Hugh Hewitt

[Print]  [Email]        

Hugh Hewitt: Deepak Chopra’s hate speech

By: Hugh Hewitt
Examiner Columnist
November 1, 2009

President Obama signed “hate crimes” legislation last week, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued a statement praising the new law, saying that in “this country, no one should suffer persecution, discrimination or violence because of who they are, how they look or what they believe.”

Amen to that thought, and amen especially to the idea of protecting belief, including beliefs unpopular within liberal opinion elites. Perhaps the president and the speaker can find some time to let their left-wing supporters know that the accusation of hate is itself hateful, and that slanders against Christians for holding to their beliefs and the beliefs of hundreds of generations of Christians before them are as repugnant to them as the verbal attacks by bigots on people of color.

Spiritualist Deepak Chopra comes to mind as one of the Left’s loudest purveyors of hate speech. Chopra has a problem with the beliefs of mainstream Christianity and its place in America and American history, but his deep prejudice goes unrebuked by champions of tolerance like Pelosi.

Chopra’s first salvo against mainstream Christianity was fired in the Huffington Post after last fall’s presidential forum hosted by Pastor Rick Warren at Saddleback Valley Community Church.

“For me,” Chopra wrote, “the God quiz that Barack Obama endured with barely concealed sweaty palms and that John McCain breezed through with seasoned casualness has no place in American politics.”

Chopra then served up a classic bit of “leftist tolerance”: “The reason that any contemporary presidential candidate is forced to suffer the indignity of confessing his religious beliefs in public goes back to the Reagan revolution. ... Reagan, after all, was the president who, if left to his own devices, would have let thousands more AIDS victims die through neglect and lack of funding for basic medical research.

“The implicit reason, well understood by the right and endorsed by fundamentalists, was that gays deserve what they get if they pursue a lifestyle that doesn’t match right-wing Christian ideology. Minorities, women, immigrants, and progressivism in general were given the same back hand.”

The demonization of political opponents is routine on the Left, but Chopra’s poisonous rewrite of history has few parallels within the mainstream.

Chopra resurfaced with another screed when Obama’s inauguration featured the same Warren. More thunder from the New Age guru: “The right wing may posture as if Christianity deserves special privilege and pride of place. Their posturing has convinced a lot of people for the past 20 years, but it’s high time we threw the whole charade out the window.” (Emphasis added.)

Still more Chopra invective surfaced in The Washington Post this September, again targeting Warren and reflecting the charm of the Left. “The abuse delivered by right-wing Christians is such an old story that we are long past irony,” Chopra wrote, before moving on to his favorite target.

“The Rev. Rick Warren has a record for trying to smooth the waters, but he also flirts with intolerance — toward gay marriage, for instance — and since his rationale is that a ‘loving’ God shares the same prejudices, what’s to stop others with worse tempers from following the same logic? When your God hates, you have permission to hate,” Chopra wrote.

When your guru hates, I guess that gives you permission to hate as well?

Chopra’s rage against mainstream Christianity may have its roots in nothing more complicated than a simple though vast jealousy at Warren’s enormous success, and not just success in selling books but in attracting tens of thousands of pastors and their congregations to a revitalized Christian faith in the new millennium.

Warren’s call, heeded by millions of American Christians, to lead faith-filled lives, to give sacrificially and to work for the alleviation of suffering across the planet has been the focus of astonished applause by intelligent observers across the political spectrum.

Warren’s church and the millions of American Christians who hold similar beliefs and practice similar disciplines model authentic and traditional Christian belief. There isn’t much to hate there, but Chopra and others on the Left want to try to transform mainstream Christian belief in traditional marriage into a postmodern scarlet letter, and they will use the tactics of extremist hate if they have to.

We are not “long past irony” here, just face to face with the unpleasant reality of the Left’s genuine agenda of silencing its opponents.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

George Duncan

Nov 2, 2009

Yes, you nailed it. Chopra is one of the best in masking hatred as "tolerance."

 

J.R.

Nov 2, 2009

"...no one should suffer persecution, discrimination or violence because of who they are, how they look or what they believe."

We were already set up for that in the Constitution and Bill of Rights--weren't we?

 

ladybug

Nov 2, 2009

We can keep Chopra in our prayers that he will be able to set aside his own prejudices.

 

harleyone

Nov 2, 2009

For a fellow who professes so much peace and love he sure sounds hatefilled.

 

planb247

Nov 2, 2009

Truth hurts, doesn't it Hugh. Chopra is right about all those things, too bad you're so blinded by your own beliefs to have any idea about that though.

 

Tom65

Nov 2, 2009

Criminy, here we go again with the poor persecuted Christian majority crap...

 

Michael Kennedy

Nov 2, 2009

I am no fan of Warren but Chopra is an example of the weird enthusiasms of the left. Crystal healing anyone ?

 

DocForesight

Nov 2, 2009

@planb247 and Tom65 - Evidence, please, on Pastor Warren's "hate speech" and "intolerance". Or is your evidence limited to the fact that he holds to the same definition of marriage that President Obama holds?

If either of you invested any time in listening to Hugh's program or reading his books, you'd know he is one of the most thoughtful, fair-minded, tolerant hosts and authors currently in media.

Care to comment about the recent Larry David urination spectacle? What a coward. Try that with a picture of Mohammad and see what response he gets.

 

Huh?

Nov 2, 2009

This column is complete nonsense. Saying that group A is hateful does not make group B hateful ipso facto.

Hugh Hewitt needs a course in logic.

 

hamaca

Nov 2, 2009

So "the God quiz...has no place in American politics". I'd love to hear Chopra's comments on Mitt Romney's experience. I'd also be interested in how people can justify being outraged at Chopra's comments while at the same time having stood by or participated in the dismantling of the candidacy of a very viable one-time front-runner based primarily on his religion (while lying about their true intent and concerns). Hypocrisy all around.

 

zlarthon

Nov 2, 2009

The only people who refuse to admit the Left hates Christians are those involved in the hate-crime...

If Christians were guilty of all these haters claim, Gays, atheists, and other such "persecuted" groups would already be in the ovens...

 

jcp

Nov 2, 2009

Thank you Hugh. The lack of tolerance among those that ask for tolerance is mind boggling.

 

phillyfanatic

Nov 2, 2009

Hearing Hugh each day out in SoCal, this column is why I do. He hits this out of the park , unlike my Phillies! Chopra and all the other Lefty gurus on TV, in the Hollywood crowd, the artsy community, the university profs are the real haters in this nation. They do not want the Judeo-Christian worldview to even be taught anymore and our 'yutes of America' are showing it with their hatred of any godly authority and their acceptance of socialist pacifism. What will happen to the Left if, when, a new Great Awakening happens again? It might not be just a spiritual awakening but a return to liberty, freedom, capitalism and our Constitutional understandings. Now how would the Left TOLERATE that?

 

Xplorer

Nov 3, 2009

“The implicit reason, well understood by the right and endorsed by fundamentalists, was that gays deserve what they get if they pursue a lifestyle that doesn’t match right-wing Christian ideology. Minorities, women, immigrants, and progressivism in general were given the same back hand.”

Even when they win they sound like they lost.

How is it the fault of Christians that gay men have the average life expectancy of people in the 1800's? ... just because Christians have the hutzpah to say it out loud.
Maranatha!

 

Derrick C

Nov 3, 2009

Chopra has many cult followers who share his sick, hateful bigotry toward Christians. Chopra doesn't give a ratsazz about gay marriage or minorities -- they are merely agitprops for spewing his irrational, psychotic rage.

 

RicardoCabeza

Nov 3, 2009

Chopra is a new age tool bag of the highest order but in this particular case the idiot got it right, but the relgionilist don't want to hear it.

 

Stephen A.

Nov 3, 2009

I don't buy into Deepak Chopra's New Age beliefs, and he's pretty vicious about the gay marriage issue (it's not hate, Deepak, it's a public policy discussion) but he's right about the dominance of Christianity having passed. It can't dominate in politics at a time when millions have fled Christianity for one reason or another (either because it's too liberal or too fundamentalist) and they have been for a generation. Politicians, conservative ones especially, should be sensitive to the fact that their views are shared by Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus and even many "unchurched" and non-theist folks out there, and appeal to THEM, too. What's wrong with that?

 

morgan s.

Nov 3, 2009

I am not a democrat. i did not vote for Obama. I despise liberal politics. I do not believe in Mr. Chopra's spiritual teachings.
I agree 100% with what he has to say about the right wing and christianity.
I am not a christian, i do not believe in god. It is the right's inability to put forth a political agenda without attempting to force christianity with it that makes it impossible for me to fully support the republican party though all of my political beliefs are represented by their party.

 

vsatt

Nov 4, 2009

If sharing your religious beliefs is considered an "indignity," then maybe you should reconsider your religious beliefs.

 

biffula

Nov 4, 2009

to me, the saddest thing is that as a country and a world we seem to be getting dumber instead of evolving and getting smarter. By that I mean there seem to be more and more that actually are Dems and believe in the nonsense they stand for... that and that there are people who follow Oprah, and chopra and their ilk. We're doomed.

 

Oneofthesheep

Nov 4, 2009

Chopra is neither on the right or left; he's a New Ager. All New Agers harbor hostility toward the real Jesus and authentic Christianity. This should come as no surprise. I disagree with what Chopra says, but I would not call his remarks "hate speech."

Christians should be more concerned about the spread of New Age beliefs through popular writers like Chopra, rather than looking for political statements as "hate speech." That is the least of our problems.

 

Ed

Nov 4, 2009

hugh: the right wing fanatics demonize everyone they don't like/tolerate. They think they're god, but they're NOT. They're robotrons!!

 

Totally Shocked

Dec 7, 2009

Deepak is Sceduled to appear on Conan O'Brien's "The Tonight Show" to night as the Feature Guest! The Promos are Shocking! Look at NBC.com Why would they have a guest RIGHT BEFORE CHRISTMAS that insists that the bible is Mythology and talks about the Jesus Myth. Now Deepak is being sold as entertainment.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story