Meghan Cox Gurdon

[Print]  [Email]        

Why does happiness elude modern women?

By: Meghan Cox Gurdon
Examiner Columnist
May 27, 2009

Over the last four decades, American women have got almost everything the feminist movement promised. Lucky us! Are we happy now?
 
No, we are not.   All across the industrialized world, wherever egalitarian feminism has sprinkled its fairy dust, women report that they are considerably less happy and satisfied with life then were their benighted, patriarchy-oppressed, apron-wearing sisters of yore.
 
“The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness,” a new study conducted by Wharton academics Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers, finds that the happiness of Western women has been steadily declining over the exact period during which egalitarian feminism has supposedly been delivering the goods.
 
Given the shifts “of rights and bargaining power from men to women in the past 35 years, holding all else equal, we might expect to see a concurrent shift in happiness towards women and away from men,” the authors write.
 
However, they have found, “measures of women’s subjective well-being have fallen both absolutely and relatively to that of men.”
 
How can this be? After all, didn’t feminism achieve what it wanted? Women are today not just free to pursue education, but now actually outnumber men on university campuses.
 
Women are not simply going out to work, but are in a position to exude wisdom and empathy from the highest levels of government and commerce.
 
Women are not only able to control their fertility, as radical feminists demanded, but today girls too young to vote are considered old enough to prescribe themselves the morning-after pill.   
 
And it turns out that all this success – or “success,” depending on your degree of irony – has not made women happier.   
 
Nor, of course, has it satisfied the ever-complaining feminist-industrial complex so brilliantly mocked by critic Camille Paglia as “a jumble of vulgarians, bunglers, whiners, French faddicts, apparatchiks, dough-faced party-liners, pie-in-the-sky utopians and bullying sanctimonious sermonizers.”
 
The study’s authors are cautious about drawing too-hasty conclusions from what they’ve discovered. Coincidence does not automatically mean causation. It’s also true that happiness is in some ways a mystical quality. Inner contentment derives not just from how cheerful we may feel but also from our position relative to the opinions and successes of others.
 
Yet the findings are striking. Before egalitarian feminism came along and substantially rewrote everyone’s scripts – in courtship, job expectations, domestic satisfaction, purpose in life -- women reported greater contentment than men.  
 
Today, those positions are reversing. “A new gender gap is emerging,” conclude Stevenson and Wolfers, “one with higher subjective well-being for men.”
 
(The authors note the perverse effects of the sexual revolution sought by feminists: Men “may have been able to disproportionately benefit” from the “increased opportunities” yielded by the spreading social acceptance of children born out of wedlock, the use of birth control, abortion, and divorce.)
 
To conservative critics of feminism, and indeed to dissident feminists like Paglia, none of this will be remotely surprising.
 
The anecdotal experience of millions, along with the analysis by women such as Christina Hoff Sommers, Mary Eberstadt, Danielle Crittenden, Barbara Dafoe Whitehead, and Kay Hymowitz, all confirm what the Wharton academics discovered: Far from enhancing the lives of modern women, in many respects the feminist movement has diminished women’s happiness and satisfaction.
 
“The increased opportunity to succeed in many dimensions may have led to an increased likelihood of believing that one’s life is not measuring up,” Stevenson and Wolfers write.
 
“Similarly, women may now compare their lives to a broader group, including men, and find their lives more likely to come up short in this assessment. Or women may simply find the complexity and increased pressure in their modern lives to have come at the cost of happiness.”
 
Examiner columnist Meghan Cox Gurdon is a former foreign correspondent and a regular contributor to the books pages of The Wall Street Journal. Her Examiner column appears on Thursdays.
 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines



 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

JOHN WICKEY

May 28, 2009

Might it be that women measure their life accomplishment from an inborn drive other than a need to compete with men?

 

JOHN WICKEY

May 28, 2009

Might it be that women measure their life accomplishment from an inborn drive other than a need to compete with men?

 

DRB

May 28, 2009

The world is so full of a number of things, That we should all be as happy as kings. And you know how happy kings are. -James Thurber Ah happiness. Ms Gurdon posits that the changes advocated by the feminist were to make women more happy and then proceeds to mercilessly pummel the feminists because woman are not happier. But these changes were not made to make woman happier. They were made because a system that stopped woman from going to school or receiving equal pay for equal work was wrong.

 

DRB

May 28, 2009

The world is so full of a number of things, That we should all be as happy as kings. And you know how happy kings are. -James Thurber Ah happiness. Ms Gurdon posits that the changes advocated by the feminist were to make women more happy and then proceeds to mercilessly pummel the feminists because woman are not happier. But these changes were not made to make woman happier. They were made because a system that stopped woman from going to school or receiving equal pay for equal work was wrong.

 

Women's Department of Happiness

May 29, 2009

I won't be at all surprised if the Federal Government establishes a Women's Happiness Agency and pours billioons upon billions of taxpayers money into it. For 40+ years it's been all about what women want. Governments all across the Western world love feminism because it grows the size of government bigger and bigger. I'll bet the government will fund a study to find out why women are unhappy and I won't be surprised if all they come up with for a reason is "because of a guy named Joe".

 

Happy Homemaker

May 29, 2009

Feminists are unhappy - because they also are busy hating women that are happy. Having a great dinner ready for my husband when he comes home from work is a real source I joy. I love to cook and I love everything domestic. There is no more important place in the world to me than our home. The feminists would love to see women like me eliminated, I'm sure!

 

Jitpring

May 30, 2009

Once again the Catholics are right. See, for example, Alice von Hildebrand's book, The Privilege of Being a Woman.

 

Tom

May 31, 2009

DRB: You should stop drinking the feminist cool-aid. Women were perfectly allowed to go to college and have jobs long before feminism. How do I know? My Mom did, and she is always surprised and upset when people associate feminism with that. It's just another feminist lie (there are so many, it's hard to keep track of them all).

 

BP

May 31, 2009

It's not so much the fact that women are unhappier now than they were before. It's just that since feminism reared its head normal men and women have stopped caring.

 

The Dewy Red

May 31, 2009

I am a modern woman, with all the privileges thereto accruing, and am incredibly happy--without children, I should add. Each woman needs to decide what she wants and go for it, as does each man. If one is then going to pay attention to what the world, at any given time, _claims_ should make one feel happy or valued--well, I can pretty much guarantee that one will end up unhappy. I thank God I was born when I was. I am grateful for everything. Most of my friends are as well.

 

Squirt

Jun 1, 2009

Well what a surprise. Prior to the arrival of fembots, men had to shoulder the hard work, job stress and providing for a family and when women finally got it themselves, many realised "gee, this sucks". Keep listening to the haridans girls, the life expectancy gap is shortening now you "have it all".

 

Betty Swolloks

Jun 1, 2009

It was only a matter of time before the women finally realised they have been sold a huge Lemon by the feminist liars. Unfortunately girls it's way too late, you made your bed, now lie in it. We men are just chuffed to little bits that you now "have it all". You can keep it, I will just relax and sit on the sidelines and grin. I hope they make that affirmative action for women more widespread, modern women are just not taking up the jobs quick enough for my liking. Meanwhile, what should I do? Go fishing? Go the pub? Go out on my bike? Maybe a trip to Asia for some R&R? Or should I get myself the standard 50+ hours job to support an unhappy and loveless wife and marriage? OoooH ! Let me think?

 

Sarah

Jun 3, 2009

Happy Homemaker, your version of "happiness" would be Hell to me. Please don't tell me what is suppose to make me "happy." If you enjoy being a domestic slave, then so be it.

 

Annon

Jun 5, 2009

Your premise is laughably bias. The heart of woman's lib, equal pay for equal work, has not been accomplished; women make approximately 76% less than men for the same number of hours worked. Furthermore, the equal rights amendment, another central aspect of the feminist movement, was not passed. So you are downright wrong when you say feminism has accomplished what it set out to do in creating an equal society. So, I'm expected to work as hard, or harder, than a man, for less money? That does make me unhappy, and rightly so.

 

Educated housewife

Jun 5, 2009

I have been on both sides of the grass,and I am so happy with my decision to stay home. I commend "Happy Homemaker". I believe that if women would put their families first, and not their careers, families would be much happier.

 

Mark

Jun 7, 2009

Annon, what a load of rubbish. First up, women do not make 76% less than men; then earn 76% OF WHAT MEN EARN, which is not the same thing. Secondly, 'wage gap' studies by feminists are biased, as they fail to account for total hours worked, years of experience, type of job (and men do the most dangerous jobs, incidentally) etc. Indeed, when one accounts for such factors, the 'gender wage gap' pretty much disappears. When considering men and women in their 20s, in the US, women actually OUTEARN men; which goes to show that it is not about discrimination, but women taking long career breaks to raise children; take a man who takes similar a career break, and his earnings will suffer accordingly, too. But, of course, feminist 'studies' don't account for such factors, as their agenda is simply to show women as oppressed, rather than to take an unbiased, objective look at things.

 

Happy Homemaker

Jun 9, 2009

To Sarah: Whatever lifestyle choices or deviances you choose for yourself - I'm happy for you. I probably would never choose anything you have chosen for your life. I am probably more of a true "feminist" that you are - I think it's great you can choose a different path from me. I feel sorry for you that you would view anything domestic as "hell". I wonder if you grew up in an unhappy or disfunctional home to view my being a homemaker as akin to being a "slave". I don't know if you have a college degree or not - but if you have every studied history at all - true slavery is heinous and to equate it with being a housewife is truly insulting and ignorant. I wish you happiness and hope you are as happy with your life as I am with mine - although I suspect that you may not be.

 

Abby

Jun 9, 2009

No, Happy Homemaker, I don't hate you or want you eliminated. But could you tone down the smug? I'm glad you are happy, I'd go nuts if I had to live like you do. I love my career, and would be at a loss if I was home all day. That's what it's all really about, being able to choose. You picked what makes you happy, and so did I. I don't know why so many other women aren't happy.

 

LV henderson

Jun 9, 2009

When did women ever have a reason to be happy? Women remain underpaid, overworked and unappreciated at home and work. Yet, it is light years from the stifling 50's, the lack of birth control and easy divorce, or the dark ages of the previous century. Equality, is a verb, not a noun. What part does society not understand? 62 cents per dollar for the same work.

 

shifuimam

Jun 12, 2009

"women report that they are considerably less happy and satisfied with life then were their benighted, patriarchy-oppressed, apron-wearing sisters of yore." This grammatical error makes me want to stab myself in the eye with a ballpoint pen. "Then" is not synonymous with "than"...

 

gwallan

Jun 12, 2009

No, LV henderson, "equality" is NOT a verb. I see the wage gap "debate" arises again. Easy solution for those women wanting to earn like men - work like men. Do the hours, the travel. Accept the dangers to life and limb. Women were never paid "62 cents per dollar for the same work". That particular statistical outcome related to average earnings for all full time employees regardless of the total hours worked or even the type of work.

 

Alexandra

Jun 13, 2009

I'd rather be a domestic "slave" then slave away in some cubicle. At least, being a HOUSEWIFE, I'm free to go wherever I like. As a domestic slave, I get to cart my child to the store, to the library, to the zoo...yep, I'm so burdened! LOL

 

INH

Jun 17, 2009

I’ve been happily married for three years, but after giving birth to our first child, my wife decided to quit her job and stay home as a “homemaker”. Once she quit her job, she’s been increasingly angry and complacent with our marriage and family. She continually tells me that; “it’s not my job to take care of you” and “I’m tired of cleaning, cooking and raising our child”. Now that I’m supporting the whole family, which I don’t mind doing; the financial pressure and my wife’s lack of contribution to the family has been deteriorating our relationship. I’m a modern man, but supporting the whole family and doing the majority of housework is starting to wear me out. How do I help my “Modern American Wife” realize that I love her and it takes two to raise a family and maintain a household?

 

Andy

Jul 3, 2009

Its not rocket science to figure this out,men need very little to be happy with their lives,its the lack of negative things that make men happy,by "liberating" women from the horrors of being wife and homemaker feminism also freed men from the demands to be a bread winner,they can kick back and do just enough to support themselves and their leisure pursuits,women however have discovered that working full time isnt exciting or fulfilling,like most working men, most working women dont have "careers" they have dull,tedious going nowhere jobs and thanks to the extra tax revenue this generates for the govt there is no way that this genie is going back into the bottle,couple this to the 40 years of non stop demonisation of men by the feminist cabals and governments that has seen many men become indifferent or even hostile to women its no surprise that so many women are unhappy.

 

Wife of one, Grandma to 6

Jul 4, 2009

INH, you have hit the nail on the head. Help her to realize that she is important and appreciated (and pick up after yourself). Thirty years ago my husband's dirty socks on the floor annoyed me (he picks them up now), and after having a decently fullfilling career, did feel like somebody's slave. Homemaking and childrearng take more skill and strength than most of us are aware of (Sarah's hell, if you will). When we discover the tedious, emotionally draining nature of the job, and discover that we are clueless, we either make our husband's life miserable, go back to work, or learn the delightful rewards of self-sacrifice (HappyHomemaker and Abby). None of this can be legislated, and the sooner we figure this out, the better.

 

INH

Jul 5, 2009

Wife of one, Grandma to 6; Thank you for your sincere and direct advice. I will tell, and and show her, how important she is in my life. I think we need to get back to the basics and re-connect with our relationship, friends and family. I am more than happy to do this (and clean up after myself) and hopefully, she will find the path that makes her happy.

 

Wife of one Grandma to 6

Jul 5, 2009

Thank you INH, we'll be praying for both of you.

 

scarlett

Jul 9, 2009

Observing the empty homes (empty of home-keeping wives and mothers) during the week's daylight hours is enough to make ANYONE less content and happy. Scarlett

 

GlobalMan

Jul 13, 2009

INH: LOL!! Welcome to hell dude. The modern woman? As soon as she pumps out a baby or two you are toast. I should know, happened to me. 14 years later we finally divorced and she was as nasty and vicious as could be despite being my beloved wife of 18 years. 14 years trying to get her to understand I needed some help to support and raise a family of 6. That other women do not rebuke such terrible wives as mine tells you everything you need to know. The man is the slave of a marriage. And I would never, every marry another woman or co-habit as long as I live. Sorry buddy...but your prognosis is not good...it's not an individual thing, it's pretty much all western women now.

 

Patriarch Verlch

Jul 13, 2009

The reason why 75% of women that work, work in poverty wage jobs, is because we were never meant to have both sexes working. Feminists have helped to double the workforce. They have displaced millions of men, who still need to support wives, ex wives, children, and ex children they never see because women have custody 90% of the time.

Now women have no choice, they "have" to work. All it is, is most likely supplemental income. Add in the extra cost of day care, car insurance, gas, extra food, it is most likely a wash anyways if you step back and look at the broader picture each year.

Women are still interested in the most powerful men, with the most means to support them. The sad fact is, they have found it, yes, in uncle Sam.

 

Patriarch Verlch

Jul 13, 2009

Soon America, like most 3rd world socialist nations, will not be able to enforce it's own laws!

Child support will be a thing of the past. And women will be easy to impress.

 

EvylShnukums

Sep 9, 2009

Hmm. Well first off as they point out there is the matter of relative deprivation. We measure our success against different criteria.

Secondly, how is "happiness" measured in this study? Quality of life compared against that of women in the 50s? The world has changed, and not all of it has made us happier.

Thirdly,and most importantly, I do not believe that the aims of feminism have really been attained yet. Men still outnumber women is most senior positions, women are still paid less, are still more often the victims of discrimination and sexual harassment at the workplace, domestic violence at home, and sexual and other violence in general life. Women, whether they are breadwinners or not are almost always the primary caregivers of children and/or relatives. Career women are often still seen as unfeminine or overly ambitious. The list goes on.

In other words, the pressure have increased vastly but the benefits not so much.

 

Charles Martel

Nov 7, 2009

INH: You got the worst possible advice from "Wife of one...". What you are experiencing is Beta contempt. Google "Roissy in DC" and start reading.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Georgia running back Washaun Ealey (24) is lifted up by tight end Aron White (81) as they celebrate Ealet's touchdown against Tennessee Tech during the second quarter of an NCAA college football game ...

Washaun Ealey rushes for 2 touchdowns as Georgia overwhelms Tennessee Tech 38-0

Washaun Ealey ran for two touchdowns as Georgia focused on its running game to beat Tennessee Tech 38-0 on Saturday for its first shutout in three years. Full story

Politics

Demonstrators chant on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009, during a Republican health Care reform rally. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

House Democrats clear impasse over abortion holding up vote on health care legislation

Capping months of months of struggle, House Democrats cleared an abortion-related impasse blocking a vote on sweeping health care legislation late Friday and officials expressed optimism they had finally lined up the support needed to pass President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. Full story

Entertainment

'Golden Girls' star McClanahan has bypass surgery

Rue McClanahan, who played sexy Southern belle Blanche Devereaux on "The Golden Girls," was recovering Thursday from heart bypass surgery at a New York City hospital. Full story