mccain


Follow The Examiner

beltway confidential
Eight congressmen now calling for Rangel to give up his seat

The Hill: The tally of House Democrats calling on Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) to resign his seat in Congress stood at eight as members adjourned for the August recess late...

—Mark Hemingway

Growing ‘independent’ nature of electorate is helping GOP

The proportion of Republicans, Democrats, and independents that turnout to vote shape the outcome of every election.  Even small shifts in these percentages can dramatically...

—Gary Andres

It’s not just Rangel — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., to be tried on ethics charges

Here’s your Friday night news dump — move over Charlie Rangel: Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) has chosen to go through an ethics trial, like the one lined up for...

—Mark Hemingway

NYT: ‘No more disputing’ economic recovery has slowed down, jobs outlook ‘discouraging’

With the dismal GDP figures that came in today, The New York Times isn’t mincing words. The outlook for jobs and economic growth is bleak: There is no more disputing it:...

—Mark Hemingway

More Beltway Confidential posts...

Capital Land, the Examiner's local news blog




Today’s Featured Writers
Bill O'Reilly
What about the things Sherrod did wrong?
Diana West
Admitting Turkey to EU means Eurabia
Diane Dimond
Time to close the door on a bad idea -- early prison release
Steve Chapman
Traditional marriage advocates capitalize on criticism
Mona Charen
Washington Post finds waste -- in government!
Michael Barone
Voters want supersized government to crash diet
Meghan Cox Gurdon
To kids, Botticelli's Venus is just a buck-naked woman


Examiner Opinion Zone
How do bureaucracies work?

One respectable answer is that they don't. Many an op-ed has been written to elaborate the point, but this won't be one of them. Such answer is neither useful nor reassuring...

—Jason Kuznicki

Communist Monarchies

Outside of the Arabian Peninsula, where in the world do you think absolute monarchies still exist? A strong clue is given in this Daily Telegraph story about the fate of the...

—P.J. Gladnick

A different path to regime change in Iran

“The republic has no need of science or of chemistry.” With these words, a French tribunal confirmed its 1794 sentence of death on Antoine Lavoisier, the great...

—Neil Hrab

More Examiner Opinion Zone posts...

To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines
  1. Chris Matthews' daughter tackles the deficit
  2. WaPo buries Dem fundraiser’s fraud, highlights GOP fundraising scandal
  3. To historians, Obama pledged to ’speak less often’ in future
  4. It’s not just Rangel — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., to be tried on ethics charges
  5. Hapless SEC can now hide its secrets
  6. Obama unemployment news conference featured Va. woman convicted of drug fraud
  7. NYT: ‘No more disputing’ economic recovery has slowed down, jobs outlook ‘discouraging’
  8. Growing ‘independent’ nature of electorate is helping GOP
  9. Top GOP campaign donors charged with $550 million fraud
  10. Obama’s auto policy: All in the Democratic family





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words. Comments that advocate violence, racism, or libel as well as comments written in ALL CAPS are not permitted.


blog comments powered by Disqus

RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Intern | Video | Maps | Mobile | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Rack Locations | Advertise