Columns and OpEds

[Print]  [Email]        

Marta Mossburg: More death panels on the Obama health care agenda

By: Marta Mossburg
Examiner Columnist
December 1, 2009

Get ready for restricted health care in Maryland.

Not everyone has to worry, yet. But if the U.S. Senate health care bill passes, mammograms will not be the only diagnostic test or treatment harder to come by in Maryland and throughout the United States, as experts in controlling costs gain power and money at the expense of doctors and patients.

State regulators already follow guidelines set by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The task force recently recommended women should start to receive mammograms every two years at 50 instead of yearly checks beginning at 40, causing an uproar among doctors and patients locally and around the nation.

Because of the outcry, Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., sponsored an amendment to the health care legislation that would guarantee women access to mammograms starting at 40. But it is not stopping Maryland regulators from reviewing state policies.

Dr. Rex Cowdry, executive director of the Maryland Health Care Commission, said changing the mammography guidelines will be one of a number of measures the commissioners will discuss to contain costs at an upcoming meeting.

Other ideas to be considered include closing the Maryland Health Insurance Plan to new enrollment and increasing premiums for participants, about 16,000 people unable to obtain private insurance because of pre-existing conditions. State hospitals and their patients spent about $90 million last year subsidizing those enrolled in the program.

Those 16,000 are not the only ones potentially affected by task force recommendations, however. The Maryland Health Care Commission oversees regulations for the small group-health market, which covers 407,983 people in the state. Any regulatory changes for both MHIP and the small group market would become effective July 1.

Employers who self-insure, generally large companies with a multistate presence, also can change guidelines. The General Assembly would have to pass legislation to change coverage for those with individual insurance or covered by insurance from large employers in the state.

Dr. David Rothfeld of Shady Grove Radiology, which opposes the new mammography guidelines, said he thinks there would be a large public outcry if the legislature tried to change the rules on mammography. But the Senate legislation may make it very difficult to ignore recommendations on any type of care from future task forces.

It would create panels who publish patient "decision aids" to help patients choose the appropriate (read: Cost-effective) care and discriminate financially against groups who do not follow the shared decision-making process the government recommends.

While some legislators may be able to create exceptions for certain treatments like Mikulski did, the whole point of the health care reform is to save money, which requires restricting access to care.

"This is about saving money. We're not talking about quality of care," he said. He expects "a lot more panels" to decide when someone deserves treatment if health legislation passes.

The worst part about it is that there will be no recourse for bad decisions. "You can't sue them. They are not answerable to anyone," he said.

That fact means a two-tiered health care system will emerge in the United States as it has in Canada and other countries with universal coverage. One will ration care to contain costs, cover everyone and treat people like data points to meet government regulation. The second will treat people as individuals and charge them large fees for "concierge care" as some already do.

No one can deny the rich do not fare better under this scenario. But so long as the government is OK with poor women dying of breast cancer, old people being denied hip replacements and middle-aged moms being denied liver transplants that may not work, just in order to make a budget the government will no doubt exceed exponentially, the new system will work just fine.

Examiner Columnist Marta Mossburg is a senior fellow with the Maryland Public Policy Institute and lives in Baltimore.




beltway confidential

In a brief op-ed in USA Today, White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan charges that critics who question the Obama administration's decision to grant Miranda rights to...

Wall Street Journal -- Leverage Sought In Health Summit Republicans are asking President Obama to make a show of good faith before his proposed health care summit by publicly...

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., sends word by e-mail of a Marco Rubio moneybomb tomorrow, to celebrate the anniversary of President Obama's hug with Rubio's opponent for the GOP Senate...

In a television interview this afternoon, Democratic Tennessee Rep. Steve Cohen pronounced judgment on the doctors who were operating on Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa., when he died....






To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Bernie In Omaha

Nov 30, 2009

Anyone who doesn't see the rationing of health services in these bills - well what can I say. It is not only rationing it is also prohibition of non-approved procedures even if a patient wants to pay for them personally - the "single payer" is also an evil threat - that payer - the government is the only one who decided what is allowed - bad stuff folks. Some people I know think this is "free health care" for them - what nonsense it is forced purchase of government insurance and then no control of what treatments you get.

 

Publius

Dec 1, 2009

Rationing is inevitable for all except the wealthy - health care is now 16% of GDP and its cost increases 8% a year. It will be 26% of GDP in just ten years absent rationing. Our government has come up with no ways to limit its cost or the growth of that cost. The current bill only serves to add millionsof new patients to the number receiving treatment. There are good systems such as in Germany that we could copy but "not invcented here" constrains us as does our non-parliamentary governmental systenm which makes compromise impossible on any issue. We are headed for national bankruptcy. It is inevitable.

 

Patchy

Dec 1, 2009

Isn't it interesting that Dems become ultra-vigilant soldiers of 'cost containment' on a single issue?

Where is their fiscal rectitude on other matters....or is this cost containment story simply a Trojan Horse for de facto socialized medicine?

 

Kazooskibum

Dec 1, 2009

Remember: The issue is never the issue. The issue is control.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




Local

Slideshow: Washington area snow photos

Here are some of the best snow photos in the DC area from the Associated Press, the Examiner' s own Andrew Harnik and courtesy photos from Kathleen Dellinger: Full story

Politics

Rep. John Murtha dies at 77

A spokesman says Democratic Rep. John Murtha of... Full story

Local

D.C. region braces for up to 20 more inches of snow

The National Weather Service has the entire D.C. metro area, from Prince William County north, under a winter storm warning for 10 to 20 inches of snow. Forecasters have had their eyes on this storm for days, but the projected snow totals were bumped up late Monday. Full story