Washington Examiner  home delivery | classifieds | autos | jobs | real estate | home listings | advertise
   
Passport to the Podium
View today's E-Dition

Sunday, August 1, 2010 | Last Update 4:34 EDT
click for forecast
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Classified Cars Homes Rentals Remodel
Nation World Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays Opinion Zone Capital Land Weather Mobile Site RSS Feeds Contact
Nation World Science Education Video Technology
Beltway Confidential Yeas & Nays White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York Chris Stirewalt
Capital Land DC Virginia Maryland Local Opinion Zone Crime Transportation People Education Real Estate
Editorials Beltway Confidential OpinionZone Nate Beeler Columnists Mark Tapscott Dave Freddoso Mark Hemingway
Your Money Real Estate Technology K-Street
Cheers & Jeers Redskins/NFL Wizards/NBA Caps/NHL Nationals/MLB United/MLS Colleges Golf
Yeas & Nays Art Movies Television Health Food Music Scoop Theater Wheels Video Events Calendar
Jobs Buy Stuff Post Free Ad Personals Events
Automotive News New Used Certified Pre-Owned
Real Estate News Rent a Home Buy a Home Home Makeover

Opinion
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

Who's responsible for the Senate's middle-of-the-night vote?

By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
12/21/09 1:19 AM EST

Why did the Senate gather at 1 a.m. Monday for a vote to move ahead on the Reid Amendment to the Democrats' national health care bill? Democrats blame Republicans. "Everyone knows we're here at one in the morning because of my friends on the other side of the aisle," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said moments before the vote. On CBS Sunday, Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu said, "We don't have to vote in the middle of the night, but [Republican Sen. Tom Coburn] is the one making us do it -- not Harry Reid, not the Democrats. It is a Republican obstructionist that is making us vote in the middle of the night."

Coburn has no doubt slowed debate on the bill. But the fact is, there is no reason the Reid Amendment vote could not have been held at a more reasonable hour. One a.m. Monday was the earliest moment that Senate rules allowed a vote, but there is no rule keeping the Senate from voting at some time after 1 a.m. If Reid had scheduled the vote for, say, 11 a.m. Monday, that would have been fine. If he scheduled it for 4 p.m. Monday, or 10 a.m. Tuesday, that would have been fine, too.

But Reid is determined to pass the national health care bill by Christmas, and to do so he has to get the cloture vote on his amendment done at the earliest moment. The timeline is Reid's and Reid's alone. "The bottom line is, Sen. Reid schedules the floor," says one well-connected GOP aide. "He is the only one who can schedule the floor." If Reid had scheduled the vote during business hours on, say, Tuesday, a final vote would not have taken place until the day after Christmas -- an outcome Reid apparently found unacceptable.

This is how it works. Reid introduced his amendment Saturday morning. (It's the one that has the Sen. Ben Nelson Medicaid buy-off and other curious features.) Senate rules say there has to be an intervening day between the introduction of the amendment and a vote on limiting debate on the amendment. That intervening day was Sunday. That meant the cloture vote could be held Monday, or any time thereafter. The rules also say that the vote has to be held at least one hour after that next day has begun. So the Senate's Monday business began at 12:01 a.m., and the Reid Amendment vote could be held at 1:01 a.m. (As it happened, Reid himself spoke last, and his remarks went over the mark by six minutes.)

After the middle-of-the-night vote, there will be a maximum of 30 hours debate on the amendment. Then there will be a 30-hour period for a Republican substitute bill, followed by a 30-hour period on the final bill. Reid's schedule calls for a final, final vote on the health care measure to take place at about 7 p.m. on Christmas Eve. Voila! The bill will be passed by Christmas. That couldn't be done unless the Reid Amendment cloture vote were held in the earliest hours of Monday morning, setting off the final chain of votes and waiting periods. "This is purely to satisfy a self-imposed, arbitrary deadline," says the GOP aide.

By the way, when the 1 a.m. vote took place, the Reid Amendment had been public for about 36 hours, and the public had not had a single business day to examine it. "Make no mistake," said Minority Leader Mitch McConnell a few minutes before the vote. "If the people who wrote this bill were proud of it, they wouldn't be forcing this vote in the dead of night." Referring to the Nelson buy-off and other special arrangements in the bill, McConnell said few people would have imagined that the health care debate would have ended "with a couple of cheap deals and a rushed vote at one o'clock in the morning."

But that's what happened. In the end, to no one's surprise, the Reid Amendment moved ahead, 60-40, on a straight party-line vote. Democrats can blame Sen. Coburn and Republicans all they like, but the fact is, there is no reason, beyond the Christmas deadline, that the vote had to take place at 1 a.m.



More from Byron York

  • To historians, Obama pledged to ’speak less often’ in future
  • A battle between Left and Right -- inside the GOP
  • Obama support falls among blacks, Hispanics
  • What does it take to be a ‘hero’ of JournoList?
  • Dems fear GOP oversight of Obama administration

Topics

harry reid and health care reform


Follow The Examiner

beltway confidential
Eight congressmen now calling for Rangel to give up his seat

The Hill: The tally of House Democrats calling on Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) to resign his seat in Congress stood at eight as members adjourned for the August recess late...

—Mark Hemingway

Growing ‘independent’ nature of electorate is helping GOP

The proportion of Republicans, Democrats, and independents that turnout to vote shape the outcome of every election.  Even small shifts in these percentages can dramatically...

—Gary Andres

It’s not just Rangel — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., to be tried on ethics charges

Here’s your Friday night news dump — move over Charlie Rangel: Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) has chosen to go through an ethics trial, like the one lined up for...

—Mark Hemingway

NYT: ‘No more disputing’ economic recovery has slowed down, jobs outlook ‘discouraging’

With the dismal GDP figures that came in today, The New York Times isn’t mincing words. The outlook for jobs and economic growth is bleak: There is no more disputing it:...

—Mark Hemingway

More Beltway Confidential posts...

Capital Land, the Examiner's local news blog




Today’s Featured Writers
Bill O'Reilly
What about the things Sherrod did wrong?
Diana West
Admitting Turkey to EU means Eurabia
Diane Dimond
Time to close the door on a bad idea -- early prison release
Steve Chapman
Traditional marriage advocates capitalize on criticism
Mona Charen
Washington Post finds waste -- in government!
Michael Barone
Voters want supersized government to crash diet
Meghan Cox Gurdon
To kids, Botticelli's Venus is just a buck-naked woman


Examiner Opinion Zone
How do bureaucracies work?

One respectable answer is that they don't. Many an op-ed has been written to elaborate the point, but this won't be one of them. Such answer is neither useful nor reassuring...

—Jason Kuznicki

Communist Monarchies

Outside of the Arabian Peninsula, where in the world do you think absolute monarchies still exist? A strong clue is given in this Daily Telegraph story about the fate of the...

—P.J. Gladnick

A different path to regime change in Iran

“The republic has no need of science or of chemistry.” With these words, a French tribunal confirmed its 1794 sentence of death on Antoine Lavoisier, the great...

—Neil Hrab

More Examiner Opinion Zone posts...

To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines
  1. Chris Matthews' daughter tackles the deficit
  2. WaPo buries Dem fundraiser’s fraud, highlights GOP fundraising scandal
  3. To historians, Obama pledged to ’speak less often’ in future
  4. It’s not just Rangel — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., to be tried on ethics charges
  5. Hapless SEC can now hide its secrets
  6. Obama unemployment news conference featured Va. woman convicted of drug fraud
  7. NYT: ‘No more disputing’ economic recovery has slowed down, jobs outlook ‘discouraging’
  8. Growing ‘independent’ nature of electorate is helping GOP
  9. Top GOP campaign donors charged with $550 million fraud
  10. Obama’s auto policy: All in the Democratic family





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words. Comments that advocate violence, racism, or libel as well as comments written in ALL CAPS are not permitted.


blog comments powered by Disqus

RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Intern | Video | Maps | Mobile | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Rack Locations | Advertise