Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

Newt Gingrich: Democracy: The joke is on us

By: Newt Gingrich
Examiner Columnist
October 9, 2009

It turns out, the joke was on us.

This August, while thousands of Americans were dutifully attending town hall meetings to let their elected representatives know they oppose big government, big bureaucracy, high tax health care, unelected congressional staff were huddling in Washington writing their own health care bill.

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee bill that emerged on Sept. 17 had actually been voted on by the committee two months earlier. For two months, the Democrats who control the committee refused to let anyone read the bill, not members of the committee, not other Senators, not the American people.

Now we know why. While they held the bill hostage, unelected HELP committee staff made over 70 changes to it. No votes were held as substantive parts of the bill were changed or eliminated.

Provisions that had been agreed to by the elected members of the committee - such as requiring parental consent for children to receive health services at school - were eliminated at the whim of partisan staff members.

And this is just the beginning of a legislative process that has become so corrupted it's a wonder we bother to elect members of Congress anymore. Once the Senate Finance Committee passes their health care bill, three Senators - Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-WV), Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and HELP Committee member Chris Dodd (D-CT) - will meet in secret with their staff to produce a final bill.

Think about it: All of the power of the United States Senate to transform one-sixth of our economy will be in the hands of three men and their aides. It's government by staff, aided by lobbyists, for the benefit of bureaucrats.

No wonder so many Democrats in Congress are so dead set against having members read - and more importantly, allowing the American people to read - bills before they vote on them.

Republicans and moderate Democrats have repeatedly pushed for a requirement that bills be posted online 72 hours before a vote in order to allow Americans and members of Congress to know what's in them before they become law. The Democratic leadership has repeatedly blocked or voted down these attempts at transparency.

An overwhelming majority of Americans support "read the bill" reforms, but Democratic leaders dismiss this desire for openness with a mixture of condescension, contempt and confusion.

"Let's be honest about it. Most people don't read the legislative language," was Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry's response.

"I don't expect to actually read the legislative language because reading the legislative language is among the more confusing things I've ever read in my life," said Sen. Thomas Carper, D-DE.

"What good is reading the bill if it's a thousand pages and you don't have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?" said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. John Conyers, D-MI.

The Democrats' insistence on not reading bills before they make them law brings to mind two possible motives, neither of them good: Either they are trying to rush through laws they know the American people don't support, or they are passing legislation that is too sweeping and complicated to be understood.

Either way, they're making a mockery of government "of the people, by the people and for the people."

With the technology we have today, there's no excuse for the American people to be cut out of the lawmaking process. There's even less excuse for lawmakers themselves to opt out of it.

We've seen what results when bills aren't read before they're passed. The mammoth, pork-filled $787 stimulus bill didn't appear online until after 10pm the night before it was voted on.

Here's a solution: Every bill should be posted online at least 72 hours before a vote. Every committee "markup" meeting to amend a bill should be webcast. And every amendment should be filed online in real time.

If we demand our right to be a part of the legislative process, we can keep our republic. If we don't, the joke really is on us. .

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich has published 19 books, including 10 fiction and nonfiction best-sellers. He is the founder of the Center for Health Transformation and chairman of American Solutions for Winning the Future. For more information, see newt.org. His exclusive column for The Examiner appears Fridays.




beltway confidential

The highest form of flattery! Robert, declare yourself! (ap photo) Beltway Confidential knows a crush when she sees one. How else to explain the relentless mocking and...

You're beautiful, Chuck Todd. I mean that. (ap photo) On a day when many White House reporters (ahem) stayed away from the White House for snow or early-deadline...

Two James Madison University students are facing felony charges for throwing snowballs at a Harrisonburg city snow plow and an unmarked police car called to investigate during...

Upstart Texas gubernatorial candidate Debra Medina is gaining in the polls and now sits 4 points behind Kay Bailey Hutchison. From PPP: Medina is coming on strong and polls...






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Dennis Kolb Sr.

Oct 9, 2009

Newt;I'm shocked that You,and even Glenn Beck have discovered Corruption in DC.Politics..As the former Speaker of the House of Reps.You must have never entered the Capitol to be so nieve of obvious activity!!The two party system has ruined Public Liberty,Public Trust of Politicians and the Constitution's rightful place as the Supreme Law of the Land!The sad thing is that,unless American's Pledge to one another,Never To Vote For Candidates Of Either Party,But only those who run on their own values and convictions,We will have no choice but to hold our nose and vote Republican..God Help Us!!!!PLEASE!!

 

rey jacobs

Oct 9, 2009

In other words, they shouldn't be passing the thing! This crap about making bills so complicated nobody can read or understand them (especially congress itself since we all the clowns up there are the stupidest of the stupid) is what's wrong with this country. We need to get rid of legalese and have the bills written in plain English so that the sub-morons who vote on them can read them and so they can be intelligently debated with the American people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Retired CPO

Oct 9, 2009

The founding fathers, looking around at the size of the country, decided to form a Republic rather than a democracy. There was no way the multitudes of people could be kept apprised of the needs and deeds of the country. Enter the internet some 250 years later. Voila!! It is possible now. Perhaps a few minor adjustments to the Constitution are in order. just suppose all bills before the House and Senate were required to be published 10 business days before voting began in the respective body. Suppose that bills sent for reconciliation would be required to reconcile rather than rewrite or originate and that any substantive changes from reconciliation would require reexamination by each house before approval. Wow!! No Health Care; No Cap and Trade!! No TARP!! No Stimulus!! No Card Check!! Less debt!!

 

Ashen

Oct 9, 2009

What good does demanding to be part of the legislative process do when DC doesn't listen. That won't save our republic. Its becoming increasingly clear that the only way to save our republic is through civil war. No one wants to say it but everyone is thinking it.

 

Odysseus

Oct 9, 2009

Newt,

I love ya, but I can remember when you were in Nancy Pelosi's position. You had a lock on the House and the GOP had a simple majority in the Senate. Why didn't you pass such a law then? The Internet wasn't big back then, but you could have at least passed the 72-hour rule.

I'm sorry, but even though I'm a Republican, I get a little miffed at all these things the GOP now think should be law when they controlled Congress for twelve years. You guys did a good job with the Contract with America, but where was the follow up contract in '96, '98, '00, etc?

If the electorate in this country ever graces the GOP with a majority again, I hope they will remember this and get to work passing laws instead of acting like Democrats.

 

novadine

Oct 9, 2009

These people are really sticking it to us in the bill. Notice how it will take effect 2013, after Obama hopes he will be re-elected. Then the poo will hit the fan when Americans see how they have been screwed. I too, wish the Republicans would have been looking out more for the citizens when they had the chance. Why isn't it illegal for bills to be written and passed like this? How many citizens feel duped like me?

 

Rita

Oct 9, 2009

With the Congress we now have we all know the joke is on us. I can't wait until 2010 to take some of these arrogant people out of our Congress, then only if people lose that I would vote your Congressmen but not mine, it that happens then the joke is really on us and we will deserve it!

 

jukin

Oct 9, 2009

IIRC, there was a rule 3 day rule from Jefferson. However, I will be delighted if the bills are written before they are voted on. Reading them would be like a cherry on top.

 

Anna

Oct 10, 2009

I took the time to read the first bill that came out online, making copies of excerpts of pertinent parts of which I vehemently disagreed. This is the American way to do things. Now that we won't have an ample opportunity to read the final draft it does go to prove that the majority party is, in fact, making a mockery of "Government By and For The People." Welcome to Amerika, Komrades.

 

tmginnova

Oct 10, 2009

Expecting a serious comment about an important issue from Newt Gingrich is not very realistic. He's shocked, shocked (!) to find out that our elected representatives have staffs and need detailed language to deal with detailed issues. When he was in charge, I'm sure none of this happened! Of course, when he was in charge, nothing much happened . . except rhetoric (and the occasional GOP leader being jailed or resigning in shame). Americans want serious leaders to deal with tough issues in competent ways, not just blow off their mouths like old Newt. That's why he and his gang were thrown out of office!

 

usanomore

Oct 11, 2009

It really is funny that the Republicans bills are written in English that is easy to read. Could it be they aren't trying to hide it from the public? Corrupt is and always will be the donkey party. It's why they got tossed before!

 

Jan 11, 2010

projeksiyon
plazma kiralama
Projeksiyon Kiralama
Led ekran Kiralama
Simultane
Ses sistemi kiralama

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story