Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Society of Environmental Homers protect Gore UPDATED

By: Mark Tapscott
Editorial Page Editor

It's been years since former Vice President Al Gore took questions from journalsts willing to ask challenging and probing questions about either alleged flaws in the evidence for his global warming views or details of his financial interests in the adoption of government policies based on those views.

But for at least one question at the annual conference of the Society of Environmental Journalists (SEJ), Gore was presented with an opportunity to address his critics and defend his views. Unfortunately, as this video of the encounter shows, not only did Gore do what politicians usually do - evade the question - but his SEJ buddies made sure there would be no followup questions by turning off the microphone and forcing the questioner to leave.

In doing so, the SEJers demonstrated that they are the environmental beat's equivalent of sports reporters who never say anything critical of the home team. That's why they are referred to by real sports journalists as "homers." The home team for SEJ is the environmental movement and its friends and allies in government who can do no wrong.

Nobody should be surprised by the wilingness of SEJ officials to protect Gore from having to respond to critical questions from somebody who doesn't share the Gore view that man-made causes are responsible for global warming and threaten apocalypse. That these folks are true believers who are apparently incapable or unwilling to think or report critically about environmental issues is evident from the issues and speakers on their conference agenda.

Consider for example this one on the relationship of population and global warming:

 

"6.8 Billion Reasons to Ask: Population, Pollution and Human Health
It probably goes without saying that we cannot effectively resolve environmental problems without addressing their root causes. However, while global warming, water shortages, the extinction crisis, and global toxification are in the news regularly, they are seldom tied to what scientists generally consider the root causes, that is, human population, lifestyles and consumption. Discussing overpopulation is generally considered taboo, and thus ignored in most mainstream media. Panelists will discuss why they believe this must change in quick order, so that society can actually begin addressing these root causes. Coverage.
Moderator: Peter Seidel, Author, 2045: A Story of Our Future
Speakers:
Paul Ehrlich, President, Center for Conservation Biology and Bing Professor of Population Studies, Stanford University
William Ryerson, President, Population Media Center
Tim Wheeler, Reporter, The Baltimore Sun
Room: Senate Room B"

Notice the panel includes only speakers who accept the idea that human causes explain global warming (and a host of other alleged and real ills in the world).  Paul Ehrlich has been peddling Malthusian population alarmism for decades - he founded Zero Population Growth (ZPG) in 1968, the year he also published his best-selling book "The Population Bomb."

William Ryerson is an Ehrlich disciple, having served as founder and president of the Yale chapter of ZPG while a student, and then making a career of advocacy on behalf of population limitation. He is presently head of the Population Media Center, which produces anti-population growth propaganda.

Tim Wheeler of the Baltimore Sun provides the Ehrlich-Ryerson panel with a patina of journalistic credibility. The EPA, Maryland Department of the Environment and the non-profit environmental activist community have nothing to fear from his reporting unless they happen not to advance their shared agenda fast enough. He is a past SEJ president and is presently on its board of directors.

And did you catch the point of this panel? We humans cause "global warming, water shortages, the extinction crisis and global toxification."  If you truly believe the presence of too many people risks global apocalypse, is there any government action you wouldn't support, even if it meant depriving some of their liberty, property or life?

I looked up and down the SEJ conference agenda for critics of global warming and other elements of the environmental movement's conventional wisdom and found exactly one, Dan Miller of the Heartland Institute. Perhaps there were others that I missed, but at a minimum it is fair to say the program was overwhelmingly biased against independent thinking and reporting.

And these "journalists" wonder why their profession ranks right down there with used car salemen and congressmen in public  esteem?

UPDATE: And Sensenbrenner makes two!

Just found another critic of the environmentalist conventional wisdom on the SEJ conference agenda, Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, R-WI, who was slated to speak at an early morning session. Sensenbrenner is the Ranking Minority Member of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming.

If anybody else can point me to such critics on the agenda that I missed, I will gladly add them to this post.

UPDATE II: Ehrlich and his critics assess the bomb

MasterResources.org's blog has a superb post by Prof. Pierre Desroachers of the University of Toronto that brings together links to a diverse group of supporters and critics of the Ehrlich thesis, including Ehrlich and his wife Anne, published in the Electronic Journal of Sustainable Develoment. See especially the Randall O'Toole essay on Population Growth and Cities.

UPDATE III: Wheeler gives his side of the Gore Q/A

Thanks to the reader in the comment below for pointing to Tim Wheeler's defense of his actions in cutting off the microphone of Gore questioner Phelim McAleer. I leave it to readers to judge whether Wheeler acted properly or was too eager to silence McAleer.   




beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

ggordon

Oct 12, 2009


The whole notion of "global warming" and "climate change" is going down the drain. Of course they are going to protect their "golden boy". Gore goes down, they all go down.
Even the BBC is asking what ever happened to global warming - going on to explain what most have been saying for years. It is not man - it is normal. And oh... it hasn't been warming for almost 10 years as CO levels have continued to climb. Huh... no connection there either.
HELLO CONGRESS= it's all a big money grab!!

 

BornFreeAmerican

Oct 12, 2009

Yeah, and during the Carter years, it was the coming Ice Age!!

 

Oct 12, 2009

Oh, ye of little faith. Next you will be questioning Obama's Nobel Prize and his coming nomination for the Academy Award's Best Actor.

 

JustForTheRecord

Oct 12, 2009

I fully support Obama's forthcoming Academy Awards as Best Actor in a Leading Role, Best Actor in a Supporting Role, Best Film Editing, Best Sound Mixing, Best Visual Effects, Best Makeup, Best Costume Design, Best Writing and Best Animated Feature Film.

 

Dan Miller, Heartland Institute

Oct 12, 2009

re: >>I looked up and down the SEJ conference agenda for critics of global warming and other elements of the environmental movement's conventional wisdom and found exactly one, Dan Miller of the Heartland Institute.... And these "journalists" wonder why their profession ranks right down there with used car salemen and congressmen in public esteem?<<<<

During my panel discussion on "green jobs," brought up your point about credibility, noting that a new Gallup poll that noted only 10 percent of Americans have a "great deal" of trust in the media, and 20 percent have no confidence in the media at all. I suggested that the results reflected the mainstream media's tendency to rely on the same alarmist sources, and I urged them to try someone different once in a while.

No one asked me for suggestions...

Dan

 

http://owlandbear.com

Oct 12, 2009

You can be as sarcastic as you want about whether humans cause global warming, but that we cause "water shortages, the extinction crisis and global toxification" is undeniable.

These serious environmental human rights issues shouldn't be lumped in with your skepticism about climate change.

Additionally, it's ridiculous to say that that clean water and clean air regulations are really only back doors for the government to kill people and take land. It does a great injustice to serious conservative thinkers and is an insult to the intelligence of your readership.

 

Brian Angliss

Oct 12, 2009

Tim Wheeler, former SEJ president and a journalist with impeccable credentials, was the person responsible for turning off McAleer's mic - because he'd asked his followup, was hogging the mic, and neither he nor Gore were adding anything new to the discussion. See Wheeler's post on this exact exchange at the unofficial SEJ2009 conference blog: http://sej2009.sej.org/2009/10/polar-bears-censorship.html

 

glenny

Oct 12, 2009

Obammy just won the Super Bowl ! ; )

 

Wendy Redal

Oct 12, 2009

I attended SEJ, and there were a # of speakers outside 'conventional environmental wisdom' on the panels. A couple you didn't notice include including James Rogers, Chairman & CEO of Duke Energy, and Jeff Holmstead, pro-coal strategic communicator for Bracewell & Giulani.

 

Mark Tapscott

Oct 12, 2009

No, Wendy, Rogers is an advocate for global solutions to climate change. As for Holmstead, here's what he said about climate change while serving in the Bush administration: "At the practical level, there's a substantial amount of consensus around the world regarding climate change. U.S. measures are on par with and in some important instances go beyond what other countries are doing to advance the science, to develop and deploy new technologies for the long-term, and to slow the growth of greenhouse gas emissions in the near-term." Not the words of somebody who rejects the fundamental assumptions about global warming.

Got any more "critics" from the program for us?

 

Oct 12, 2009

So you silenced the only critic of Gore's self-serving AGW schtick who has been able to ask him a pointed question about his grossly inaccurate AGW propaganda piece in a public forum in recent memory. (Gore's "people" make sure he is never exposed to such challenges, apparently knowing well he cannot answer without lying.)

You facilitated Gore's disingenuous dodging, and your vindication is that the rules were designed to make sure the speaker would never have to answer an inconvenient question. Just dodge once, and the liar is home free.

You and the rest of the AGW true believers have once again shown yourselves to be utterly devoid of scientific integrity and personal honesty. Bravo. I hope you are so very proud of yourself.

 

ggordon

Oct 13, 2009


We are a Duke Energy customer - living in Indiana. Our electric rates would more than double if cap and trade passes.
Why would Rodgers support this?? It's all in the deal... they get credits for almost nothing, then charge their customers as if they had to purchase them. OH, then they become traders in carbon credits - reaping billions in revenue. Rodgers is disingenuous at best, and clearly an opportunist, robbing from his customers/consumers.

 

TheGreenMiles

Oct 13, 2009

I hear the Washington Examiner was one of the few "media" outlets to attend last Friday's Big Oil-funded global warming denial event on Capitol Hill. Careful about throwing around the accusation of "homer," Mr. Tapscott. Someone could easily say the Examiner is a "homer" for Big Oil.

 

Forest Green

Oct 13, 2009

So... pretty easy to toss peanuts at Al Gore. Care to debate an actual climate scientist on the issue, or do you think this is a debate that should be decided between political jibber-jabbers?

 

Forest Green

Oct 13, 2009

Mr. Tapscott, your response to Wnedy suggests that you are only interested in flat-worlders. Congratulations. How about some EDUCATED critics, instead of ideological pawns? This goes for the AGW supporters, as well. As I stated, I don't care what Al Gore thinks.

 

Steve K.

Oct 28, 2009

For 8 years I was in agreement with Democrats that Bush was spending too much. For 8 freaking years. Now, Obama is spending too much and even spending more than Bush and the Democrats are singing a different tune now. Why was it wasteful under Bush but OK now? Democrats and Obama are the biggest jokes ever perpetrated on America.
_____________
buy phentermine

 

iscount Christian Louboutin Sandals

Dec 5, 2009

replica watch
A.Lange &amp; Sohne watches
Rolex Air-King watches
DeWitt watch for sale
Tag Heuer watch for sale
breitling swiss replica watches

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story