Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

Forget about renaming Reagan National

By: Barbara Hollingsworth
Examiner Columnist
July 6, 2009

When H.R. Crawford, chairman of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, mentioned at a MWAA Board meeting last week that he had heard "talk" on Capitol Hill about removing former President Ronald Reagan's name from Washington National Airport, he undoubtedly didn't anticipate the firestorm that would ensue. Frankly, neither did I.



Thanks to the Internet, a small blog posting went viral all over the country and people who live far from Washington are now steaming at the implied insult to our late 40th president. They'd be even hotter under the collar if they knew the backstory.



In 1997, Congress renamed the airport in honor of Reagan. The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and went into effect on Feb. 6, 1998 - Reagan's 77th birthday.



Although a big admirer of Reagan, I opposed the renaming of the airport at the time, noting that it was a bit creepy to memorialize someone who was still alive. But neither Congress nor President Clinton were swayed by my suggestion to wait a respectable amount of time after the Gipper was called to his final reward. So the airport name change became official.



Three years later, however, Metro passengers disembarking at the airport station would have no way of knowing that it was now Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport - and had been for some time - because the Metropolitan Washington Area Transit Authority (WMATA) refused to change the signage, claiming doing so would cost $400,000. Chris Zimmerman, the WMATA Board member from Arlington, said his county would definitely not pick up the tab.



This sudden attack of frugality came right after WMATA presumably paid $3.2 million to change the signs at eight other renamed Metro stations between 1999 and 2000. In 2001, 24 members of Congress signed a letter to WMATA requesting that the airport signs finally be changed. It was only until Rep. Bob Barr, R-GA, threatened to withhold federal funds that it finally happened during the scheduled 2003-04 renovation of the station. Then General Manager Richard White admitted that WMATA paid for the renaming - six years after it was ordered by Congress and the president.



Now, just five years later, Democrats on Capitol Hill are apparently so upset just seeing Reagan's name that they are "talking" about renaming the airport. The fact that Crawford mentioned it at a MWAA Board meeting means that this silly notion has gotten far beyond the stage where most horrible ideas die unmourned. It's time to plant a public stake in the heart of this one.



The current crop of Democrats on Capitol Hill apparently don't care to be reminded of Reagan's limited government vision for America, even though under his conservative administration the federal leviathon continued to grow. But Reagan's prescription for the stagflation he inherited from Jimmy Carter - particularly his 1981 tax cut - is the exact opposite of what President Barack Obama says will cure the ailing body politic.



History already tells us that Reagan pulled the U.S. economy out of what then was the worst economic tailspin since the Great Depression, increasing economic output by $15 trillion. The success of Obama's plan is still to be determined. Maybe the obvious comparison is just too uncomfortable.



But besides being so blatantly partisan that it will make Democrats look small and petty, the idea that you can take back an honorific and give it to somebody you like better is an abominable idea. That not only goes for Reagan, but for Thurgood Marshall, John F. Kennedy and any other public figure whose name graces an airport, bridge,or building. Playing naming musical chairs whenever a new party is in power trivializes the honor itself - like yanking a Congressional Medal of Honor off one former hero's chest so you can pin on a new recipient.



If this makes politicians think twice next time about bestowing what should be an irrevocable accolade, so much the better.



Barbara F. Hollingsworth is The Examiner's local opinion editor.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Jack Adams

Jul 6, 2009

If this idea has any merit, perhaps it should be considered in a broader context. Why not change the names of all buildings, bridges, and other structures to "Taxpayer Funded". Thus the Kennedy Center in DC and JFK airport could be called "Taxpayer Place" and the many things that Robert Byrd, senator from Earmark, has named after him be called "West Virginia Taxpayer" whatever. It would be a reminder that Bobby Byrd didn't do a thing but tack his name onto something that every American paid for but somehow the former Grand Kleagle of the KKK gets to have his name plastered all over the place. Renaming the thousands of places dedicated to politicians would be a stimulus in every state of the union, and create jobs, jobs, jobs.

 

Dave of DC now in SF

Jul 6, 2009

It WILL ALWAYS be Washington National,,,,please someone, anyone- remove the evil RR name that was bestowed upon it

 

For the Record

Jul 6, 2009

"history already tells us that Reagan pulled the US economy out of what was then the worst economic tailspin since the Great Depression." What history is that? Revisionist? Republican hagiography? The US economy rebounded from the severe recession of the early 1980s b/c of the tight disciplined control of credit by Paul Volcker and the Fed which broke the cycle of stagflation that the country was experiencing and set the stage for the recovery that lasted through 1987. Love Reagan or hate him, but get the history right.

 

mairzydoats

Jul 6, 2009

Ummm, if honorifics are not to be revoked what about WASHINGTON National Airport? Remember him?

 

Joseph Wootten

Jul 6, 2009

Frankly, we need a law that bars government money from being spent on anything named after a politician that hasn't been dead for more than 10 years. That little move alone would help reduce pork. They should not be able to spend our money on their legacy. Got that Charlie Rangel? Jack Murtha? Robert KKK Byrd? Ted Kennedy?

 

Peter Vaughan

Jul 14, 2009

I seem to recall it was named for our 1st president.

 

C Higgins

Jul 17, 2009

You say, "But besides being so blatantly partisan that it will make Democrats look small and petty, the idea that you can take back an honorific and give it to somebody you like better is an abominable idea."

The original name change was just one in a wave partisan names changes to honor Pres. Reagan. Anywhere they could think of to put his name they did. The Slap in the face with the original name change was to unions and specifically the Air Traffic Controllers which the esteemed Pres. Reagan broke.

Name change right or wrong, I still call it National Airport. Not sure I would support another change unless back to that simple Washington National Airport.

 

Robert

Aug 16, 2009

As a fired Patco controller I remember Reagan accepting our union's endorsement (one of the few that broke with the AFL-CIO) and promising to address I grievances over a new contract. Well, he sure did, when he put over 10,000 American families on the street. This whole renaming thing for the airport was dreamed up by Grover Norquist, a far right partisan, who took great pleasure in slapping working folks in their faces. Disgusting, to this day.

 

Ashwini

Aug 22, 2009

Barbara,
Thanks for discussing this topic. Would you mind sharing your sources; I am doing some research into the history of airports and it would be very helpful.
My best, Ashwini

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Suspended NASCAR Sprint Cup driver Jeremy Mayfield chats with attendees during a public auction Friday, Nov. 20, 2009, at his Catawba, N.C. property. As NASCAR prepares to crown a champion in its fina...

Long way from the track, suspended Mayfield holds large auction to help pay for court fight

Jeremy Mayfield sat in the back of his large barn Friday morning about 800 miles from where NASCAR's season-ending weekend was kicking off. Several hundred people surrounded him, listening intently as a fast-speaking auctioneer sold dozens of items. Full story

Economy

Venezuela seeks to annul pharmaceutical patents for antibiotic produced by Bayer HealthCare

Venezuela's trade minister says the government plans to annul the pharmaceutical patents for an antibiotic produced by Bayer HealthCare. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story