Melanie Scarborough

[Print]  [Email]        

Last Minute Doubts About Obama

By: Melanie Scarborough
Examiner Columnist
November 3, 2008

Lines are going to be long at the polls tomorrow, so maybe there will be time to ask Barack Obama's supporters to clarify a couple of things.

For one, I'm confused by their notion of "economic justice."  Last week, in defending his plan to "spread the wealth around,"  Obama said that "when everybody's got a little more money at the end of the month -- then guess what? Everybody starts spending that money. They decide, 'Maybe I can afford a new car; maybe I can afford a computer for my child.' They can buy the products and services that businesses are selling, and everybody is better off."

Everybody, that is, except the person who earned or saved the money that was redistributed.

Consider the retired gentleman who told me he took a brown-bag lunch to work every day to save the money it cost to eat out. If he saved an average of $5 every day, he accumulated more than $50,000 by the end of his 43-year career. By whose lights is it fair to redistribute those savings among individuals who chose to spend their money in restaurants?

I'd also like one of Obama's supporters to explain why they're eager to elect as president a man who says the Constitution is fundamentally flawed.  Given that when a president takes the oath of office, he vows to do only one thing -- "protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution of the United States" -- doesn't Obama's willingness to take that oath make him either unprincipled or dishonest?

Perhaps I'll bump into one of the people who claim to be voting for Obama as a repudiation of George W. Bush and ask if they don't detect the same arrogance in Obama.

We've already seen him toss off his campaign plane reporters from newspapers that endorsed John McCain. His campaign instructed supporters to jam the phone lines of radio stations that give air time to Obama's critics.

On Halloween, Omaba got angry at being photographed while taking his daughter trick-or-treating and ordered the press to "leave us alone" and "get back on the bus."  Monarchs can banish the media from their presence; presidents are supposed to tolerate coverage.

Most of all, I would like to know if Obama's supporters truly aren't the least bit concerned about electing as president a man with so little understanding of -- and perhaps even contempt for -- Americans' traditional way of life.

I know, I know; we're not supposed to talk about such things, but the facts speak for themselves. Only one of Obama's parents was an American, and she lived well outside the cultural mainstream.

Obama spent his grade-school years in his stepfather's native Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim-majority country.  While his contemporaries in the United States sat in classrooms adorned by pictures of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln and performed school plays about the founding fathers -- perhaps even took a field trip to Washington, D.C. -- Obama recalls "puzzling out the meaning of the muezzin's call to evening prayer."

A child growing up in Indonesia would be unfamiliar with experiences common to youngsters raised in the United States: Trick-or-treating, Thanksgiving pageants, the Pledge of Allegiance, Fourth of July traditions. It is remarkable that out of 300 million Americans, about the only one not steeped in Americana is likely to be our next president.

Obama spent his teenage years being raised in Hawaii by grandparents -- hardly a typical arrangement. He moved to the mainland only after he was grown, settling in Chicago.

What could Obama possibly know of the nation's heartland -- of the small towns sustained by small businesses where most Americans live?  No wonder people in rural and suburban areas are such an unknown quantity to him that he described them as "bitter" individuals who "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them...as a way to explain their frustrations."  He doesn't understand them at all.

So…Obama is critical of both capitalism and the Constitution; he's not too keen on the First Amendment; his experience with small-town America is almost non-existent -- and what he knows of it, he doesn't like. Yet tomorrow the nation almost certainly will elect him to be our 44th president.  Go figure.

Examiner columnist Melanie Scarborough is an award-winning commentary writer whose work has appeared in more than two dozen newspapers, magazines, and books.




To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Full-Time Doubts about Melanie Scarborough

Nov 3, 2008

This pathetic whining about non-issues is one of the reasons why the GOP is getting trounced. You have a long list of lies and exaggerations about Obama that no one believes them except your shrinking "base" of Bush-Cheney fans who think this country is going in the right direction.

 

gws

Nov 3, 2008

Melanie - you have stooped to an all time low. I thought you were above the Rovian smear tactics - but desperate times call for desperate measures. I have no last minutes doubts about Obama, but I do have last minutes doubts about you.

 

You said it, sister!

Nov 3, 2008

Thank you for bringing up these obscure truths. I don't get the adulation either, but, either way, on Weds. we have to unify for the country's sake. I appreciate you column.

 

Mantle

Nov 3, 2008

It seems to me Ms. Scarborough, as an "award winning" commentator, didn't bother to read Sen. Obama's position on tax in detail and all she has done is regurgitate republican talking points. Your readers deserve better. Time and again, Mr. Obama's position has always been to roll back George Bush's tax cut that was given to the wealthy not to the guys making $50K. (BTW -- your math appears to be flawed, $5 per day saving translates to $50K??) Also, it was not Obama who first said, the Constitution is less than perfect or has some flaws -- I believe the founders themselves testified to that fact from day one, but that was the best they can do to keep the union intact. Again, I strongly urge you to look at the fact, otherwise you risk being an extension to the republic attack machine and from what I stand, that's the worst place to be --

 

Frustrated Voter

Nov 3, 2008

Why is it that Obama is treated like Teflon--nothing bad ever sticks to him. Most of the media has given him a free ride on his troubled past. It is refreshing to see someone open the issues for public critiques. Thanks Melanie.

 

Frustrated Voter

Nov 3, 2008

Why is it that Obama is treated like Teflon--nothing bad ever sticks to him. Most of the media has given him a free ride on his troubled past. It is refreshing to see someone open the issues for public critiques. Thanks Melanie.

 

WILLIAM E MATTISON

Nov 3, 2008

This columnist succinctly sums up most of the questions I have about senator obama and makes the tome worthy of my reproduction and sharing with many - both sides! I only wish that those who have been taken-in by the astute commucator had been able to read Ms Scarborough's definitive article earlier. I think they would give serious thought to changing their vote!

 

jenna

Nov 3, 2008

I agree with Mantles comment. What Obama has proposed is only that the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans not be extended and that tax cuts instead be given to middle class workers. A retiree such as Ms Scarborough's example would likely not pay any income tax at all under Obama's plan -- so he not only keeps his savings but likely is better able to live off of them than under McCain's tax breaks for the richest Americans. At bottom, Ms Scarborough's diatribe shows that she is a pure ideologue. Facts and truth don’t matter to her, just winning at all costs, regardless of what she has to say to get there. She certainly has a right to her opinions but I wished the Examiner at least put the contrary point of view side by side to hers for fairness (and honesty).

 

jenna

Nov 3, 2008

One other thing. Ms. Scarborough has turned Obama's point on the Constitution on its head. Obama (a former constitutional law professor) said that the civil rights movement could NOT acheive economic redistribution through litigation because the Consititution does NOT require government to provide that benefit. His point was that only by politically coming together through legislation can goverment meet these needs. He said that litigation could not achieve them. So Ms Scarborough again either did not read, or does not understand, or wants to knowingly lie to the public about what is true here. Very sad that she has a column in the examiner that goes unrebuted in print.

 

Greg

Nov 3, 2008

Did you write this or Sean Hannity? I can't tell the difference. That comment on the Constitution only plays to the ignorant. And trying to portray Obama as someone other than an American is way beneath even you. But then, you and your paper only serve your neo-con base.

 

Shari Ramsey

Nov 3, 2008

Yes, the lines will be long at the polls on Tuesday, mainly because the American people are tired of viewpoints such as yours that have taken us down to the muddy abyss. Lets just say that George W. Bush counts you as a friend. Further, this nation will elect Senator Barack Obama on Tuesday to be our 44th president because the people of America believe "Enough is enough". Go figure.

 

Reeves

Nov 3, 2008

Melanie, Is this some kind of smear coordination? I turned on the TV and there was a new Reverend Wright hate ad. You guys are despicable. As an independent, it turns me off and more toward Obama. I for one am sick of these Rovian Tactics.

 

CS

Nov 3, 2008

As usual, the Obamabots crawl out of the woodwork to launch ad hominem attacks, as they cannot refute your assertions. Obama said that it was a "tragedy" that the Civil Rights movement could not achieve redistribution through the courts; he referred to the Constitution as an "impediment". This, along with his disdain for Middle America, and his disdain for the First Amendment, should give anyone pause. Those who are not drinking the kool aid, anyway.

 

WILLIAM

Nov 4, 2008

Has there been a sinbgle POSITIVE editorial from this paper for Obama?

 

ECS

Nov 13, 2008

I couldn't agree with you more. I think there will be a day of reckoning for him.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Suspended NASCAR Sprint Cup driver Jeremy Mayfield chats with attendees during a public auction Friday, Nov. 20, 2009, at his Catawba, N.C. property. As NASCAR prepares to crown a champion in its fina...

Long way from the track, suspended Mayfield holds large auction to help pay for court fight

Jeremy Mayfield sat in the back of his large barn Friday morning about 800 miles from where NASCAR's season-ending weekend was kicking off. Several hundred people surrounded him, listening intently as a fast-speaking auctioneer sold dozens of items. Full story

Economy

Venezuela seeks to annul pharmaceutical patents for antibiotic produced by Bayer HealthCare

Venezuela's trade minister says the government plans to annul the pharmaceutical patents for an antibiotic produced by Bayer HealthCare. Full story

Entertainment

Pedro Almodovar discusses his childhood, his influences and what he won't put on film

Sex. Drugs. Prostitution. Pedophilia. Rape. Pedro Almodovar has been able to translate some of the most delicate subjects to the big screen with grace and humor. Full story