Opinion

[Print]  [Email]        

Who's really reading the McChrystal report?

By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent
10/23/09 6:25 PM EDT

Forget about reading legislation, how about a top general's report on Afghanistan?

Gen. Stanley McChrystal's classified report on the war in Afghanistan supposedly includes his determination that as many as a half-million U.S. troops will be needed to complete the mission there over a five year period.

But most lawmakers probably haven't seen that startling figure, or the rest of the classified report for that matter, because few seem to lining up to read it -- despite the fact that it has been available for weeks.

Senate and House aides have declined to disclose the list of which lawmakers have signed in to read McChrystal's assessment and they would not even provide a number. Because it is classified, only lawmakers can read it and they must sign in to a secret room to view it.

House Armed Services Committee spokesperson Laura Battles told that the number of lawmakers who have read the material is also classified information.

A tipster told us that few Senators and House members have taken an interest in the 64 page report, and an informal survey seems to back that up. I did my own semi-random sampling of a dozen members. Just one - House Intelligence Committee ranking member Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich., had read it.

Leadership aides point out that most of the document had already been leaked to the Washington Post, which posted a redacted version on the Internet. But the classified report includes six additional pages, plus material that was redacted from the leaked version, including the 500,000 troop figure initially reported by NBC's Andrea Mitchell.

"I can't remember whether I read the classified or the declassified report. I can't remember," said Ike Skelton, D-Mo., Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

Rep. Howard McKeon, R-Calif., defended the lack of interest and said most members have gotten the information in other ways. For instance, McKeon said, he has not read the full report, but his staff has read it and he has spoken personally to McChrystal, who is commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

But McKeon is ranking member on the Armed Services Committee and has access to military brass that most lawmakers do not.
Many had no idea the report was even available.

"I'm worried about health care," said Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., "I actually didn't even know it was out there."

Aides point out that many members attended a classified briefing on Afghanistan in September that included McChrystal's assessment.

But there is still a responsibility to read the report. argued Hoekstra, who said he was the first in "line" to read it.

"If we get a classified report up here, I believe it is my responsibility to read it."
 




beltway confidential

Call it what you like -- it deserves a complete investigation. (afp) Any reporter worth their salt knows that when government decides to investigate itself, exonerations tend...

So let me get this straight, the government created the housing market crash by insuring a lot of really expensive, little-to-no money down mortgages for people that couldn't...

Although the Department of Justice is not yet investigating the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), its Inspector General has looked into whether...

Clearly it's just a joke, but a bad joke. Washington Post writer Monica Hesse writes of the irresistible nature of the Twilight book series about vampires written primarily for...


To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

ggordon

Oct 23, 2009

"...I'm worried about healthcare. I didn't even know it was out there".
That pretty much sums it up. The Dems are more worried about how to scre* the American public by nationalizing healthcare, than they are about our military who are adrift and in need of many more forces to win. WIN - it's the goal, remember? No, let's take several weeks to act like we are being verrryyy presidential and then make the wrong decision - go middle of the road - make everyone mad, and further endanger the mission.

 

ladybug

Oct 23, 2009

What a disconnect, when the public wants more attention on the economy/jobs and Afghanistan, the Congress and President are focused on disrupting our health system in search of a public option.

We need to keep this in mind in for the 2010 and 2012 elections.

 

bokoo143

Oct 23, 2009

Here is the problem,our troops are dying every day and these useless eaters are ignoring them so Obamo will kiss them on their heads...I see unemployement in their futures.

 

www.geekmom.net

Oct 23, 2009

"I'm worried about healthcare"? what a jerk. i hope they kick your leftist butt out of office.

 

RobbyS

Oct 24, 2009

Both administrations make the mistake of trying to put the war on the backburner. In 2005, Bush devoted himself to social security reform rather than to winning the war. Obama is now making a similar mistake of looking for a big domestic win instead of handling the crises facing him. Bush had the excuse of thinking that Iraq was under control, although he should have know better. Obama has no excuses.

 

djmelfi

Oct 24, 2009

These politicians go to Washington for the grease, their staff does all the work and they wait for someone to tell them how to vote, or how they make the most MONEY voting.

I am sick of ALL OF IT!!!

 

tiredofit

Oct 24, 2009

ODD that when Republicans had control all we heard from Dems was how our troops needs were not being met by the Bush administration. How our borders needed to be secured and then there are the "famous" unsecure containers that enter our country via. Has anyone heard even one mention of those unsecured containers since the Dems took over? Was that all just fear mongering by the Dems with smoke and mirrors or are they still something to be concerned about because the Dems have dropped the ball? Either send in more troops to keep the troops that are there now safer or get them all out at the same time.

 

Don

Oct 24, 2009

The situation in Congress is totally out of control. These self serving lunatics are spending far too much time spinning words and doing dirty tricks trying to force obamacrap down our throats.
They must not care that people are losing jobs by the hundreds of thousands.
Our troops deserve to be taken out of the congressional world of "All for me politics" and be given whatever they need to win. Period

I wonder how "our representatives" can sleep at night knowing that troops are dying because of politics.
And, how can they STEAL money from the troops for personal PORK projects that are just to get VOTES.
These are sick puppies!

 

ron nord

Oct 24, 2009

Hey its only a "Top Secret" report maybe the New York Times will post it and we can get a look at what President Zero is hiding from.

 

junglejim123

Oct 24, 2009

Maybe we can form a third party that actually DOES GIVE a flying fig about Americans !!! The French had the right idea when the invented the guillotine.

 

Shanghaied

Oct 25, 2009

Time to resign for McC.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Houston Rockets coach Rick Adelman, center, reacts with his staff Jack Sikma, left, and Elston Turner, right, to a called foul against his team as they play the Atlanta Hawks during the third quarter ...

Tracy McGrady says he's ready to play, Rockets believe it's still too soon after knee surgery

Tracy McGrady is eager to play. The Houston Rockets say he'll have to wait. Full story

World

Russian president scolds ruling party over regional elections, says acted undemocratically

Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev on Saturday sharply criticized officials in the ruling Kremlin-backed party for using its clout and undermining democracy in recent regional votes, saying it must learn to win fairly. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story