Jonetta Rose Barras

[Print]  [Email]        

Blacks and gays in D.C.: It’s complicated

By: Jonetta Rose Barras
Examiner Columnist
May 14, 2009

When I met Carlene Cheatham, I considered her then, as I do now, a dynamic black woman. A year later, I learned she was a lesbian.

Other African Americans made that disclosure, using coded language common when heterosexuals discuss homosexuals.

“I was never inside. I've always been able to be just who I am,” Cheatham said during a recent telephone conversation as we discussed the D.C. Council's 12 to 1 vote last week requiring the District to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions.  Cheatham is helping to organize a meeting Saturday where Democrats in the predominantly African-American Ward 8 will debate a resolution to support the  “marriage equality” movement.

“I have four older brothers. They never came home and told who they were sleeping with. And when I decided I preferred women, I never felt I had to announce that. I just moved on,” she added.

Black Washington is a “don't ask, don't tell” world. If people know, there's a  “don't-rub-it-in-the-face” attitude. Homosexuals and heterosexuals exist in parallel universes; their relationship is complex and complicated. There is an unofficial covenant that seeks to prevent an intersection or damage the core conservative, Christian-based, African-American culture.

Some people believe homophobia is central to the black community's “silence” doctrine. Certainly, I have met African Americans who are repulsed by homosexuality; a few have even disowned relatives.  But, as I have traveled around the city, talking with heterosexuals and gays, I found that most often they tolerate and respect each other.

All that is changing. The increasingly intense debate — advanced mostly by white gays — over same-sex marriages threatens the carefully crafted covenant between the black gay and straight communities. People are being forced to talk about things they’d rather not discuss. Resentment and anxiety permeates the air.

“Nobody is trying to alienate, ostracize or brutalize gay people. This can’t be forced down people's throat,” said a black Ward 1 resident — one of many people who requested anonymity, fearing
an attack.

“I am offended that they are calling this a civil rights issue and equating it with interracial marriages. Besides, those marriages were between men and women,” says a Ward 5 African-American resident. “We may love our gay friends, neighbors and family. But don’t want to see them enter holy matrimony.”

I appreciate that sentiment. Like President Barack Obama, I support civil unions. I cling to cultural mores and teachings that are anchored in a religion that, truth told, I don’t practice with regularity but which nonetheless guides many of my decisions.

“I understand our history. I understand how people were brought up,” said Cheatham. “What I am saying to different people is there has to be an education. We have to open ourselves up to what already exists. There isn't anywhere you go where we aren't already in the house.

“There isn’t going to be a cultural change,” Cheatham added

Many black heterosexuals aren't convinced. History offers a different story.

Jonetta Rose Barras, host of WPFW-FM’s “D.C. Politics with Jonetta,” can be reached at Rosebook1@aol.com.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

boarderthom

May 14, 2009

Compare and contrast; one of my high school english teachers drilled that into my head. Compare and contrast: Slave rights and gay rights; the contrasts are easy, the comparisons are profound. Slaves could not get legally married either. They could not create and sign contracts, and what is marriage mostly (legally speaking) but a huge contract with thousands of rights and responsibilities.
 Navanethem Pillay, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights spoke there last year saying, "That just like apartheid laws that criminalized sexual relations between different races, laws against homosexuality are increasingly becoming recognized as anachronistic and inconsistent both with international law and with traditional values of dignity, inclusion, and respect for all." 
Apartheid: A system of laws applied to one category of citizens in order to isolate them and keep them from having privileges and opportunities given to all others. 
Stop gay apartheid.

 

Rob Pegues

May 14, 2009

I sent you, Jonetta, an email about this, before I noticed it was on the web and I could just comment. Let me summarize; it was wrong when white culture was bigoted. It's also wrong when black culture is bigoted. I think the reason that a lot of people don't understand the comparison between gay marriage and inter-racial marriage is simple - you're not the child of a mixed marriage. I assure you that as one of those children, this IS a civil rights issue.

 

BobInDC

May 14, 2009

Saying that you favor Civil Unions sounds uninformed. In the District, we have a comphrensive domestic partnership law. If you don't think that gay people deserve equal rights and families of gay people should not be given the same respect afforded to other families, then you ought to be in favor of domestic partnerships. To say you favor Civil Unions means you would want to create a third class of legal relationships. And really, do we need third-class status when we already have second-class status?

 

Amaya

May 18, 2009

This sentence by Jonetta displays a shocking level of ignorance: "I cling to cultural mores and teachings that are anchored in a religion that, truth told, I don’t practice with regularity but which nonetheless guides many of my decisions." What a joke Jonetta! I have more respect for fundamentalists who at least practice what they preach, but you seem comfortable forcing a litany of mores on others that you yourself don't even follow. The hypocrisy! And another thing Jonetta, marriage is primarily a legal contract that gives couples legal rights and tax benefits. If gays in DC can adopt children, then they should be afforded the same benefits as other families. The "holy matrimony" you so cherish is a religious ritual that is in addition to the legal contract (for those that choose it). If religious groups don't want to perform gay marriages, they don't have to.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Another snowball fight planned for Dupont Circle

The Official Dupont Circle Snowball Fight facebook fanpage has over 6,000 fans now, and it looks as if snowed in DC'ers will return for another battle. Full story

Politics

GOP winning war over Miranda rights for terrorists

Even as the administration defends its decision to grant accused Detroit bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, the president himself is hinting that things might be done differently in the future. Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story