Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

An undemocratic tide in the Americas

By: Newt Gingrich
Examiner Columnist
September 25, 2009

AP PHOTO/ESTBEAN FELIX
Although Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, left, like Honduran President Manuel Zelaya, right, was democratically elected, he has subverted democracy in Venezuela to ensure his rule will be uncontested for decades.
What is the Obama administration thinking?

A close ally of Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez sits barricaded in the Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa, having been lawfully convicted of attempting a slow-motion coup in Honduras. Paid bands of his rent-a-thugs are terrorizing and looting the city.

And the Obama administration is effectively cheering them on.

It all began this summer, when Honduran President Manuel Zelaya was deposed and deported following his attempt to subvert the Honduran Constitution.

In a part of the world where strongmen -- or caudillos -- too often use democratic means to gain power but then refuse to relinquish it, the Honduran Constitution strictly prohibits changing its presidential term-limit provision.

In blatant defiance of this, early this summer Zelaya orchestrated street protests in support of a referendum to rewrite the constitution to allow him to retain power beyond the end of his term in January.

By all accounts -- including a report issued recently by the independent Congressional Research Service -- the Honduran authorities acted legally and constitutionally in ordering and carrying out the ouster of Zelaya.

Zelaya ignored repeated rulings by the Honduran Supreme Court that his actions were illegal, and was only arrested and deported after the Supreme Court (on which a majority of the justices are from Zelaya's party) ruled it necessary.

The Honduran legislature then voted overwhelmingly -- including all but three members of Zelaya's own party -- to support his ouster and install an interim president. Not a single Honduran institution, from the church to the legislature to the Honduran people's ombudsman -- the Defensor del Pueblo -- believed he deserved to remain president.

Another reason Honduran officials acted so quickly and decisively against Zelaya is his close relationship with Chavez.

Under Zelaya, Honduras had entered into an anti-American alliance with Chavez called the Bolivarian Alternative of the Americans. ALBA's reason for being is to oppose United States "hegemony" and create Latin American authoritarian governments on the model of Castro's Cuba.

Through ALBA, Chavez has created a tide of incipient dictatorship flowing out of Venezuela and into other countries in Latin America.

Although Chavez, like Zelaya, was democratically elected, he has subverted democracy in Venezuela to ensure his rule will be uncontested for decades. And one by one, each of the members of ALBA have followed Chavez's lead and changed their constitutions to remove limits on the number of terms their presidents can serve.

First Bolivia and Ecuador changed their constitutions. Then, this summer, Chavez allies Zelaya in Honduras and Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua began agitating to do the same.

The Obama administration's reaction to Honduras' attempt to stand athwart this anti-democratic tide in Latin America has been shocking and inexplicable. This summer, the administration promptly labeled the ouster of Zelaya a "coup d'etat" and insisted that he be restored to power.

The administration has since cut off aid to Honduras and threatened Honduran assets in the United States. Obama Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton even canceled the visas of Honduran Supreme Court members who are refusing to sanction Zelaya's return to power. So much for an independent judiciary.

Perhaps most inexplicable has been the Obama administration's pronouncement that it will not accept the results of the Honduran presidential election scheduled for November as long as Zelaya is denied the presidency.

There is no reason to doubt that the upcoming Honduran elections will be more honest and democratic than others the Obama administration has accepted without much complaint, such as the "elections" in Iran earlier this year.

All parties, including Zelaya's party, are participating and the candidates were selected before the current crisis began. The winner will take office when Zelaya's term would have legally and constitutionally ended in January.

The Obama administration should reverse itself and announce that it will accept the results of the November elections. If it refuses to do so, the Senate should support South Carolina Republican Sen. Jim DeMint's effort to block confirmation of President Obama's assistant secretary of state for Latin American affairs until the administration changes its mind.

Without the backing of the United States, Zelaya and his thuggish followers will be less emboldened. The elections can proceed peacefully. The rule of law can prevail in Honduras. And we can stop asking ourselves, what is the Obama administration thinking?

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich has published 19 books, including 10 fiction and nonfiction best-sellers. He is the founder of the Center for Health Transformation and chairman of American Solutions for Winning the Future. For more information, see newt.org. His exclusive column for The Examiner appears Fridays.




beltway confidential

In response to the attention we gave him for his old column on how Washington has "anemic winters" because of global warming, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tells NRO's Robert...

By a vote of 52 to 33, the Obama administration nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, just failed to get the 60 votes needed for his nomination to proceed...

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Laura L.

Sep 25, 2009

My thanks to Mr. Gingrich for stating the facts of the Honduras crisis so well. For Hondurans who consider the U.S. a friend and have supported its efforts in Central America, it is hard to comprehend if it is either that the current U.S. Ambassador in Honduras, Mr. Hugo Llorens, has done a poor job in relaying information to his government on the situation or if President Obama is indeed a socialist, as suggested by Mr. John McCain during the recent elections (something that I found funny at the time, even as a Republican).

Again, thank you for an excellent article, and my admiration for not being sold out like other media venues.

 

Larry S.

Sep 25, 2009

Thank you Newt. You are a true American.
Obama backing a Communist who is being backed by Chavez, (and paid for), has thousands of North Americans who live here, invest here and care for the peaceful people in this country is beyond comprehension. This Administration should be made to pay very large damages financially for all the harm they have done here.

 

David Ellis

Sep 25, 2009

Maybe the Honduran Supreme Court Justices should follow Colombia's lead of "Judges Without Faces," and start wearing ski masks to work. So that way, when they make a decision that Obama doesn't like, they don't have to worry about getting their US visas and Sam's Club memberships canceled.

 

Jenny B

Sep 26, 2009

I still don't understand, Obama has all these pictures of Chavez with Zelaya and still he wants this man to go back as President...the USA is the number ONE cause to all what is happening in our country. I agree the USA administration should be made to pay all the damages financially for all the harm they have done in Honduras. Since CNN and other News reporters only mention part of what really is going on, but do not mention how Zelaya calls his people to attack, destroy private properties. Mrs Clinton should be removed from her seat and retire, or giving a second position in the elsewhere.

 

Citizen1

Sep 26, 2009

Absolutely! This is exactly why our bozO-n-chief must be stopped in his tracks. He is the same mindset of Chavez and Castro. Rule with a fist and talk as a democratic leader. bho consistently says he is for hope and change, competition, free markets, the middle class, etc etc. He is lying, clear and simple. We wants an expansive underclass who responds to "him". Supports "him". ACORN is a microcosim of the way he sees America from coast to coast; and indeed, continent to continent.

 

Shane K

Sep 26, 2009

Gingrich, you know for a fact that neither Chavez nor Zelaya are dictators. This rant of yours is simply red meat filled with lies and half-truths to fuel your Republican Party's efforts to characterize anyone to the left of Richard Nixon, including Obama, as a Communist.

Unfortunately, since most people get their information from television, they don't know the truth of what is and has been going on in Latin America or in the US for that matter.

Shame on you, as a representative of the United States political elite, for spreading these lies and contradictions, and condemning the working classes of the world to virtual slavery, and exposing them to violence, intimidation and death when they try to stand up for their human rights.

You know exactly what you are doing and it is dangerous and truly undemocratic. Your party's tactics will result in blood-letting and you clearly don't even care. It is sickening.

 

trinket59

Sep 26, 2009

Dear poor Shane,
1. Chavez IS a dictator; Zelaya is (and will hopefully continue to be) a wanna-be dictator.
2. No longer do most of us get our info from tv; if we did we would agree with you.
3. Socialism creates a permanent working class/elite ruling class situation, no way to move up the socio-economic ladder. Socialism = slavery.

 

Sarch

Sep 26, 2009

Shane K, as a Honduran, living here in Honduras, I want to know where you get your information from.

I am not a fan of Mr. Gingrich, but this time he has his FACTS straight, yor need to listen to people who are here in Honduras, who watched Mr. Zalaya taking our country down and attempting to give us over to Chaves.

If you lived in Venezuela, you would not be able to say anything against Chavez, he would send in masked men and KILL you and anyone there with you. As a freedom loving person, I don't want to live that way.

So please get YOUR facts straight before sending out irrisponsible messages, saying things that's not true and that hurts millions of people, unless you are one of Zalaya's or Chaves' thugs.

 

junglejim123

Sep 26, 2009

Starving the poor in Honduras is not very democratic Obama so you an stop your pretty spoeeches about democracy. You are always comfortable in the company of radicals and thugs and being a control freak suits you. Our Congres needs to do everything to help the Honduran people because Hillar yand Obama have spit on them. This is not the way America treats our friends..at least it wasnt until that snake charmer slithered into the White House. mm mm mm Barack Hussein Obama mmm mm mm makes most of us sick to our stomachs.

 

D Chalmers

Sep 27, 2009

I saw loads of affluent, semi-educated Bolivians say exactly the same things about Morales as these people are nowsaying about Zelaya when I lived in Bolivia.They were as wrong, as injust and as morally corrupt then as you are now.
A corrupt middle class fighting to keep the poor down so they can live off their backs.
They - and you - are nothing more than that.
Chavez hasn't assassinated any Latin heads of state or toppled elected governments on the continent.The US has, numerous times.
So why do you go on and on about Chavez?

 

El Concubino

Sep 29, 2009

As a Cuban I would like to share with an old Cuban saying...
Tell me who you hang with, and I gonna tell you who you are..
So for those who does not know who is Manuel Zelaya.Maybe it will useful to know who are his friends:Fidel and Raul Castro, Hugo Chavez(Venezuela),Evo Morales(Bolivia), Daniel Ortega(Nicaragua),Correa(Ecuador) Lula da Silva(Brazil), Obama. Perhaps now you have an idea who is Mel Zelaya..

 

Curt

Sep 29, 2009

You have to question weather Obamadinejad is supporting Zalaya because he has aspirations to follow in the footsteps of those hijacking their countries in Latin America! He has repeatedly chosen the wrong side since taking office and its getting harder and harder to ignore his radical marxist philosphies. He seems to admire the totalitarian regimes rather than do what is necessary to protect the freedom of their people!

 

kris

Sep 30, 2009

Obviously the people who agree with the military response to Zalaya are not concerned by the resemblance between this situation and the many past military coups that crippled Latin America for decades.

Whatever the complaints about Zalaya, the fact is he is the democratically elected leader of the country. And since Mr.Gingrich supports this military answer to Zalaya's attempted referendum on presidential term limits, then I suppose he would have agreed to the same military solution when Ronald Regan was proposed extending the term limits on the American presidency??

Please click here for NYT article on Reagan's comments: http://www.nytimes.com/1987/11/29/us/reagan-wants-end-of-two-term-limit.html

 

Archie

Sep 30, 2009

I see no concern for the Honduran people here. This is a country that was under military rule for 25 years!

Democratic elections in Honduras began only recently in 1982. In the face of this fact, it is strange to me that anyone who is concerned about democracy in Honduras would accept the military once again exapanding its powers and curtailing those of the Honduran people.

For those who say that this is legal and not a military coup, I ask, why then is Micheletti suspending the civil rights of the citizens and using the army to detain them and restrain them. If citizens in a civil society are breaking the laws, it is the police, who first enforces the laws of the country not the army. When you place the army in opposition to the people of a country, and they are being used to arrest, detain and contain the population, this is not a situation of constitutional democracy.

 

Viv

Oct 1, 2009

Isn't it strange that the forces of democracy Mr Gigrich is supporting, have decided to supend civil rights.

 

Nick

Oct 2, 2009

While I am not surprised at the lack of understanding some of you seem to have in the area of civil rights. What happened in Honduras is a legal process designed to deal with just such a situation. When you have a situation like this, where there is a dictator being ousted, you have to deal with his "brown shirts." This guy obviously had plenty of them and they where running a muck across the country. It is completely appropriate that the military, if necessary, be employed to deal with that situation. I've found it very interesting that, given the behavior of both, the United States military is much more trustworthy and reliable than our elected officials, especially now!

 

mary

Oct 2, 2009

"where there is a dictator being ousted" You seem to have missed it: Zaleya was ELECTED into the Honduran Presidency.

Micheletti was appointed/installed.

And the "brown shirts"? Those are the Honduran people protesting for the return of their legally and democratically elected President.

And the suspension of civil rights, closure of media outlets, curfews, rounding up and arrests of citizens? That is Micheletti, the installedc president.

Hope that cleared it up for you, 'cause you don't seem to know what is going on there.

 

David Ellis

Oct 2, 2009

Mary,
Zelaya being elected isn't the point; so was Richard Nixon. But both were CONSTITUTIONALLY removed by the Congress and Supreme Court. Tell me what part of Constitutionally removed you don't understand, and I'll be happy to explain it to you.

So you're the one who doesn't seem to know what's going on there. You can't even spell Zelaya right, but you presume to pass judgment on their LEGAL internal affairs.

 

mary

Oct 3, 2009

Because the president was constitutionally removed does not make him a dictator, nor does your say so.

In fact, the chief counsel for the Honduran Military has publicly admitted that they broke their own laws when they forcibly removed Zelaya from the country, by force, at night, in his pajamas.[http://the-osterley-times.blogspot.com/2009/07/top-honduran-military-lawyer-we-broke.html]

So you can punt at my spelling all you want, the exile of Zelaya from Honduras was still ILLEGAL. And the current suspension of civil rights in Honduras is still trampling on the constitutional rights of the citizens.

 

David Ellis

Oct 3, 2009

Mary,
Yes only a fair trail could have convicted him of treason of being a wannabe dictator. But it doesn’t look like that will ever happen now.

Did you actually read what the top Honduran military lawyer said? No of course you didn’t. You only read the article title, “We broke the law.” End of discussion. So let’s vilify the victims, and glorify the villain. The lawyer’s only acknowledging that giving Zelaya amnesty by flying him out of the country was a crime. Zelaya should have gone to jail. But following the US example of political expediency as we showed in the Iran-Contra affair, they rationalized not following the letter of the law. And since they’re a small weak country, the world’s now having a field day scapegoating the victim. What’s really scary here is that this drama in Honduras reveals how many self-serving demagogue world leaders we have and how few leaders of principal.

 

bozo

Oct 4, 2009

dbhzdf dzbzdfbd

 

mary

Oct 4, 2009

I don 't understand why my posts keep disappearing.

 

mary

Oct 4, 2009

I cannot respond as I would like since my posts keep disappearing. Sorry about that.

 

Mary

Oct 4, 2009

The fact that you consider removing the President from the country at gunpoint in the middle of the night “giving him amnesty” speaks volumes about your notion of “due process”; as does your assertion that “Zelaya should have gone to jail”.“Due process” requires that a person is innocent of crimes until proven guilty. Obviously you think this step is a mere formality that can be skipped.

 

mary

Oct 4, 2009

. “the world’s now having a field day scapegoating the victim.” The victims are the people of Honduras. As noted by a commentator above this is a country that is only just emerging from 25 years of military rule; their democracy is still fragile and fledgling. This type of behavior by the cabal of political and financial power-brokers and the military does nothing to secure the stability of democratic and lawful traditions in the country or the region. They are perpetrators, not victims. If they did not like what Zelaya was doing, they should have simply followed due process and make him stand trial to answer for his alleged crimes, not highjack the government at gunpoint.

 

mary

Oct 4, 2009

So I got it to work.:)

 

David Ellis

Oct 8, 2009

Mary,
Arrest warrants are served every day in this country at gun point. That doesn't make them illegal. The criminals are then taken to jail where the await trial. That doesn't mean due process isn't served. So I repeat, THE ONLY CRIME COMMITTED IS THAT ZELAYA WENT TO SAN JOSE, COSTA RICA INSTEAD OF JAIL.
And the interim government represents the vast majority of Hondurans, not Zelaya.
The Interim President Micheletti is a courageous eloquent man. He exposed the incredible corruption and power mad tactics of your hero, Zelaya to OAS delegates in this article http://www.examiner.com/x-5325-Orlando-Republican-Examiner~y2009m10d8-Honduras-President-Roberto-Micheletti-blasted-OAS-in-new-round-of-crisis-talks If you're interested in knowing the truth and not being just a closed minded bore, why don't you read it.

 

Mary

Oct 9, 2009

I take it from your name-calling that you must be feeling somewhat insecure in the discussion.

Civility, like the finer things in life, costs nothing; it also enriches and ennobles our human interactions, a sentiment you obviously do not hold.

But, to the discussion: So you agree that sending Zelaya into exile in Costa Rica is a crime. I do too.
Thank you for the link to Mr. Micheletti’s speech. I sure you will understand why I do not consider his perspective on the situation to be objective or impartial. Rather, I will point you to a Reuters news report about what was happening outside the meeting where Micheletti gave this speech:

 

Mary

Oct 9, 2009

”Interim leader Roberto Micheletti chided diplomats from the hemisphere for isolating the poor coffee-growing country after the putsch.

Shortly before the meeting, police fired volleys of tear gas to disperse several hundred people who were marching past the U.S. Embassy in support of Zelaya, a leftist former logging magnate.
Police and soldiers armed with clubs and automatic weapons chased demonstrators who shouted "Help us, OAS." Two people were injured, one by a rubber bullet and another by a gas canister, a local hospital said.”
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE5955EY20091008

 

Mary

Oct 9, 2009

Here is another interesting article Christian science Monitor article that looks at the role of the military in Honduras: http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/1004/p06s05-woam.html

And finally, please tell me if this suggestion for a way forward in a democratic Honduras is consistent with your idea of democracy:

 

Mary

Oct 9, 2009

"Facusse, whose association [the National Association of Industries] vocally supported Zelaya's ouster, said he discussed parts of the plan with Micheletti, including a proposal to make the interim president a congressman-for-life.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jAkMGKIUDg_ngUiZboxQbYj5_DPwD9B21L880

Now this is interesting to me. How is it possible in a democracy for a business leader to even THINK that he can offer to GIVE political office FOR LIFE to another citizen?

There is something extremely odd, and dare I say, undemocratic even about the suggestion? But I take it you can explain that away, I eagerly await your response.

 

davido_de@yahoo.com

Oct 9, 2009

Mary,
The key words in the first article you mentioned is HUNDREDS of protesters. That's blatant sensationalism to obscure the fact that vast majority support Zelaya's constitutional removal.

Your conspiracy theory about Facusse isn't even supported by the author of the article. In another article, I read Zelaya was made the same offer. The point is, we don't know what legal mechanism they're using to make that offer.

If you'd like to read a clear thinking principled first-hand assessment of the situation, Senator Jim DeMint of the Foreign Relations Committee went down there and gave his report in the Wall Street Journal here; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298004574459762462353766.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_opinion#articleTabs%3Darticle

I'll be emailing it to my congressional representatives and demand we stop picking on poor little heroic Honduras.

 

Mary

Oct 9, 2009

While I have provided news reports to support my position that this situation is not supported by the "vast majority of Hondurans" all you have provided is your assertion.
I am glad that the author of the report did not support my "conspiracy theory". I like my news to contain facts only; I can draw my own conclusions thank you.
"In another article I read that Zelaya was made the same offer." Source if you please? I have provided mine.

 

Mary

Oct 9, 2009

As to Mr. De Mint’s article, there are some statements he makes which contradict the news reports of reputable international news agencies from around the world. While I could go into a point by point rebuttal, I am sure this would not change your view and perhaps not even be read.
“I'll be emailing it to my congressional representatives and demand we stop picking on poor little heroic Honduras.”
I am glad and proud that you and I can call and e-mail our elected representatives and make demands that we expect will influence their actions.

 

Mary

Oct 9, 2009

My only regret is that this privilege you are claiming so gleefully was forcibly taken away from the ordinary people of Honduras who are left to be spectators in the events in own country.

 

Mary

Oct 11, 2009

While you contemplate your response, I would like to draw your attention to the latest developments in Honduras:
(CNN) -- A group of independent U.N. experts expressed concern Friday over the increased use of mercenaries in Honduras…The U.N. panel said it received reports that 40 former Colombian paramilitaries had been hired to protect properties and individuals in Honduras since the June 28 coup that ousted President Jose Manuel Zelaya. The panel also heard reports that 120 mercenaries from various Latin American countries had been contracted to support the government of Roberto Micheletti, who was installed as president hours after Zelaya's removal
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/10/09/honduras.mercenaries/

 

Mary

Oct 11, 2009

I am interested in your impressions of this development and its implications for the continuance of a stable democratic state in Honduras.

 

Mary

Oct 11, 2009

If it is true that is, and we have no confirmation yet that it is...

 

Mary

Oct 11, 2009

If these reports are true that is, and we have no other confirmation as yet that they are...

 

Mary

Nov 1, 2009

TEGUCIGALPA (Reuters) - Honduras is on the verge of ending a four-month political crisis after rival camps cut a deal that could return ousted President Manuel Zelaya to power and earn international support for a Nov. 29 election.

Buckling under pressure from U.S. diplomats, negotiators for Zelaya, toppled in a June 28 coup, and the de facto leader Roberto Micheletti who replaced him, agreed to put an end to Central America's worst political turmoil in two decades.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-43568520091031

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story