Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Trial lawyers seek return on contributions to Senate Democrats

By: David Freddoso and Kevin Mooney
Washington Examiner
08/14/09 12:20 AM EDT

In February, just two months before he became a Democrat, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania made a passionate plea for a special tax break for plaintiffs' trial lawyers. His bill, S 437, would allow trial lawyers to deduct immediately on their taxes up-front expenses they incur when investing in contingency lawsuits.

The tax break is reportedly worth $1.6 billion to trial lawyers. If Specter’s amendment passes, this single provision would more than repay the legal industry for its roughly $762 million in political contributions to Democrats over the last two decades.

Which would, in turn, mean more money could be recycled and funneled back to Democrats.

An Examiner analysis of the 15 firms on the National Law Journal's "2008 Plaintiff's Hot List" shows that for 2009, their employees have contributed $636,305 to federal politicians and PACs. Only $4,875 of that amount has gone to Republicans, meaning that the nation's top trial lawyers are giving more than 99 percent Democratic this year. The PAC for the American Association of Justice, the top trial lawyer lobbying group, has been marginally more balanced, giving Democrats a mere 96 percent of its $627,000 in contributions.

These trial lawyers are especially concentrating on the Senate. Members of those same 15 firms have given $236,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee this year. And trial lawyers know that the Senate is controlled by one of their own -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who faces a potentially difficult re-election. Reid has taken in some $54,000 from the top 15 firms. According to OpenSecrets, he has taken $978,000 from the legal industry as a whole.

Specter, a trial-lawyer-turned-prosecutor-turned-Senator, is the eighth most popular senator among the legal lobby, taking $309,000 from the industry so far this year.

Trial lawyers' generosity toward favored Democrats in 2009 comes on the heels of a difficult 2008 for members of the profession. Four senior partners of Milberg Weiss, the infamous New York firm that for years filed the most class-action lawsuits, pleaded guilty and received federal prison sentences and/or fines after admitting guilt in a conspiracy to pay nearly $12 million in bribes to plaintiffs in hundreds of such suits, beginning in 1979. The suits generated an estimated $250 million in attorneys' fees for the firm.

(Milberg employees have made $36,537 in political contributions this year, with every penny going to Democrats -- $3,048 to Reid and $30,389 to the DSCC.)

Also last year, Mississippi trial lawyer Richard “Dickie” Scruggs confessed to offering a $50,000 bribe to a state judge and was sentenced to a five-year prison sentence. Scruggs became famous for his work that led to the 1998 Master Tobacco Settlement that netted 52 plaintiffs trial lawyer firms more than $1.2 billion in fees.

And former Sen. John Edwards, who before being elected made a fortune suing doctors, admitted in August of 2008 to having an affair with a female campaign contractor during his  run for president. Federal investigators are now probing a $100,000 payment by the Edwards campaign to the woman.

Editor's note: This post has been changed to reflect the correct timing of John Edwards' admission of his affair.



 




beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

Where is your stimulus money going? In Baker City, Ore., the Bureau of Land Management is putting $256,000 of it toward "rattlesnake stewardship." It's the latest...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Truthdetector

Aug 14, 2009

Edwards didn't drop out of the Presidential race after admitting an affair with a female campaign contractor. It's funny how the trial lawyer haters slip in lies. Here's another lie...tort reform passed in many states...malpractice suits decreased significantly...see a drop in anyone's insurance premiums?

 

Ravi, NY

Aug 14, 2009

This is the true disgrace. Thanks to Examiner for exposing this. Will the MSM pick this up?

 

Rick

Aug 14, 2009

"see a drop in anyone's insurance premiums?"

YES!

 

Ben, NY

Aug 14, 2009

How is this a "windfall" to trial lawyers? Every business in America deducts its ordinary business expenses in the year they are incurred; contingency lawyers cannot deduct case expenses until they either collect a fee (when they win)or write them off (when they lose), based upon the fiction that the lawyers are "lending" funds to a case. There are plenty of bad eggs in the plaintiffs' bar, but this is a stupid rule. Unfairly taxing a group because it contains some bad eggs is not sound policy, whether the targets are investment bankers or plaintiffs' lawyers. Any group so affected would naturally try to change the law. Oh yeah, Dickie Scruggs tried to bribe a judge. What a non sequitur. Are you trying to be the conservative Keith Olbermann?

 

Barry Sotero

Aug 14, 2009

I think its wonderful to see the nation's greatest ongoing criminal enterprise, the legal profession, get nervous when people call them out on their ability to create their own work by controlling the political process and laws by having some 70% of congress among their members. Very few laws ever pass Congress that don't create ever more opportunities to sue your fellow deep pocketed Americans for whatever frivolous reason. You people are slowly but surely undermining the nation.

 

Rick Caird

Aug 14, 2009

Ben offers us a specious argument. The trial lawyers are making an investment, much like investing in the stock market or buying options. The gain or loss on those is not determined until the investment is closed. So is it with trial lawyers.

I would like to take a tax deduction on a losing investment, while still holding the investment, too.

Rick

 

Andrew J. Barovick

Aug 14, 2009

Nice job of marshalling negative stories about trial lawyers, but what's your point, other than revealing your own political leanings (against them, clearly)? Yes, many lawyers connected to Milberg Weiss are criminal, and Richard Scruggs is as bad as any of them. Yes, John Edwards had an affair. Yes, there are former trial lawyers now in politics. And yes, believe it or not, many people like to advance their own interests in Washington, DC. Fellows, there are criminal and adulterers in every profession, and every walk of life. You want to point the "trial lawyers" that are guilty of it, be my guest. But it's not news. It's propaganda. As for the "tax break," what you conveniently neglected to mention is that it has had BIPARTISAN support all along, and is therefore not a result of some insidious cabal of Democrats and "trial lawyers." Get your facts straight, ease up on your sucking up to the Right, and then you may be taken more seriously.

 

Ben, NY

Aug 14, 2009

Nice try Rick. If the trial lawyers paid capital gains tax on their "investment," your argument might not be so silly. But they don't; their investment is treated as ordinary income. I'd take your racket if I had the choice.

 

Lanier Y Chapman

Aug 14, 2009

What's the issue here? In a market economy, votes are just like any other goods and services. They should be bought and sold, so that they go to the parties that value them most. If teachers unions, defense contractors, trial lawyers, or farmers pay to play, so what? An honest politician is one who when bought, stays bought.

 

Fed up victim of Frivolous Lawsuit Industry

Aug 14, 2009

As a defendant in Wilson County Kansas Frivolous Lawsuit Case #2006-CV-25 (now Kansas Appellate Court Case #102665) at the hands of a serial litigant, professional plaintiff with a documented alias, an arson, perjury and sexual assault on a child history and numerous other "entries" on his Colorado Court Records, I'm furious over this tax break for the lawyers. Thus far this case has cost we defendants over $60,000.00 in attorney fees and we can NOT take a tax deduction on one penny! To find out how and why the lawyers are getting away with that and a lot of other legal and political skullduggery go to www.halt.org and check out "Reform Projects" Check out the 50 state Attorney "Discipline" Report Cards and "Judicial Accountablity" Report Cards. Take special note of the "F's" that most states (including Kansas) get for "Gift Restrictions" on judges.

At War With All Lawyers and their complicit black robed bureaucrat "charade conductors" ilf@centurytel.net

 

Steve

Aug 15, 2009

Lets see....so we have legalized extortion by the trial lawyers and now it is tax free?? Who is running this country anyway? This is an OUTRAGE! The founding fathers would be rolling over in their graves. When are we going to stop supporting public candidates that accept contributions from organized crime masquerading as trial lawyers!

 

Rick Caird

Aug 15, 2009

Sorry Ben. You are still wrong.

Are you unaware that short term losses are treated the same wa?. It is not until they are closed that the gains or losses are totaled. You might also look into investments in things like gold or silver. Those investments are never taxed as capital gains or losses no matter what the holding period is. They are always treated as short term gains.

Rick

 

Rick Caird

Aug 15, 2009

I should also add, Ben, that the reason we have such a thing as capital gains is to get people to invest. Do you really think we want to reward lawyers for investing in more lawsuits?

Rick

 

Aug 15, 2009

Rick: I am not a tax lawyer, but last time I checked, short term gains and losses, because they are short term, tend to offset each other during the same year. This is particularly so, because investors, unlike lawyers, can plan their investments and time their purchases and sales for their own tax benefit. So, that argument is hardly persuasive, even if I buy your concept of investment. As for gold and silver, as Johnny Carson used to say, I did not know that. I would be interested in the reason. As to your final question, you should reward lawyers for actually litigating cases. In the area of securities litigation, with which I am familiar the system is skewed to provide no reward for a lawyer who actually tries to do his job; it rewards the lawyer who makes a quick and cheap settlement.

 

depaz

Sep 18, 2009

I love how the CEOs of big business get beat up so severely about their obscene bonuses, but no one ever mentions the hundreds of millions trial lawyers take in on their class action suits. . . .

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

FAI Chief Executive John Delaney speaks during a press conference at the Football Association of Ireland  headquarters in Abbottstown, Dublin  Thursday Nov. 19, 2009. Ireland failed to qualify  for th...

Ireland gives up hope of getting World Cup replay with France over Thierry Henry's hand ball

Ireland has given up hope of a World Cup playoff replay against France because of Thierry Henry's hand ball. Full story

Politics

Democrats snare 60 votes to move forward on health care; Landrieu, Lincoln to vote 'yes'

Democratic leaders secured the last two votes to move ahead on historic health care legislation, clearing the way for a Saturday night showdown on President Barack Obama's top domestic initiative. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story