Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

Gregory Kane: Bad court decisions have lasting consequences

By: Gregory Kane
Examiner Staff Writer
September 10, 2009

Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell has been referred to, disparagingly, as a "culture warrior." Here's why that's a good thing.

Please forgive this use of a second-hand anecdote to drive home my point, but I have no doubt that the incident one of my former students told me about is absolutely true, social conditions in Baltimore being what they are.

She was 21. Her parents emigrated to the United States from Pakistan. She came from a strict Muslim family, and in the strict Islamic tradition, as it is in the similar Judeo-Christian tradition, pre-marital sex is a no-no.

So it was with perfect innocence that she told about four middle-school girls she tutored - in the 13-14-age range - that she was a virgin. (They were the ones who brought the subject up.) She was stunned to learn that all of them not only admitted having had at least one sexual encounter, but that they also seemed proud of it. They boasted about it.

"But don't you worry about getting pregnant?" she asked the girls. Their answer? If they got pregnant, they'd just get an abortion.

That, dear readers, is what American culture has come to: Girls barely into their teens who think so little of life and sexual activity that they just dismiss the chances of getting pregnant with a cavalier "I'll just get an abortion."

And such young women have many enablers in this society, specifically those who insist that laws allowing female minors to have abortions without parental consent are absolutely necessary.

This is precisely the direction where McDonnell saw us heading when he wrote his now-controversial thesis in 1989 in which he excoriated gays and working women. He also, according to some news reports, had the gall to criticize the Supreme Court decision that legalized the sale and use of contraceptives for unmarried couples.

That would be Eisenstadt v. Baird of course, and McDonnell was right to criticize it. In fact, he could have taken on its precedent, Griswold v. Connecticut, and been just as on point. I've said for years that the problem with abortion didn't start with the Roe v. Wade decision. It didn't start with Eisenstadt v. Baird either. The real culprit is the Griswold decision.

A brief recap may be in order. The Supreme Court ruled on the Griswold case in 1965. By a 7-2 vote, the justices struck down a Connecticut law that made it illegal to sell or dispense contraceptive materials to married couples. Justice Potter Stewart called the law "uncommonly silly," but he and fellow dissenter Justice Hugo Black both knew, better than the seven in the majority, what their jobs as justices were.

And it wasn't to overturn every uncommonly silly law the 50 state legislatures passed throughout the country. The high court would have to be in session 24-7 for that. Stewart and Black understood that it was the job of the electorate to vote uncommonly silly legislators out of office, and that, in Griswold, the Supreme Court had exceeded its power.

Black said as much in his dissent. "Use of any such broad, unbounded judicial authority would make of this Court's members a day-to-day constitutional convention," Black wrote. The result would be "a great unconstitutional shift of power to the courts which will be bad for the courts and worse for the country."

Worse turned to worst on Jan. 22, 1973, the day seven Supreme Court justices severed rights from responsibilities. When they struck down laws outlawing abortions in those states that had them, the seven justices who voted in the majority did more than just uphold what was then called a "right to privacy," but has since morphed into "a woman's right to choose."

They ushered in America's "culture of whoopee." Roe v. Wade became the have-sex-and-avoid-the-consequences card for an entire nation. You can bet there were many horny men who picked up the paper on Jan. 23, 1973, read the headline about the Roe decision, and then pumped their fists in the air while loudly whooping "Way to go, Supreme Court!"

Some of those grown men are the very ones having sex with girls like those Baltimore middle schoolers. Such is the culture. If that's the culture McDonnell is going to war against, I wish him Godspeed.

Examiner columnist Gregory Kane is a Pulitzer-nominated news and opinion journalist who has covered people and politics from Baltimore to the Sudan.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

In Defense of Gay Teens and Working Women

Sep 10, 2009

Gay teens are having abortions? Say what, Mr. Kane? Yeah, yeah, I know: Permissiveness is the issue, not pregnancy, abortion, or education. You spend more time complaining about a culture that actually defending the substance of McDonnel's arguments. As usual, you prefer pushback to argument. Why are you making excuses for this nonsense?

 

In Defense of Gay Teens and Working Women

Sep 10, 2009

Correction: "You spend more time complaining about a culture than actually defending the substance of McDonnel's arguments." That's why your anecdote is such a lame point. McDonnell was so parochial about the realities of life choices that he threw working women gays and lesbians under the bus, too. now, he wants to be tolerated as merely a "social conservative". What, specifically, does he want us to conserve?

 

Nick Beddoes

Sep 10, 2009

Gregory Kane is horrendously wrong in condemning the Supreme Court's wise and proper rulings in Griswold v Connecticut, Eisenstadt v Baird, and Roe v Wade. These rulings, in order, protected the right od married couples to buy and use contraceptives, the right of unmarried persons to buy and use contraceptives, and the right of women to follow their consciences in dealing with problem pregnancies. These rulings also protected the First Amendment right to freedom of religion and conscience and protected Americans from government imposition of sectarian moral codes, in line with the First Amendment clause against acts "respecting an establishment of religion". All of these rulings saved women's lives and actually reduced the demand for abortions. If we only had comprehensive sexuality education in all our schools, the teen pregnancy rate would surely go way down.

 

Krystyna

Sep 10, 2009

Nick Beddoes might also have mentioned that Roe v Wade also followed the 13th Amendment, which outlawed slavery. If a woman is forced by government to complete a 9-month pregnancy and then cafe for a child for 18 years, has she not been reduced to slavery to the "guys" (it certainly wasn't women) who hatched the idea that a fertilized egg or an embryo is a "person", contrary to what we learn from both the Bible and science? Also, what planet is Kane from, the same one as Alan Keyes?

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Suspended NASCAR Sprint Cup driver Jeremy Mayfield chats with attendees during a public auction Friday, Nov. 20, 2009, at his Catawba, N.C. property. As NASCAR prepares to crown a champion in its fina...

Long way from the track, suspended Mayfield holds large auction to help pay for court fight

Jeremy Mayfield sat in the back of his large barn Friday morning about 800 miles from where NASCAR's season-ending weekend was kicking off. Several hundred people surrounded him, listening intently as a fast-speaking auctioneer sold dozens of items. Full story

Economy

Venezuela seeks to annul pharmaceutical patents for antibiotic produced by Bayer HealthCare

Venezuela's trade minister says the government plans to annul the pharmaceutical patents for an antibiotic produced by Bayer HealthCare. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story