Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

The Washington Post doubles down on its arrogance

By: Mark Hemingway
Commentary Staff Writer
11/04/09 12:13 PM EST

After Bob McDonnell's drubbing of Democrat Creigh Deeds, The Washington Post should be humbled considering the paper waged what can only be seen as a politically motivated crusade to make the race about social issues discussed in McDonnell's decades-old college thesis.

This was clearly a side issue compared to the economic issues the McDonnell campaign was emphasizing. In fact, earlier today I wrote, "With McDonnell's resounding win tonight, perhaps the Post will think twice about putting its credibility on the line before making itself the opposition research arm of Virginia Democrats. But don't bet on it."

Don't bet on it? Even my cynical view of the paper's political motivations didn't prepare me for the fact that the Post would try and arrogantly spin a humiliating episode. On the front page of Washingtonpost.com today's editorial is headlined:

Prove us wrong, Bob McDonnell

The editorial in the print edition is more sensibly headlined, "Mr. McDonnell's Victory: Lessons from a big win," but the editorial itself is a clinic in journalistic hubris. After some backhanded compliments of McDonnell and an attempt to save face by acknowledging that Deeds' campaign was flaming-dirigible bad, the Post finally admists "We'd be delighted if he [McDonnell] proves us wrong." Perhaps what they meant to write is "We'd be delighted if he proves the overwhelming majority of Virginia voters right and the narrow-minded powers that be at The Washington Post wrong." 

But the Post is just getting warmed up. After that telling admission, the Post concludes the editorial with two lengthy paragraphs -- I'm not making this up -- lamenting McDonnell's victory "will reinforce the conventional wisdom that it is impossible to win an election in Virginia, and elsewhere, on a platform that includes higher taxes." As proof of this rather idiosyncratic take on the election, the Post writes "It's worth noting that Mr. McDonnell's margin of victory in Northern Virginia, where traffic is worst and transportation is the dominant issue, was slimmer than it was statewide." 

Of course, McDonnell still won most of Nothern Virginia, which is always more liberal than the rest of the state and not just on transportation issues. Further, McDonnell won a number of key suburban and exurban counties in Nothern Virginia that voted for Obama last fall. What's really worth noting is that the Post is engaged in rhetorical prestidigitation here, so no wonder they don't bother trying to quantify or offer specifics regarding McDonnell's showing in Northern Virginia. Otherwise, their observation about raising taxes won't stand up -- and they know it.




beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...

Clearly it's just a joke, but a bad joke. Washington Post writer Monica Hesse writes of the irresistible nature of the Twilight book series about vampires written primarily for...


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Cause the examiner didn't do the same thing

Nov 4, 2009

when Obama won the election, after endorsing John McCain. Yes, the Examiner didn't try to pullout of a credibility tail-spin after the Obama win. And the Examiner was never "politically motivated" when it endorsed McCain. No, not at all. Pot, meet kettle.

 

kctaz

Nov 4, 2009

Endorsing a candidate if a far cry from what the Post did do to McDonnell and its idiocy in interpreting the results.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Graphic surveys NFL players concerning concussions

NFL union pans commissioner's call for players to report on teammates' possible concussions

The NFL Players Association opposes commissioner Roger Goodell's call for players to tell their teams' medical staffs if they think a teammate shows symptoms of a concussion, saying that is not an adequate solution. Full story

Economy

NC state treasurer issues gift ban for employees, limits on soliciting for charity

State Treasurer Janet Cowell unveiled new rules Friday banning employees from taking gifts from companies that do substantial business with the agency and setting a limit on charitable solicitations. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story