Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Unions want to turn Hyatt into a roach motel

By: J.P. Freire
Associate Commentary Editor
10/05/09 12:38 PM EDT

Once you check in, you can never check out. At least that's the goal of Unite Here, which is protesting Hyatt hotels nationwide in response to the company's decision to hire cheaper labor. In Boston, for instance, three Boston area hotels fired 98 staff (some of whom earned more than $15 an hour) on Aug. 31 and replaced them with $8-an-hour employees of Georgia-based Hospitality Staffing Solutions.

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick went so far as to threaten a state-employee boycott of the chain in response. In Long Beach, Calif., Unite Here Local 11 is holding protests to get the hotel to sign a neutrality agreement. But such an agreement is anything but, given that the hotel wouldn't be able to request a proper democratic secret-ballot process.

This is a bad time to expect job stability from the hotel industry. Occupancy rates nationwide have been hovering below 60% this summer, the lowest since the immediate post-Sept. 11 period. Revenue per room has dropped by 20%, the steepest in 22 years.

While such shortfalls mean that hotels need to slim down, the political implications are myriad. On Friday, the Providence, R.I. City Council unanimously approved an ordinance requiring the Dunkin' Donuts Center, Rhode Island Convention Center, Veterans Memorial Auditorium, and three hotels to retain employees for up to six months following a change in management.

Unite Here cheered the bill. Carmen Castillo, a housekeeper at the Westin, said: "We're going to keep fighting and we're not going to let what happened in Boston happen here."

But city revenue from the hotel tax has dropped nearly 11 percent from July 2008 to July 2009. But drawing blood from a stone seems reasonable to councilman Michael Solomon: "We're not going to put the hotels out of business. All we're talking about is six months."

It's not like hotels want to lay these people off for kicks. It's merely to ensure the survival of the business. But to unions, businesses exist merely to provide the maximum number of jobs possible, rather than meet consumer demand. It's just that kind of logic which will sink the hotel industry.




beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

Where is your stimulus money going? In Baker City, Ore., the Bureau of Land Management is putting $256,000 of it toward "rattlesnake stewardship." It's the latest...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Darren

Oct 5, 2009

Just because the hotel finds cheaper labor doesn't mean it will cost less to stay at the hotel. Any larger profit will be retained by the hotel and the savings will not be passed along to the consumer.

 

dan

Oct 5, 2009

all you liberal idiots always claiming profits on companys, hey darren its called free market, and you stupid unions shut up, we don,t want unions they are not needed, they put more people out of work, all unions are mob run, this is 2009 not 1968, liberals and unions stay out of our lives

 

Oct 5, 2009

I get disgusted with liberals like Darren. You have to have no idea what you are talking about to make statements like he does. Here is a chart through September 2009 of RevPAR (Revenue per available room):

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_pMscxxELHEg/Sqp5_HZliAI/AAAAAAAAGVU/zl1vmbrSFG0/s1600-h/HotelOccupancySep11.jpg

Now, if Darren were to actually look at the chart, he would wonder how these hotels are even staying in business, not why they are trying to cut costs.

Rick

 

Guy Jones

Oct 6, 2009

@Darren

You miss the entire point of the article. First off, there is no guarantee that the cheaper labor will translate into a profit. It does, however, help move towards that goal in a tough economic climate. Secondly, this is about an industry surviving in tough times, not the benefit to the consumer. What the hotels do with the money saved on lower labor costs is up to them. If they want to pass it on to the consumer, or help cut a loss, that's their decision. The free market will decide.

 

Peter

Oct 7, 2009

Classical free market principles governing labor rates no longer promote national economic progress. Once labor pools were local or at most regional. In downturns, wages would go down. When recessions ease, demand for labor eventually increases and there is the possibility of wage increases and all benefit. But with a globalized labor market due to illegal immigration and a foolish H1B visa program, free market forces will drive wages ever lower, destroying consumer buing power and creating a growing 19th Century-style permanent impoverished underclass with all the crime and social degradation that brings. Markets, yes! but create the conditions where they function to possibly benefit of all Americans. Smug upper-middle class types may soon find themselves training their own low-wage replacements. Business owners will find a populace unable to buy their products and services at a price that makes a profit. Do we really want a race to the bottom?

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Economy

Investors seeking Stanford assets urge Antiguan court to remove British firm as liquidator

A group of investors is urging an Antiguan court to remove a British accounting firm appointed to collect assets of a Caribbean offshore bank at the center of an alleged Ponzi scheme by Texas financier R. Allen Stanford. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story