Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

Gregory Kane: Get a handgun, save a life

By: Gregory Kane
Examiner Staff Writer
September 24, 2009

With one swift slash from a samurai sword, John Pontolillo made a convincing case for ... private ownership of handguns?

Oh, you betcha.

Pontolillo is an undergraduate at Johns Hopkins University. Before Sept. 15, that's all he was: One of the many JHU students who have to bust their humps studying so they can graduate from one of the most challenging and academically competitive campuses in the country.

But nine days ago, Pontolillo went from being a simple college guy to being in the center of the maelstrom that developed after he slashed a burglar in the backyard of a house he shared with fellow JHU students.

Pontolillo used a samurai sword to defend himself after the burglar lunged at him. With one swish he nearly severed the burglar's left hand and pierced his chest. The man bled to death before paramedics could arrive.

The alleged burglar - and I'm using that word "alleged" guardedly here - was a career criminal with more than 20 arrests to his credit, based on what I was able to learn from the Web site www.courts.state.md. Donald Rice was 49 years old and had been charged over the years with assault, resisting arrest, drug possession and theft.

On Aug. 16 of last year, apparently Rice went completely bonkers. Baltimore County police charged him with 28 offenses stemming from one incident. Most of the charges were dropped, but Rice served at least six months anyway.

He'd only been out of prison three days when he met his tragic but predictable end in that backyard. Rice sounds much like the character Vernon Johns notoriously eulogized. (Johns was the immediate predecessor of Martin Luther King Jr. at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Ala.)

The deceased was, like Rice, a career miscreant. Those expecting a sympathetic eulogy didn't know Johns very well.

"He lived a trifling and useless life," Johns said. "He walked around Montgomery daring someone to slit his throat. Last week somebody obliged him. He lived like a dog; he died like a dog. Undertaker, claim the body."

Rice seemed cut from the same cloth, which may be why some in the Baltimore area cheered his death. But, inevitably, some cast him as a victim too. A Baltimore Sun editorial lamented the killing, claiming that "even burglars don't deserve to be killed with a razor-sharp sword." (That leaves us all to ponder this question: What, exactly, DO burglars deserve to be killed with?) Later, in the same editorial, the writer pondered what would have happened if Rice had been armed.

And there, dear readers, you have a classic example of what I call lib-think. I take it you noticed the underlying assumption: Criminals are supposedto be armed. It's kind of in their job description. But law-abiding citizens being armed? Oh, perish the thought.

Let's suppose how the scenario would have played out had Pontolillo been armed, not with a samurai sword, but a handgun.

Would Rice have been so quick to lunge? Or would he have turned tail and skedaddled, which is what criminals tend to do when confronted with gun-toting, law-abiding citizens?

I can see the scenario: Pontolillo says to Rice, "Mr. Burglar, I'd like you to meet two of my best buddies ever, those esteemed Americans Mr. Smith and Mr. Wesson. You might want to stay put until police arrive."

And Rice would have done so. Or fled. Bottom line: He'd be alive today to tell the tale. So private ownership of firearms actually saves lives, and could have saved Rice's.

That's not just my opinion. Gary Kleck, a criminologist at Florida State University, has done research to show that Americans use firearms one million times a year to defend themselves.

According to the book "The Seven Myths of Gun Control" by Richard Poe, Kleck found that "in 98 percent of those cases, no shots [were] fired. The criminal [fled] at the mere sight of the gun."

If there's a lesson for Pontolillo to learn, it's to give up that sword and buy a handgun.

 

Examiner Columnist Gregory Kane is a Pulitzer-nominated news and opinion journalist who has covered people and politics from Baltimore to the Sudan.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Xanadu

Sep 23, 2009

Amen. Another great article Mr. Kane.

 

JoeG

Sep 23, 2009

I would agree, most people would much rather be shot to death than hacked to death. Also, most dumb criminals don't realize just how much damage a bladed weapon can inflict.

 

No More Packing

Sep 24, 2009

This is a "story with holes". Some glaring questions: (1) Why did the trespasser "lunge"? Was he trying to run away, like a cornered rat, and the only way out was through the samurai student? (2) Is there a death penalty for trespassing, even if you have a criminal rap sheet? (3) Don't criminals also run away when confronted by unarmed people? Don't common criminals seek to avoid confrontation of ANY sort? Gun or no gun, it's difficult to determine the threshold that causes criminals to flee. We know little to nothing about what went down, yet you chose to write a column anyway. (No surprise there.) Don't let the facts get in the way of ideological boilerplates.

 

greg

Sep 24, 2009


What the heck was the point of this article? If the guy had a gun the criminal would be alive? How much did the gun lobby pay you for this one?

 

here@home.com

Sep 24, 2009

Facts are in dispute in this story. However, one undisputed fact remains: the criminal died while his victim did not. Can we at least accept that a life of crime incurs the risk of death at the hands of one's intended victims? Or has the inherent human right of self defense been abolished completely in Maryland?

 

No More Packing

Sep 24, 2009

One hopes that the intended victims don't feel the need to use lethal force against nonlethal criminals. Not all crimes are existential threats, yet we act as though ANY perceived threat (even trespassing) is potentially lethal. Cooler heads must prevail. Does anyone know of nonlethal means of self defense, aside from the martial arts or mace?

 

Snorky

Sep 24, 2009

Anyone who is well trained in self defense and threat management will tell you all crimes and any perceived threat holds the potential to become a lethal encounter. To believe otherwise is to live in a fantasy land.

 

No More Packing

Sep 25, 2009

You mean the fantasy land where every encounter with a trespasser is an existential crisis? Most homicides are domestic matters that involve acquaintances, not strangers on the street. Criminal situations most likely to be fatal involve family and friends, not creepy trespassers. I don't see any Greg Kane columns about packing heat to protect yourself from cousins and siblings; he's obsessed with boogeymen.

 

Benefit of the Doubt

Sep 25, 2009

So you are suggesting he should have gave the career criminal that had broken into his home and assumed that as the man lunged at him, he wasn't going to try to wrestle the sword away, but instead run free and never hurt anyone else again? When faced with a criminal in your home they usually don't have the best of intentions. Criminals don't think twice before they kill someone. I think there's nothing wrong with something like this making the news and getting them think twice before breaking in.

 

No More Packing

Sep 25, 2009

Actually, criminals DO think twice before killing. Not all muggings and carjackings become homicides, after all. Certainly, not all burgularies wind up as assaults; most criminals break into places they beleive to be unoccupied (like parked cars with GPS systems stuck to their windshields). We know little about the circumstances surrounding this incident. All I'm reading is a WHOLE lot of presumption, with even more ideological stroking. This cultural myth of the big, bad homicidal home invader needs to stop.

 

Jay

Sep 25, 2009

Maybe the "cultural myth" will stop when big bad homicidal home invaders stop invading homes and comitting homicides. You can believe all crimes are crimes of opportunity with no human contact, or better yet try convincing the Balt PD officer that was shot last night in an attemted robbery that homicidal criminals don't exsist

 

No More Packing

Sep 25, 2009

It's not that the homicidal criminals don't exist, but that they are a small number of totals criinal population. I ask again, how many murdering strangers are out there really? Are we letting a tiny portion of the criminals (which are a pretty small portion of most neighborhoods) scare us silly? Do we fear the murderous 10 percent of the 10 percent that is merely criminal? Are we THAT scared of one percent of the population, if it's even THAT much? Sheesh.

 

see elsie

Sep 25, 2009

So the crook died. No sorrow. just think about all the people this guy has hurt in his life. It is even possible that by killing him an innocent life was saved. I had a business. two guys came in with the intent to rob me. I spotted them and was suspicious and managed to get a customer out and call the cops. They showed up and the threat was over. I was armed and deadly if i wished to be. I have forever since wished I had killed the big one. two weeks later he robed and killed a woman in another business in town. I could have prevented a good persons death and a good persons family a lot of grief. Something simular has happened to me twice in my 74 years. I will not hesitate again. My tax money is still feeding and housing the b--d.

 

tdrag

Sep 26, 2009

It is so amazing to hear Liberals justify the activities of the Donald Rice's of this world and condemn those who defend themselves as Mr Pontolillo did. This piece of human debris got what he deserved. As a career criminal he knew that this could happen some day, he counted on Mr. Pontolillo running away, but his victim refused to submit. Those of you who don't believe in self defense should hire yourselves out as human shields.

 

LibertyLover

Sep 27, 2009

It is a known fact criminals avoid homes
where they know the owner may be armed.
Guns not only save lives, but prevent
crime as well.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Houston Rockets coach Rick Adelman, center, reacts with his staff Jack Sikma, left, and Elston Turner, right, to a called foul against his team as they play the Atlanta Hawks during the third quarter ...

Tracy McGrady says he's ready to play, Rockets believe it's still too soon after knee surgery

Tracy McGrady is eager to play. The Houston Rockets say he'll have to wait. Full story

Economy

NC state treasurer issues gift ban for employees, limits on soliciting for charity

State Treasurer Janet Cowell unveiled new rules Friday banning employees from taking gifts from companies that do substantial business with the agency and setting a limit on charitable solicitations. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story